Quantitative competitive (QC) PCR for quantification of porcine DNA
Introduction
Several analytical approaches have been made to identify animal species in fresh or processed meat products in order to protect consumers from fraud and adulteration. Today several methods exist for determination of animal species (Bauer & RippelRachle, 1998, Meyer & Candrian, 1996a). Besides protein based techniques like isoelectric focusing (IEF) or Elisa which suffer from inaccuracy and denaturation of soluble proteins during processing (Berger et al., 1988, Jemmi & Schlosser, 1991, Sinclair & Slattery, 1982), DNA techniques have become very important and are widely used nowadays. Advantages of DNA analysing methods are manifold: DNA is a relatively stable molecule easily allowing analysis of processed and heat treated food products (Beneke & Hagen, 1998, Unseld et al., 1995). Due to the ubiquity of DNA in every type of cells, all kinds of tissue can be analysed. Early methods based on hybridisation of specific probes (Chikuni et al., 1990, Wintero et al., 1990) were complicated, time consuming and insufficient for complex matrices.
The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Saiki et al., 1988) proved to be an adequate technique for detection of small amounts of DNA, specifically amplifying a target region of template DNA in a rapid and sensitive manner. Using either specific or universal primers, many sequences of mitochondrial (e.g. cytochrome b gene) (Burgener & Hubner, 1998, Matsunaga et al., 1999) or genomic DNA have been analyzed for various animals like fish (Cespedes et al., 1999, Quinteiro et al., 1998), game species (Wolf, Rentsch & Hubner, 1999), several domestic animals and from caviar (Birstein et al., 1998, Wolf et al., 1999) as well as from plants (Meyer et al., 1996, Schmidt-Puchta et al., 1989) and a variety of genetically modified organisms (GMO) (Hupfer et al., 1998, Meywe, 1995, Zimmerman et al., 1998). Universal primer systems like cytochrome b PCR allow identification of several species within one analysis but, however, PCR products have to be longer to contain sufficient DNA sequence variation for restriction analysis (RFLP) (Mayr et al., 1993, Wolf et al., 1999) or single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) (Rehbein et al., 1999). Especially in processed food products, DNA is often degraded to just a few hundred base pairs and is precluded from PCR amplification. Species specific PCR systems allow shorter amplicons, as amplification indicates the presence of the gene/sequence of interest. For many domestic animals like cattle (Zhang, Zheng, Zhou, Ouyang & Lu, 1999), pig (Meyer, Candrian & Lüthy, 1994), chicken (Hopwood, Fairbrother, Lockley & Bardsley, 1999), sheep and goat (Chikuni, Tabata, Kosugiyama, Monma & Saito, 1994), single PCR systems exist and recently a multiplex PCR system was reported (Matsunaga et al., 1999) using one universal and one specific primer for each species for simultaneous detection of several animals in one analysis.
PCR systems used today only allow a qualitative detection of animal species. Because even trace amounts of less than 0.1% of one species lead to positive PCR results (Behrens, Unthan, Brinkmann, Buchholz & Latus, 1999), it is necessary to differentiate between technically unavoidable contamination or intentional admixture. Therefore, adequate quantitative detection methods for small amounts of DNA must be available. PCR analysis can be used as a quantitative method if internal standards (competitors) are coamplified with the target DNA. Quantitative competitive PCR (QC-PCR) was first described in 1990 (Gilliland, Perrin, Blanchard & Bunn, 1990) and is widely used in many fields of analysis (Moller & Jansson, 1997, Siebert & Larrick, 1992, Studer et al., 1998). However, so far no QC-PCR system has been reported for detection of animal species in food products.
In our work we describe the development and evaluation of a new, porcine specific QC-PCR system based on the growth hormone gene of sus scrofa.
Section snippets
Meat samples
Authentic samples of frozen meat (muscle) of pig (sus scrofa) and cattle (bos taurus) were obtained by the Swiss Federal Veterinary Office (FVO). Eight commercial samples of minced meat, or sausages from a local supermarket were analysed to check species declaration: 1=minced beef, 2=frozen hamburger (cattle), 3=sausage (cattle), 4=suzuk sausage (cattle, sheep), 5=poultry sausage (chicken, turkey), 6=poultry wiener sausage (chicken, turkey, pig, bacon fat), 7=poultry grilled sausage (chicken,
Porcine specific PCR
A new primer system (GHP1-2) was developed based on the final non coding region following Exon 5 of the porcine growth hormone (GenBank accession number M17704) specifically generating a 225 bp amplicon. Priming sites were selected using the OLIGO Primer design software A sequence comparison with other meat animals was not possible within the non coding region, thus selectivity was examined by testing the primer pair with DNA extracted from cattle, sheep, chicken and turkey. None of the animals
Discussion
This work describes a possible solution of a common problem in food production: differentiation between technically unavoidable contamination and intentional admixture. Quantitative competitive PCR (QC-PCR) offers a possibility of monitoring a certain limit of porcine DNA even in processed and heat treated meat products. As shown in Fig. 7, other methods like universal PCR of a part of the cytochrome b gene followed by species specific RFLP failed due to different efficiency of amplification of
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. Jürg Rentsch for critical reading of the manuscript and Dr. P Hübner for encouragement during the first part of this work.
References (38)
- et al.
An actin gene-related polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for identification of chicken in meat mixtures
Meat Science
(1999) - et al.
A quick and simple method for the identification of meat species and meat products by PCR assay
Meat Science
(1999) - et al.
PCR-based DNA Analysis for the Identification and Characterization of Food Components
Lebensmittelwissenschaft und Technologie
(1996) - et al.
Fish species identification in canned tuna by PCR-SSCPvalidation by a collaborative study and investigation of intra-species variability of the DNA-patterns
Food Chemistry
(1999) - et al.
A comparison of DNA-hybridisation, immunodiffusion, countercurrent immunoelectrophoresis and isoelectric focusing for detecting the admixture of pork to beef
Meat Science
(1990) - et al.
Differentiation of sturgeon species by PCR-RFLP
Food Research International
(1999) - et al.
A sensitive detection method for genetically modified MaisGard (TM) corn using a nested PCR-system
Food Science and Technology- Lebensmittel- Wissenschaft & Technologie
(1998) - et al.
Cell biology
(1976) - et al.
Species identification in meat and meat products
Wiener Tierarztliche Monatsschrift
(1998) - et al.
Identification of animal species in heated and complex meat products using species specific PCR reactions
Fleischwirtschaft
(1999)
Applicability of PCR (polymerase chain reaction) for the detection of animal species in heated meat products
Fleischwirtschaft
Detection of poultry and pork in cooked and canned meat foods by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays
Journal Association of Official Analytical Chemists
Population aggregation analysis of three caviar-producing species of sturgeons and implications for the species identification of black caviar
Conservation Biology
Mitochondrial DNA enrichment for species identification and evolutionary analysis
Zeitschrift für Lebensmitteluntersuchung und-Forschung
Identification of sole (Solea solea) and Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) by PCR amplification of the 5S rDNA gene
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Species identification of cooked meats by DNA hybridization assay
Meat Science
Polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of sheep and goat meats
Meat Science
Analysis of cytokine mRNA and DNAdetection and quantitation by competitive polymerase chain reaction
Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA
A rapid procedure for the quantitation of low abundance RNAs by competitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
Nucleic Acids Research
Cited by (57)
Halal detection technologies: analytical method approaches, validation and verification, and multivariate data analysis for halal authentication
2023, Innovation of Food Products in Halal Supply Chain WorldwideHalal and Kosher gelatin: Applications as well as detection approaches with challenges and prospects
2021, Food BioscienceCitation Excerpt :These methods, however, have several drawbacks: they can only detect a limited sequence of proteins (i.e., epitope), the detection quality is solely dependent on the specificity of the antibody used, posing a significant risk of false negatives or positives, and no data mining or molecular information can be derived (Yang et al., 2018). However, these methods cannot be used for routine analysis of highly processed gelatin products as there is every likelihood that peptide biomarkers may be denatured under heat, pressure and chemical treatments (Wolf & Lüthy, 2001). The previously reported ELISA-based techniques for the detection of gelatin origin are presented in Table 4.
Comparison of real-time PCR methods for quantification of European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in processed food samples
2019, Food ChemistryCitation Excerpt :Rasmussen & Morrissey, 2008; Teletchea, 2009). However, there are fewer techniques available for the quantification of species and, with the exception of competitive and real-time PCR, these methods usually give semiquantitative results (Marcelino, Guimarães, & De-Barros, 2008; Wolf & Lüthy 2001). Real-time PCR relies on fluorescence dyes or probes to detect the progress of amplification.
Molecular techniques for speciation of meat
2019, Meat Quality Analysis: Advanced Evaluation Methods, Techniques, and TechnologiesQualitative and quantitative assessment of DNA quality of frozen beef based on DNA yield, gel electrophoresis and PCR amplification and their correlations to beef quality
2018, Food ChemistryCitation Excerpt :Understanding changes in quality during frozen storage is, therefore, of vital importance to maintain beef quality. There is progress in applying DNA-related techniques for identifying the species of different processed food products and food authenticity as well as traceability (Hsieh, Chai, Cheng, Hsieh, & Hwang, 2004; Wolf & Lüthy, 2001). To date, only a few studies have investigated meat quality by evaluating DNA quality.
Identification of meat origin in food products-A review
2016, Food ControlCitation Excerpt :The PCR is a rapid in vitro enzymatic techniques, which is used to amplify a single or several copies of a specific piece of DNA across several orders of magnitudes, generating many thousands-to a million-fold of a particular DNA sequence within a few hours (Joshi & Deshpande, 2011; Kumar et al., 2013). Several PCR based techniques, namely Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) (Ali, Hashim, Mustafa, & Man, 2012; Girish et al., 2004; Murugaiah et al., 2009), Single-strand Conformation Polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) (Rehbein, Kress, & Schmidt, 1997, 1999), PCR-sequencing (Ali, Rahman, et al., 2014; Karlsson & Holmlund, 2007), Multiplex (Ali et al., 2015; Asensio, González, Pavón, García, & Martín, 2008; Hou et al., 2015), Quantitative Competitive (QC-PCR) (Wolf & Lüthy, 2001), and Real time PCR (Fajardo et al., 2008b; Kesmen, Celebi, Güllüce, & Yetim, 2013) have been employed for the detection of meat authenticity. The required ingredient for any successful PCR amplification are DNA templates, a pair of forward and reverse oligonucleotide primers, all four deoxynucleotide triphosphates, a thermostable DNA polymerase enzyme, and a reaction buffer (Kumar et al., 2013).