Hotel cleanliness—how do guests view it? Let us get specific. A New Zealand study
Introduction
Over the years numerous research projects have been undertaken to measure the factors that influence the selection of accommodation by guests. Callan (1996) identified 166 hotel attributes under the headings of: (1) Location, (2) Image, (3) Price/value, (4) Competence, (5) Access, (6) Security, (7) Additional services, (8) Tangibles-bedroom, (9) Tangibles-other, (10) Leisure facilities and (11) Service provider. Dube and Renaghan (1999) surveyed 469 frequent users of hotels, and identified the reported most frequent benefit as “no-worry, hassle-free stay”. This was followed by “Having a comfortable stay” and two items shared the third place: “Having an enjoyable experience” and “General sense of satisfaction”. Other studies have focused on specific areas of the accommodation market: Ananth et al. (1992) investigated the needs of mature travellers, while other researchers have considered the needs of business guests (Gundersen et al., 1996; McCleary et al., 1993; Weaver and Oh, 1993; Lockyer, 2000). Of the many studies undertaken, there is in many of them a strong indication that cleanliness is a very important, if not the most important, factor in the selection of accommodation (Callan, 1996; Weaver and Oh, 1993; Saleh and Ryan, 1992; McCleary and Weaver 1992; Mehta and Vera, 1990; Lewis, 1987). What has not received academic research are the specific areas of a hotel or motel that are indications of cleanliness and how potential guests view such items as the toilet, the floor of the shower, the odour etc, and how important these items are, along with a comparison to performance.
Although some progress was made by Callan (1997), Callan (1998) in relation to attributes of cleanliness, this research did not look particularly at cleanliness itself, rather at many areas of guest satisfaction with accommodation providers.
Knowing those attributes that determine guest selection of accommodation is of extreme importance to the hospitality industry. Understanding those features that are perceived as important can lead to higher customer satisfaction and assist accommodation providers in their day-to-day decisions on which areas are important within the property.
Section snippets
Methodology
New Zealand is a small country located in the South Pacific Ocean, southeast of Australia. Its land size is 268,670 km2 (similar in size to the USA state of California, or Japan). It has a temperate climate with sharp regional contrasts. Approximately 80% of the population live in cities. The capital is Wellington, its second largest city. Although it could be argued that research from such a remote country might have little international relevance, the makeup of the population, while small (3.8
Results
The data were analysed for sample reliability and adequacy. Using split half modelling on the ‘importance’ scales the Guttman split-half correlation was 0.89, which is usually perceived as a good result. The alpha coefficients for each half were 0.92 and 0.95, indicating internal consistency within the data set. The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin test of sample adequacy was 0.94, classified as ‘marvellous’ (Ryan, 1995, p. 256). From these statistical tests it can be concluded that the sample data possess
Discussion and relevance to management
An important element in the management of accommodation is understanding the needs of guests. This gives management the opportunity to put their (often limited) resources to the best advantage. There is strong evidence that, among the many factors that might influence the selection of accommodation by guests, cleanliness is very important.
However to say that cleanliness is the most important factor in the selection of accommodation is to pose a significant question: that of what specifically in
References (17)
- et al.
Marketplace lodging needs of mature travellers
Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly
(1992) The measurement of gaps in the quality of hotel services
International Journal of Hospitality Management
(1987)- et al.
Segmentation in Singapore
The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly
(1990) - 2001 Census, 2002. Statistics New...
An appraisement of UK business travelers’ perceptions of important hotel attributes
Hospitality Research Journal
(1996)An attributional approach to hotel selection. Part 1the managers’ perceptions
Progress Tourism and Hospitality Research
(1997)An attributional approach to hotel selection. Part 2the customers’ perceptions
Progress Tourism and Hospitality Research
(1998)- et al.
Naturally Intelligent Systems
(1990)
Cited by (85)
Subconscious influences on perceived cleanliness in hospitality settings
2021, International Journal of Hospitality ManagementAn optimisation approach to road sanitation workforce planning using differential evolution
2020, Journal of Urban ManagementCitation Excerpt :The objective of this study was to establish how the road sanitation workforce planning problem could be solved using a multi-objective optimisation model, and in particular, to introduce a unique optimisation solver, differential evolution algorithm, to solve a non-linear association among the road sanitation maintenance workforce variables. Besides, the work is informed by three objective functions of maximization of cleanliness (Amblee, 2015; Lockyer, 2003; Vos et al., 2019), maximization of worker's effectiveness (ISF-UTS & SNV, 2016) and minimization of traffic obstruction. Although road maintenance activities involving the maintenance of signs (i.e. regulatory, guides and warning), pavements (i.e. flexible, semi-rigid and rigid), bridges, paving, drainages, cutting and filling of slopes have been established and examined in previous studies (Agarwal et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2020; Conreras-Nieto et al., 2019; Issa & Abu-Eisheh, 2017; Mansour et al., 2019), there is a paucity of contributions to uncover knowledge on road sanitation maintenance in the developing country's context.
Reducing perceived health risk to attract hotel customers in the COVID-19 pandemic era: Focused on technology innovation for social distancing and cleanliness
2020, International Journal of Hospitality ManagementMeasuring perceived cleanliness in service environments: Scale development and validation
2019, International Journal of Hospitality ManagementCitation Excerpt :The aim of the focus group discussion was to verify and operationalize the findings of our literature review. The first set of items was compiled from previous research on perceived cleanliness (Barber and Scarcelli, 2010; Lockyer, 2003; Whatley et al., 2012; Whitehead et al., 2007). We then invited to a focus-group discussion seven experienced members of a fixed customer panel of a Dutch railway company, each with an academic background (four frequent and three infrequent customers, aged 30 to 66).
Do guests care more about hotel cleanliness during COVID-19? Understanding factors associated with cleanliness importance of hotel guests
2024, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality ManagementPromoting Guest Satisfaction: Digital Platforms as a Means to Encourage Economic Development in Hospitality
2024, International Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Administration