doi:10.1016/S0263-8231(02)00029-0
Copyright © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Buckling behavior of cold-formed zed-purlins partially restrained by steel sheeting
Zhi-ming Yea, Roger J. Kettleb, Long-yuan Li
,
, b and Benjamin W. Schaferc
a Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200072, PR China
b School of Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK
c Department of Civil Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
Received 15 September 2001;
revised 26 April 2002;
accepted 26 April 2002.
Available online 23 July 2002.
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
Abstract
This paper presents a study on the buckling behaviour of purlin-sheeting systems under wind uplift loading. The restraint provided by the sheeting to the purlin is modeled by using two springs representing the translational and rotational restraints. The analysis is performed using finite strip methods in which the pre-buckling stress is calculated based on the same model used for the buckling analysis rather than taken as the ‘pure bending’ stress. The results obtained from this study show that, for both local and distortional buckling, the restraints have significant influence on the critical loads through their influence on the pre-buckling stress rather than directly on the buckling modes. While for lateral-torsional buckling, the influence of the restraints on the critical loads is mainly due to their influence on the buckling modes rather than the pre-buckling stress.
Author Keywords: Cold-formed; Purlin; Steel; Thin-walled; Restrained; Sheeting; Buckling; Instability
Fig. 1. Analytical model of purlin-sheeting system. (a) purlin-sheeting system, (b) analytical model, (c) coordinate system, (d) degrees of freedom of displacements.
Fig. 2. Distribution of pre-buckling stress for different loading and restraint cases (L=5 m, tensile stress is plotted above the flange or on the right side of web or lips).
Fig. 3. Relationship between critical stress and the half-wave length (L=5 m, a=b/2, ks=20.5 N/m, kr=7380 kN-mm).
Fig. 4. Buckling curves for different restraint cases (L=5 m, a=b/2).
Fig. 5. Normalized buckling curves for different restraint cases (L=5 m, a=b/2).
Fig. 6. Normalized buckling curves for different restraint cases (L=5 m, a=b/2).
Fig. 7. Buckling curves for different loading points (L=5 m, ks=20.5 N/m, kr=73.8 N-mm).
Fig. 8. Influence of span length on critical loads (a=b/2, ks=20.5 N/m, kr=73.8 N-mm).
Table 1. Normalized maximum compressive stress (L=5 m)
