Vacuum-UV photofragmentation of polyatomic ions using coincidence techniques

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0368-2048(98)00418-6Get rights and content

Abstract

We describe an apparatus for performing three types of coincidence experiment to study state-selected photofragmentation of polyatomic ions in the gas phase; threshold photoelectron–photoion coincidences (TPEPICO), photoion–fluorescence coincidences (PIFCO), and threshold photoelectron–fluorescence coincidences (TPEFCO). Photoionisation in the vacuum-UV, 10–25 eV, is obtained using tunable radiation from the Daresbury, UK Synchrotron Radiation Source. Examples are taken from published work in CF4+, PCl3+ and PBr3+, and a range of perfluorocarbon cations CxFy+.

Introduction

Our group has been studying the electronic spectroscopy and unimolecular decay dynamics of cations in the gas phase containing 4–14 atoms, especially the halides of groups III–VI of the periodic table (e.g. CF4+). Although small enough to be amenable to ab initio calculations, many of these ions are sufficiently large that statistical factors should determine their fragmentation pathways. One aim of this project is to understand the factors that determine non-statistical effects in excited valence states of such medium-sized polyatomic ions, whose size is intermediate between that of diatomic ions (where dynamical processes should dominate) and much larger cations (where statistical effects should dominate). In general, an excited state of such an ion, (ABn+)*, created by photoionisation can decay radiatively by fluorescence or non-radiatively by fragmentation:ABn+tunable VUV radiation→(ABn+)*+e,(ABn+)*—krad→(ABn+)+or(ABn+)*—knon-rad→fragment ions+neutralswhere k is a first-order decay rate constant. Processes (2) and (3) are studied in two separate experiments at the Daresbury Synchrotron Radiation Source, UK by fluorescence excitation and coincidence spectroscopy, respectively. Non-statistical effects in polyatomic ions are manifest either by the observation of radiative decay (process 2), or by unexpectedly large releases of kinetic energy (KE) into translational motion of the fragment ion+neutral products (process 3). To date, coincidence experiments have been performed to study fluorescence and fragmentation processes in a range of polyatomic ions (e.g. CF4+ and SiF4+, CCl4+, SiCl4+ and GeCl4+, CF3Cl+ and CF3Br+, BCl3+ and SF6+) [1]. We have established [1] that the most important criterion in determining whether an ion fragments in a statistical or non-statistical manner is the presence or absence of a bound, ground electronic state of the parent ion.

Our group has also performed pure spectroscopic experiments in the VUV both at Daresbury and BESSY 1 in Berlin, studying fluorescence processes both in molecular ions (process 2) and in neutral free radicals produced by photodissociation of Rydberg states of the neutral, parent molecule, i.e.ABn+tunable VUV radiation→ABn*→ABn−1*+B→ABn−1+B+Non-dispersed fluorescence excitation experiments are performed at Daresbury where, by using fluorescence in a fragment free radical as a probe of VUV absorption in the parent molecule, experiments yield VUV spectra of the parent molecule. Dispersion of the induced fluorescence is possible in experiments performed at BESSY, yielding low-resolution electronic spectra of the fragment radicals (e.g. BCl2· from BCl3, SiF3· and SiF2 from SiF4, PF2· and PF from PF3) [2], [3], [4].

Five posters are presented at VUV12 illustrating these techniques for a range of molecules. For this special issue of J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., we present this work as two back-to-back papers. In this first paper on coincidence spectroscopy, data on CF4+ are presented [5] which illustrate the different forms of coincidence experiments which can monitor radiative and non-radiative decay in excited states of cations. Then, more recent TPEPICO data on PCl3+ and PBr3+ [6] and a range of saturated and unsaturated perfluorocarbons CxFy+ [7] are presented.

Section snippets

Experimental

Studies of single-ionisation processes are performed using coincidence techniques in which threshold photoelectrons, ions and fluorescence photons are collected, and any pair correlated in time. Three forms of coincidence spectroscopy are currently used at Daresbury (Fig. 1):

  • 1.

    Threshold PhotoElectron–PhotoIon COincidences (TPEPICO). The fragment ions are separated by time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOF-MS). A threshold electron analyser defines the energy of the photoelectron to be between zero

CF4+

We have studied in detail fragmentation of the C̃2T2 third excited valence state of CF4+ using all three kinds of coincidence spectroscopy [5], [9]. This state exhibits vibrational structure in its photoelectron spectrum, is metastable with a lifetime of several ns, and exhibits both radiative and non-radiative decay pathways. Low vibrational levels of the ν1 (a1) manifold of CF4+2T2 decay with unity fluorescence quantum yield to the lower-lying Ã2T2 and X̃2T1 states. These states are

PCl3+ and PBr3+

We have studied the fragmentation of all the valence states of these two cations by TPEPICO spectroscopy [6]. Although fluorescence experiments have suggested that the Ẽ2E state of these parent cations does decay radiatively [10], to date PIFCO and TPEFCO fluorescence coincidence experiments have been unsuccessful. The ground and first excited states of both PCl3+ and PBr3+ are stable with respect to dissociation to PX2+ (X=Cl, Br), whereas the B̃2E, C̃2E, D̃2A1 and Ẽ2E states dissociate

The saturated and unsaturated perfluorocarbon cations, CxFy+

We have recently studied a range of saturated and unsaturated PFC molecules (e.g. C2F6, C3F8, n-C4F10, C2F4, C3F6, 2-C4F8) by TPEPICO spectroscopy [7], for two overriding reasons. Firstly, from a pure science viewpoint, it has been known for some time that C2F6+ exhibits non-statistical effects [18], including direct dissociation from excited states of the cation with large KE releases into fragment ions. Such effects should become less common as the size of the cation and hence the density of

Acknowledgements

We thank NERC, EPSRC and the Daresbury Laboratory for a Research Grant, Research Studentships (GKJ, KJB) and a CASE award (KJB). We also thank Dr. I. Powis (Nottingham University) for the use of his kinetic energy analysis programme, and Dr. P.A. Hatherly (Reading University) for technical advice on the apparatus.

References (21)

  • H. Biehl et al.

    Chem. Phys.

    (1997)
  • R. Rüede et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (1993)
  • M.G. Inghram et al.

    Int. J. Mass Spec. Ion Phys.

    (1980)
  • G.K. Jarvis et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (1998)
  • P.A. Hatherly et al.

    Zeit. Phys. Chem.

    (1996)
  • H. Biehl et al.

    J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.

    (1995)
  • H. Biehl et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1997)
  • H. Biehl et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1998)
  • D.M. Smith et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1994)
  • K.J. Boyle et al.

    J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.

    (1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

1

Present address: Department of Chemistry, MS 6-2100, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

View full text