The comparative strengths of internal fixation techniques

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(84)80145-8Get rights and content

The strengths of internal fixation techniques have been compared by transecting human cadaver metacarpals, reducing and fixing the fractures, and then applying forces to mechanically bend the bone during simulated flexion. Kirschner wires alone, intraosseous wire loops with and without Kirschner wires, and bone plates were tested. Intraosseous loops were tested in three configurations, each with four different wire gauges. Intraosseous loops were stronger than Kirschner wires. Right-angle loops were the best of the intraosseous configurations. The addition of a Kirschner wire strengthened the best dorsopalmar intraosseous loops but not the best right-angle loops. Dorsal bone plates were comparable with the best intraosseous loop configurations of 26-gauge wire.

Cited by (75)

  • The biomechanics of fixation techniques for hand fractures

    2013, Hand Clinics
    Citation Excerpt :

    The plate fixation was significantly more rigid under axial loads than the next strongest method of fixation (2 lag screws), but fixation was not statistically significantly different in bending or torsion.16 One series suggests that appropriate interosseous configurations for the fixation of simulated transverse metacarpal fractures (90° loop positioning of two 26-gauge loops) are comparable in strength with nonlocked plating.21 Although it can be technically demanding and requires additional soft tissue exposure, the fixation is generally low profile and applies adequate compression at the fracture site.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text