ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Theoretical Computer Science
Volume 250, Issues 1-2, 6 January 2001, Pages 125-141
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (224 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(99)00126-7    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

A practical algorithm for making filled graphs minimal*1

Jean R. S. BlairE-mail The Corresponding Author, a, Pinar HeggernesCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, b and Jan Arne TelleE-mail The Corresponding Author, b

a US Military Academy, West Point, NY, USA b Department of Informatics, University of Bergen, 5020 Bergen, Norway

Received 1 February 1998;
revised 1 February 1999.
Communicated by M. Nivat
Available online 27 October 2000.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

For an arbitrary filled graph G+ of a given original graph G, we consider the problem of removing fill edges from G+ in order to obtain a graph M that is both a minimal filled graph of G and a subgraph of G+. For G+ with f fill edges and e original edges, we give a simple O(f(e+f)) algorithm which solves the problem and computes a corresponding minimal elimination ordering of G. We report on experiments with an implementation of our algorithm, where we test graphs G corresponding to some real sparse matrix applications and apply well-known and widely used ordering heuristics to find G+. Our findings show the amount of fill that is commonly removed by a minimalization for each of these heuristics, and also indicate that the runtime of our algorithm on these practical graphs is better than the presented worst-case bound.


 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.