Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 42, Issue 1, July 2002, Pages 43-48
European Urology

Conservative Management of Upper Urinary Tract Tumors

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00220-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose: We determined the immediate and long-term results of endoscopic management of upper tract transitional cell in regard to rates of tumor recurrence and preservation of renal function.

Materials and Methods: From January 1990 to July 1999, 61 patients (mean age 66.2 years) underwent endoscopic management of upper tract cell carcinoma. Of the patients 20 (32%) had a solitary kidney. Tumors were resected in a one time procedure by ureteroscopy only in 31.5%, by percutaneous nephroscopy in 29% or both in 8%; multiple treatment was necessary in 31.5% of cases using percutaneous nephroscopy only.

Results: Immediate nephrectomy was done in six cases for high grade (three patients), insufficient local control (two cases) or patient’s choices (one case). There were six cases of benign tumors excluded from survival Kaplan Meier analysis. With a mean follow-up of 39.9 months, the rate of kidney preservation, recurrence free rate, global survival and specific survival rates were, respectively, 81%, 68%, 77%, and 84%.

Conclusions: Nephron sparing percutaneous management of upper tract cell carcinoma is applicable in a significant number of patients with a filling defect of upper urinary tract TCC. In carefully selected patients the results are at least comparable to other forms of management of tumor control and preservation of renal function.

Introduction

Upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma is an uncommon tumor. It is widely accepted that nephroureterectomy with removal of a bladder cuff is the standard treatment for non-metastatic disease because of high recurrence rates noted in less extensive surgical operations [1]. However, more recent epidemiological data on upper tract tumors show that in most cases these tumors are low grade and noninvasive with low recurrence and lymph node extension rates partly due to early detection [2], [3]. In these cases, a conservative approach of upper urinary tract TCC may be discussed accordingly to progression risk, patient co-morbidity, particularly regarding renal function and treatment feasibility.

Contemporary attempts at conservative surgery for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma have emerged in the recent years. Nephron sparing approaches include percutaneous nephroscopy and retrograde ureteroscopy with tumor resection or thermal destruction [4], [5], [6]. Retrospective analysis suggest that patients with low grade and low stage tumors benefit from a conservative management without increasing the risk of recurrence and metastasis [7], [8], [9]. We report our clinical experience on the endoscopic management of 61 consecutive patients with a filling defect of the upper urinary tract and no evidence of local invasion who had an endoscopic resection and were followed at our centre. In this study, we analysed rates of kidney conservation, risk of recurrences and progression with a mean follow-up of 39.9 months.

Section snippets

Patient population and inclusion criteria

From March 1990 to December 1999, 61 consecutive patients (mean age 66.2 years) referred to the Clinic of Urology at the Edouard Herriot University Hospital in Lyon, with a history of an upper urinary tract filling defect, were primarily treated by a conservative endoscopic approach. Preoperative workup included an IVP, CT scan, urinary cytology, and general medical patient evaluation. Patients presenting with an upper tract malignancy with a high risk of local invasion based on CT scan or

Results

From January 1990 to July 1999, 207 patients who had a tumor of the upper urinary tract were evaluated at our institution. Among them, 61 had a filling defect without radiological evidence of local extension on CT scan, with a low grade or negative cytology and a tumor of less than 3 cm were treated by endoscopic procedures. In most cases (n=41; 68%) patients had a normal opposite functioning kidney representing elective indications for conservative management, however, one patient had a

Discussion

Early reports have shown that endoscopic treatment of upper urinary tract TCC was feasible and reproducible with an acceptable local control in well selected patients (Table 4). Results of the latest retrospective studies show that in six well experimented centers an average of 35 (S.D.=14.9) patients were treated in a mean period of 11 years. Elective indications represent the majority of patients (54.4%). Tumor grade is the most important prognosis criterion. The average rate of kidney

Acknowledgements

We thank “La Ligue du Rhone” for its financial support and Stortz for long term technical advices at improving our endoscopic armamentarium.

References (26)

Cited by (76)

  • Complications Associated With Ureteroscopic Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

    2021, Urology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Five studies reported ureteral perforation, at rates of 1.3%,24 4.4%,26 2.7%,25, 33 and 7.4%.31 Bleeding was reported as a complication in 8 studies.7,15,19,25,26,29,31,35 In these studies incidence rates of bleeding ranged from 1.6%19 to 8.1%.25

  • Percutaneous Approach of Upper Urinary Tract Tumors

    2016, Percutaneous Surgery of the Upper Urinary Tract: Handbook of Endourology
  • Papillary ureteral neoplasm of low malignant potential in the upper urinary tract: Endoscopic treatment

    2014, Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
    Citation Excerpt :

    High morbidity and kidney loss prompted urologists to have second thoughts in cases of low-risk tumors.11,12 With technologic advances, small-caliber devices, and development of fiber technology, endoscopic treatment became more popular in treatment of upper ureteral tumors.13,14 Especially in small tumors and resectable tumors, in a solitary site, with a low grade in cytology and pathology, and the lack of proof of invasion are the indications of endoscopic treatment.1

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text