Nephrology Ethics ForumWhat is our duty to a “hateful” patient? Differing approaches to a disruptive dialysis patient
Section snippets
Case presentation
A 21-year-old black man presented to Boston Medical Center (BMC) with chronic renal failure. He had used intravenous heroin for many years and doctors believed his renal failure was caused by focal glomerulosclerosis secondary to intravenous drug abuse. The patient had fluid retention and severe hypertension, with diastolic pressures usually in the range of 110 to 115 mmHg. No evidence existed of damage from hypertension to organs other than the kidneys; he had grade II retinopathy. During the
Levinsky's approach
Dr Norman G. Levinsky: I recognize the exceptional difficulties that the caregivers faced in dealing with this verbally abusive and disruptive patient over many years. Nevertheless, I disagree with the ultimate decision to terminate regular dialysis and offer him only emergency medical care.
One of the most familiar maxims about the practice of medicine is that of Francis W. Peabody, who wrote that “the secret of the care of the patient is in caring for the patient.”1 It was difficult to care
Friedman's approach
Dr Eli A. Friedman: Noncompliance in medicine is a vaguely defined concept applied to treatment circumstances in which patients do not follow a prescribed regimen. Although health care professionals pro forma blame noncompliance on patients, Smirnow and others14 correctly attribute the genesis of many noncompliant behaviors to improper or unempathetic actions by the professional staff. In diabetic individuals constrained by regulated meals, activity, and insulin doses, Lutfey and Wishner view a
Conclusion
Returning to the case at hand and applying the concerns of an ethicist as formulated by Beauchamp and Childress,49 medical care must be delivered under the umbrella of respect for autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice. Spital50 discussed application of these principles to a specific case in an earlier AJKD Nephrology Ethics Forum. The patient presented in the current Forum retained autonomy, was not subjected to any harmful procedure or medication, was treated by physicians who
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgment: The AJKD Ethics Editor is warmly appreciative of those who suffered through discussions and pleas for assistance during preparation of this discourse. Especially helpful were: John D. Bower, MD, Richard L. Friedman, Esq, Norman B. Levy, MD, Alvin H. Moss, MD, and Robert J. Pristave, Esq.
References (51)
Ethical issues in the initiation and termination of treatment
Am J Kidney Dis
(1990)- et al.
The use of mediation to manage patient-staff conflict in the dialysis clinic
Adv Ren Replace Ther
(1997) - et al.
Working with noncompliant and abusive dialysis patients: Practical strategies based on ethics and the law
Adv Ren Replace Ther
(1996) - et al.
Excess morbidity in patients starting uremia therapy without prior care by a nephrologist
Am J Kidney Dis
(1996) Psychological factors associated with severe abuse of the hemodialysis diet
Gen Hosp Psychiat
(1981)- et al.
Evaluation of an ethics consultation service: Patient and family perspective
Am J Med
(1996) - et al.
Evaluation of a medical ethics consultation service: Opinions of patients and health care providers
Am J Med
(1996) The psychological society. The impact—and the failure—of psychiatry, psychotherapy, psychoanalysis and the psychological revolution
(1978)The care of the patient
JAMA
(1927)Taking care of the hateful patient
N Engl J Med
(1978)
Treatment compliance in end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis
Am J Nephrol
Invited Editorial: Mediation for challenging patients—A promising approach
Adv Ren Replace Ther
Implications for health care policy: A social and demographic profile of hemodialysis patients in the United States
JAMA
Denying treatment to the noncompliant patient
JAMA
Protecting patients from discrimination—The Americans with Disabilities Act and HIV infection
N Engl J Med
The assaultive patient
Dialysis Transplant
When they're less than cooperative
Dialysis Transplant
Beyond “compliance” is “adherence.” Improving the prospect of diabetes care
Diabetes Care
Non-compliance: Failure of the therapeutic partnership
Cardiovasc Med
Compliance and noncompliance in patients with a functioning renal transplant: A multi-center study
Transplantation
Working with noncompliant and abusive patients
Genetic influence on the psychoses
Br Med Bull
Predicting noncompliance to fluid restrictions in hemodialysis patients
Dialysis Transplant
Cited by (14)
The hateful patient revisited: Relevance for 21st century medicine
2006, European Journal of Internal MedicineEthics and nephrology. Consensus of the Spanish Society of Dialysis and Transplantation (SEDYT)
2006, Dialisis y TrasplanteThe frequency and significance of the "difficult" patient: The nephrology community's perceptions
2004, Advances in Chronic Kidney DiseaseEthical issues in organ harvest and distribution
2003, Transplantation ProceedingsRepetitive foreign body ingestion: Ethical considerations
2013, Journal of Clinical Ethics
Address correspondence to David Z. Levine, MD, AJKD Ethics Forum Editor, Division of Nephrology, Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ste N-8, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8L6. E-mail: [email protected]