Sensitivity of LiF : Mg, Ti thermoluminescence detectors after various annealing procedures

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(97)00487-4Get rights and content

Abstract

The extensively studied impact of the thermal treatment on the LiF : Mg, Ti glow-curve structure is attributed to the clustering and precipitation of the Mg impurities, according to the reaction sequence; Free Mg2+V ⇋ dipoles ⇋ trimers ⇋ precipitates. Experimentally, this reaction is investigated by increasing the ageing temperature from room temperature up to 400° C. In the present work this reaction is examined toward its opposite direction, i.e. by decreasing the ageing temperature from 400°C to room temperature. Under this thermal treatment the sensitivity of the main glow-peak 5 is reduced by 60%, whereas the sensitivities of the glow-peak 2–4 are stable between 400°C and 200°C and then drop rapidly by a factor of 3, 5.5 and 1.53, respectively. A separate experiment was performed, which showed that during the readout precipitates are not formed.

References (21)

  • G. Kitis et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth.

    (1990)
  • G. Kitis et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1994)
  • X.L. Yuan et al.

    Phys. Status Solidi A

    (1988)
  • D.W. Zimmerman et al.

    Health Phys.

    (1996)
  • P. Spanne et al.
  • J.S. Dryden et al.

    J. Phys. D

    (1973)
  • G.C. Taylor et al.

    J. Phys. D

    (1982)
  • G.C. Taylor et al.

    J. Phys. D

    (1982)
  • G. Kitis et al.

    Radiat. Prot. Dosim.

    (1992)
  • T.M. Piters et al.

    Radiat. Prot. Dosim.

    (1996)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (2)

  • Thermoluminescence response of various dosimeters as a function of irradiation temperature

    2020, Radiation Physics and Chemistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    As for the TLD-600, there is an increase in the intensity of the high temperature peaks by 120%, whereas the MTS-700 peaks increase by 25%. Table 2 is presented for two different reasons: a) to show all the kinetic parameters that were yielded according to the deconvolution analysis, including the activation energy, the Tm values and the frequency factor S; as these are already known by previous studies (Kitis and Tuyn (1997); Kitis and Otto (2000); Sadek et al. (2017)), the agreement with the bibliography is an additional indicator that the analysis of the current study is trustworthy, b) to compare the aforementioned features between the two LiF families. Having in mind these two reasons, Table 2 shows that the activation energies of all 8 peaks of the Harhsaw LiF family are the same throughout the entire annealing temperature range.

  • Peculiarities of the glow-peak 5a of LiF:Mg,Ti

    2000, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
View full text