4 Practical applications of bounded-influence tests

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7161(97)15006-4Get rights and content

Publisher Summary

This chapter discusses the practical applications of bounded-influence tests. The robust versions of classical likelihood ratio, Wald or score tests, are now available in a general setting. They are more reliable than their classical counterparts—that is, they are not influenced by small deviations from the underlying model and can also be used as useful diagnostic tools to identify influential or outlying data points. The chapter illustrates their performance to show that they can be easily implemented in different practical situations. They can be used to robustly choose a model when the hypotheses are non-nested. That is when the model under the null hypothesis cannot be obtained as a particular or limiting case of the model under the alternative hypothesis. The approach followed is the approach based on the influence function. It is mainly concerned with the local robustness properties of tests. A parametric model is considered to study the effects of departures from the model on the testing procedures. The chapter also discusses robust testing in generalized linear models (or GLIM) and emphasizes the use of robust tests in logistic regression. As typical examples, the Food–Stamp data analyzed by Stefanski, Carroll, and Ruppert and the data introduced by Cormier, Magnan, and Morard in auditing is used.

References (36)

  • AtkinsonA.C.

    A method for discriminating between models

    J. Roy. Statist. Soc.

    (1970)
  • BoritzJ.E.

    The going concern assumption: Accounting and auditing implications

  • BreuschT.S. et al.

    The Lagrange multiplier test and its application to model specification in econometrics

    Rev. Econom. Stud.

    (1980)
  • CarrollR.J. et al.

    On robustness in the logistic regression model

    J. Roy. Statist. Soc.

    (1993)
  • CormierD. et al.

    An evaluation of the going concern assumption in an auditing context: Some empirical evidence

    J. Account. Finance

    (1993)
  • CoxD.R.

    Tests of separate families of hypotheses

  • CoxD.R.

    Further results on tests of separate families of hypotheses

    J. Roy. Statist. Soc.

    (1962)
  • DavidsonR. et al.

    Several tests for model specification in presence of alternative hypotheses

    Econometrica

    (1981)
  • Cited by (3)

    View full text