A comparison of reproductive patterns in epifaunal and infaunal gammaridean amphipodsa

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-3524(80)80012-0Get rights and content

Comparisons of egg size and number are made for 10 epifaunal and 16 infaunal species of shallow-water marine or estuarine gammaridean amphipods from the north-western Atlantic. Epifaunal species have significantly more, smaller eggs than infaunal species of the same size and geographic region. Strong latitudinal and seasonal effects are also evident. For several species, egg size increases and egg number decreases in populations at more northern latitudes and in populations breeding during colder seasons. The few exceptions to the above patterns may reflect unique differences in the biology of particular species. A hypothesis is proposed that adult mortality risk is correlated positively with egg number and inversely with egg size.

References (55)

  • DexterD.M.

    Life history of the sandy-beach amphipod Neohaustorius schmitzi (Crustacea: Haustoriidae)

    Marine Biology

    (1971)
  • EffordI.E.

    Recruitment to sedentary marine populations as exemplified by the sand crab Emerita analoga (Decapoda, Hippidae)

    Crustaceana

    (1970)
  • EnequistP.

    Studies on the soft bottom amphipods of the Skagerak

    Zoologiska Bidrag Fran Uppsala

    (1950)
  • KerfootW.C.

    Competition in cladoceran communities: The cost of evolving defenses against copepod predation

    Ecology

    (1977)
  • LawlorL.R.

    Parental investment and offspring fitness in the terrestrial isopod Armadillidium vulgare (Latr.) (Crustacea: Oniscoidea)

    Evolution

    (1976)
  • MacArthurR.H. et al.
  • McLarenI.A.

    Predicting development rate of copepod eggs

    Biological Bulletin

    (1966)
  • MengeJ.L. et al.

    Role of resource allocation, aggression, and spatial heterogeneity in coexistence of two competing intertidal starfish

    Ecological Monographs

    (1974)
  • MileikovskyS.A.

    Types of larval development in marine bottom invertebrates, their distribution and ecological significance: A reevaluation

    Marine Biology

    (1971)
  • MillsE.L.

    The biology of an ampeliscid amphipod crustacean sibling species pair

    Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada

    (1967)
  • NagleJ.S.

    Distribution of the epibiota of macroepibenthic plants

    Contributions in Marine Science, University of Texas Marine Institute

    (1968)
  • NelsonW.G.

    The community ecology of seagrass amphipods: Predation and community structure, life histories, and biogeography

  • NelsonW.G.

    Reproductive patterns in gammaridean amphipods

    Sarsia

    (1980)
  • OrthR.J.

    The importance of sediment stability in seagrass communities

  • PiankaE.R.

    On r- and K-selection

    American Naturalist

    (1970)
  • PriceP.W.

    Strategies for egg production

    Evolution

    (1974)
  • ReiseK.

    Predation pressure and community structure of an intertidal soft-bottom fauna

  • Cited by (61)

    • Population genetic structure of two congeneric deep-sea amphipod species from geographically isolated hadal trenches in the Pacific Ocean

      2017, Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers
      Citation Excerpt :

      Indeed, a lack of understanding of fundamental life history parameters in Paralicella makes it difficult to explain the mechanism through which gene flow is facilitated over large geographical distances between trenches. It is known that Paralicella, in line with the majority of deep sea scavenging amphipods, does not have a larval dispersal phase (Dolah and Bird, 1980) that would promote dispersal over large distances within the plankton. This would therefore point to dispersal and gene flow being mediated through either the movement of juveniles or adults.

    • Predicting the variation in Echinogammarus marinus at its southernmost limits under global warming scenarios: Can the sex-ratio make a difference?

      2014, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Studies on marine invertebrates reported changes in population dynamics and reproductive biology to address stressful conditions caused by climate variations. These specific strategies involve shifts in the following factors: lifespan (Berezina and Gubelit, 2012); life cycles (Donn and Croker, 1986; Wildish, 1984; Sainte-Marie, 1991; Beaugrand et al., 2002); reproductive patterns (Van Dolah and Bird, 1980; Kolding and Fenchel, 1981; Skadsheim, 1984; Pardal et al., 2000), and sex-ratio (the proportion of males to females) (Vlasblom, 1969; Moore, 1981; Wildish, 1997; Lawrence and Soame, 2004). By exploring these effects of climate variation within a site, we can place this information in the context of larger scale variation (e.g., global climate change).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    a

    Contribution No. 112 from the South Carolina Marine Resources Center, Charleston, South Carolina 29412, U.S.A.

    View full text