Neuroendocrine and behavioral responses to mCPP in Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder
Introduction
The “serotonergic hypothesis” has been the most popular theory implicated in the pathophysiology of Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder (OCD) (Murphy et al., 1989, Zohar et al., 1992). The most compelling evidence for a serotonergic role in OCD comes from pharmacological treatment studies. Selective Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) which include clomipramine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, sertraline and zimeldine possess significant anti-obsessional properties which were not observed with less serotonin-specific agents like imipramine, amitriptyline, nortriptyline and desipramine (Goodman et al., 1989, Kahn et al., 1984, Thoren et al., 1980, Turner et al., 1985, Zak et al., 1988, Zohar et al., 1992). Further evidence for the role of serotonin comes from the study of markers and biological probes. These include platelet studies which link reductions in serotonin activity with clinical response (Flament et al., 1987) and CSF 5–HIAA levels which were shown to be inversely related to treatment response (Thoren et al., 1980). Since the mid-1980s, efforts to characterize central nervous system serotonergic function in OCD have turned to the assessment of behavioral, neuroendocrine and physiological responses of OCD subjects to pharmacological challenge with serotomimetic compounds such as l–tryptophan and fenfluramine (indirectly acting agonists) and ipsapirone, buspirone, MK–212 and mCPP (directly acting agonists).
mCPP is the first and most widely used direct 5–HT receptor agonist to be administered in a challenge paradigm to psychiatric patients to examine the state of the 5–HT receptor system (Kahn and Wetzler, 1991). It is a non-selective 5–HT2C/1D/2A/1A receptor agonist which antagonizes stimulation of 5–HT3 and alpha2 receptors (Baumgarten and Grozdanovic, 1998, Hamik and Peroutka, 1989). At doses of 0.75 and 0.50 mg/kg body weight orally (PO), mCPP induces distinct behavioral and neuroendocrine responses in OCD patients that have been shown to be significantly different from control subjects, even though some studies have shown negative, equivocal or inconclusive results. Table 1 gives a summary of various studies that have looked into the neuroendocrine and behavioral responses to mCPP challenge in patients with OCD and healthy control subjects.
Zohar et al. (1987) were the first to utilize orally administered mCPP under double-blind, placebo-controlled conditions in OCD patients. They found out that with 0.5 mg/kg PO, cortisol release was blunted in OCD patients as compared to normal subjects. Similar results were also obtained by Hollander et al. (1991). However other studies using the same dosage and route of administration have failed to show significant differences between patients and controls (Hollander et al., 1992, Pigott et al., 1991, Pigott et al., 1993). With IV mCPP at 0.1 mg/kg infused over 20 min, the cortisol response was found to be not different from normals (Charney et al., 1988).
Prolactin response to oral mCPP was found to be blunted in OCD patients compared with normal subjects (Hollander et al., 1992). However three other studies utilizing a similar methodology failed to show significant differences between OCD patients and controls (Hollander et al., 1991, Pigott et al., 1993, Zohar et al., 1987). With IV mCPP at 0.1 mg/kg infused over 20 min, the prolactin response was found to be blunted only in female patients (Charney et al., 1988).
Studies that have attempted to find the effect of chronic treatment with SSRIs have largely noted no reversal of blunted neuroendocrine responses following treatment, as opposed to reversal of behavioral exacerbation. The blunting of cortisol and prolactin responses following mCPP in patients with OCD was found to be unaffected by chronic treatment with clomipramine (Zohar et al., 1988) even though an increased basal level of prolactin was noticed in the treated patients as compared to pretreatment levels. Hollander et al. (1991) in a small sample of six OCD subjects found that the cortisol and prolactin responses were enhanced during chronic fluoxetine treatment. However, the plasma concentrations of mCPP were noted to be four-fold higher in the fluoxetine-treated patients.
Oral mCPP produced exacerbation of obsessive–compulsive symptoms and induced more anxiety in OCD patients compared to controls (Zohar et al., 1987, Hollander et al., 1988, Hollander et al., 1991). Another study using oral mCPP showed exacerbation of obsessive–compulsive symptoms, but failed to demonstrate induction of anxiety (Hollander et al., 1992). Two other studies using oral mCPP failed to demonstrate symptom exacerbation (Goodman et al., 1995, Pigott et al., 1993).
IV mCPP at 0.1 mg/kg infused over 20 min did not demonstrate symptom worsening (Charney et al., 1988, Goodman et al., 1995). However, IV mCPP at 0.1 mg/kg, when infused as a bolus over 90 seconds produced worsening of obsessive–compulsive symptoms (Pigott et al., 1993).
Clomipramine 300 mg/day for 3.5 months (Zohar et al., 1988) and fluoxetine 80 mg/day for 12 weeks (Hollander et al., 1991) abolished the effects of mCPP on exacerbation of obsessive–compulsive symptoms observed in patients prior to initiation of drug treatment.
Thus, it may be observed that blunting of neuroendocrine responses to direct serotonergic agonists is associated with behavioral supersensitivity in at least a subgroup of patients with OCD. Long term treatment with SSRIs attenuates the behavioral supersensitivity to mCPP but does not have unequivocal effects in reversing the blunted neuroendocrine responses. Since the behavioral supersensitivity that has been noted by some of the studies reversed with symptomatic improvement following treatment with serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the mCPP-induced behavioral effects must be “state-related” (i.e., observed in patients with active symptomatology of OCD), and due to mCPP's effects on the 5–HT system (Kahn and Wetzler, 1991). Blunting of neuroendocrine responses to direct serotonergic agents could be a “trait marker” that indicates vulnerability for OCD and therefore does not reverse with successful treatment of symptoms of OCD.
It may be inferred from the results of the above-mentioned studies that serotonergic mechanisms are definitely involved in the pathophysiology of OCD. However many of the studies provide conflicting results and therefore no clear-cut consensus is available regarding the nature of behavioral and neuroendocrine responses to serotonergic challenge in OCD. The present study was designed to replicate and supplement the existing findings regarding the neuroendocrine and behavioral effects of PO mCPP in OCD.
Section snippets
Methods
The present study employed a double-blind randomized design wherein all the subjects in both patient group and control group received mCPP or placebo in a double-blind randomized fashion. Subjects in both the groups were studied under similar experimental conditions. Voluntary written informed consent was obtained from each of the subjects before enlisting them for the study. None of the female subjects were on oral contraceptives, and the study was conducted in their mid-luteal phase.
Results
A total of 34 OCD patients and 18 healthy control subjects were studied. There were no significant differences between the two study populations. The mean age of the patient group was 30.8±5.6 and that of the control group was 28.4±4.1. The male:female ratios in the patient group and control group were 22:12 and 10:8 respectively. The mean duration of illness was 4.23±1.64 years. On the LOI (Cooper, 1970), prior to administration of the challenge, the mean symptom score was 33.4±6.8, the mean
Discussion
This study was designed to further investigate the neuroendocrine and behavioral effects of PO mCPP when administered to patients with OCD.
The blunted cortisol response to mCPP challenge in OCD patients as noted by the present study is in direct concordance with the observations of Zohar et al. (1987) and Hollander et al. (1991) who had employed a similar methodology. However the results are at variance with few other studies that found no differences in cortisol response to mCPP challenge
References (51)
- et al.
Noradrenergic receptor sensitivity in obsessive–compulsive disorder: I. Growth hormone response to clonidine stimulation
Psychiatry Research
(1997) - et al.
Noradrenergic receptor sensitivity in obsessive–compulsive disorder: II. Cortisol response to acute clonidine administration
Psychiatry Research
(1997) - et al.
The effect of caffeine on plasma MHPG, subjective anxiety, autonomic symptoms and blood pressure in healthy humans
Life Sciences
(1984) - et al.
m–Chlorophenylpiperazine in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder: absence of symptom exacerbation
Biological Psychiatry
(1995) - et al.
1–mCPP interactions with neurotransmitter receptors in human brain
Biological Psychiatry
(1989) - et al.
Effects of chronic fluoxetine treatment on behavioral and neuroendocrine responses to meta–chlorophenylpiperazine in obsessive–compulsive disorder
Psychiatry Research
(1991) - et al.
mCPP as a probe of serotonin function
Biological Psychiatry
(1991) - et al.
Metergoline blocks the behavioral and neuroendocrine effects of orally administered m–chlorophenylpiperazine in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder
Biological Psychiatry
(1991) - et al.
A comparison of behavioral effects of oral versus intravenous mCPP administration in OCD patients, and the effect of metergoline prior to IV mCPP
Biological Psychiatry
(1993) - et al.
Biological challenges in obsessive–compulsive disorder
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
(1988)
Role of serotonin in obsessive–compulsive disorder
British Journal of Psychiatry
Serotonin function in anxiety. II. Effects of the serotonin agonist mCPP in panic disorder patients and healthy subjects
Psychopharmacology
Serotonin function in OCD: a comparison of the effects of tryptophan and mCPP in patients and healthy subjects
Archives of General Psychiatry
The Leyton Obsessional Inventory
Psychological Medicine
Biochemical changes during clomipramine treatment of childhood OCD
Archives of General Psychiatry
Cross-cultural study of the psychiatric syndromes in outpatient clinics in Bombay, India and Topeka, Kansas
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Rating scales for obsessive–compulsive disorders
Efficacy of fluvoxamine in obsessive compulsive disorder. A double-blind comparison with placebo
Archives of General Psychiatry
Pharmacologic challenges in obsessive–compulsive disorder
Lactate infusions in obsessive–compulsive disorder
American Journal of Psychiatry
Cultural aspects of obsessive–compulsive disorder
Scrupulosity: religious attitudes and clinical presentations
British Journal of Medical Psychology
Efficacy and tolerability of serotonin transport inhibitors in obsessive–compulsive disorder
Archives of General Psychiatry
A rating scale for depression
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
Cited by (49)
Meta-Chlorophenylpiperazine-Induced Behavioral Changes in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Research: A Systematic Review of Rodent Studies
2022, NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :Clinical studies in which mCPP was administered to OCD patients and/or healthy controls vary in their findings. Some studies have shown that mCPP induces or exacerbates OCD symptoms (Zohar and Insel, 1987; Hollander et al., 1991; Pigott et al., 1993; Broocks et al., 1998; Erzegovesi et al., 2001; Gross-Isseroff et al., 2004), while others reported no effect on obsessive or compulsive responses (Charney et al., 1988; Kahn et al., 1990; Goodman et al., 1995; Khanna et al., 2001; de Leeuw and Westenberg, 2008). The effects of mCPP have generally been tested in response to acute oral (0.5 mg/kg) or intravenous (0.1 mg/kg) administration and differences in patient sample heterogeneity are raised as possible explanations for discrepancies in results between studies.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Insights from animal models
2017, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsCitation Excerpt :Further, although direct and indirect acting DA agonists exacerbate obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms, they may also improve such symptoms (Denys et al., 2004). Concerning 5-HT, despite the clinical efficacy of SSRI’s, broad-spectrum 5-HT agonists may exacerbate OCD symptoms (Hollander et al., 1991) or not (Khanna et al., 2001). Similarly, paradoxical data are observed with 5HT1D agonists, while 5HT1A and 5HT2C receptor agonists have no effect on OC symptom severity (Aouizerate et al., 2005).
New therapeutic opportunities for 5-HT<inf>2C</inf> receptor ligands in neuropsychiatric disorders
2016, Pharmacology and TherapeuticsPlasma cytokine abnormalities in drug-naïve, comorbidity-free obsessive-compulsive disorder
2015, Psychiatry ResearchObsessive-Compulsive Disorder
2014, Pathobiology of Human Disease: A Dynamic Encyclopedia of Disease MechanismsNeurotrophic factors in obsessive-compulsive disorder
2012, Psychiatry Research