ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Personality and Individual Differences
Volume 32, Issue 7, May 2002, Pages 1199-1213
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (161 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
Special issue
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00086-1    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism

Bart DuriezCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, a and Alain Van Hielb

a Department of Psychology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium b Department of Developmental and Personality Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium

Received 22 September 2000; 
revised 4 April 2001. 
Available online 4 April 2002.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

In the present study, we tried to identify variables that are differently related to social dominance orientation (SDO) and authoritarianism. A strong positive relationship between SDO and authoritarianism was found and both variables showed strong positive correlations with racism. Nevertheless, results support the idea that SDO and authoritarianism refer to different kinds of dispositional prejudice. Authoritarianism, when statistically corrected for SDO, was negatively associated with level of education, moral competence, relativism, and the values hedonism, stimulation and self-direction, whereas positive correlations with age, cultural conservatism, orthodoxy, and the values tradition, conformity and security were registered. In contrast, SDO, when corrected for authoritarianism, was negatively associated with age, second naiveté and the values universalism, benevolence and tradition, whereas economic conservatism, external critique, and the values power, achievement, hedonism and stimulation showed positive relationships. It is argued that SDO represents a more modern kind of prejudice than authoritarianism.

Author Keywords: Authoritarianism; Conservatism; Racism; Religiosity; Social dominance orientation; Values

Article Outline

1. Introduction
1.1. SDO, authoritarianism and values
1.2. SDO, authoritarianism and religiosity
1.3. SDO, authoritarianism, cultural conservatism and economic conservatism
1.4. SDO, authoritarianism, age, level of education and moral competence
2. Method
2.1. Participants
2.2. Measures
3. Results
4. Discussion
References



 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.