ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Theoretical Computer Science
Volume 237, Issues 1-2, 28 April 2000, Pages 477-483
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (86 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(00)00008-6    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Note

On the rigidity of Vandermonde matrices

Satyanarayana V. Lokam1, E-mail The Corresponding Author

Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Loyola University Chicago, 6525 N. Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL 60626, USA

Received 1 June 1999;
revised 1 November 1999.
Communicated by A. Razborov.
Available online 9 July 2001.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

The rigidity function Image of a matrix A is the minimum number of entries of A that must be changed to reduce the rank of A to less than or equal to r. While almost all matrices have rigidity close to (nr)2, proving strong lower bounds on the rigidity of explicit matrices is a fundamental open question with several consequences in complexity theory. A natural class of matrices expected to have high rigidity is that of Vandermonde matrices V=(xij−1)1less-than-or-equals, slanti,jless-than-or-equals, slantn. However, even when the xi are algebraically independent, it was not known if Image for nonconstant r. We prove that for any constant c<1, there exists a constant var epsilon>0 such that if Image , then Image , when the xi are algebraically independent. Although not explicit, this provides a natural n-dimensional manifold in the space of n×n matrices with Ω(n2) rigidity for nonconstant r. Our proof is based on a technique due to Shoup and Smolensky (Comput. Complexity 6(4) (1997) 301–311).

For explicit Vandermonde matrices, the best-known lower bound is Image , when log2 nless-than-or-equals, slantrless-than-or-equals, slantn/2, which follows from a result of Shokrollahi et al. (Inform. Process. Lett. 64(6) (1997) 283–285).

Author Keywords: Matrix rigidity; Arithmetic circuits; Vandermonde matrix


 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.