ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Future Generation Computer Systems
Volume 19, Issue 6, August 2003, Pages 983-997
3rd biennial International Grid applications-driven testbed event, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 23-26 September 2002
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (536 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/S0167-739X(03)00076-1    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

Grid-enabled particle physics event analysis: experiences using a 10 Gb, high-latency network for a high-energy physics application

W. AllcockCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, a, J. Bresnahana, J. Bunnb, S. Hegded, J. Insleya, R. Kettimuthue, H. Newmanb, S. Ravotb, T. Rimovskyc, C. Steenbergb and L. Winklera

a Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, USA b California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA c National Center for Supercomputing Applications, Urbana, IL, USA d Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA e The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

Available online 14 June 2003.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

This paper examines issues encountered attempting to exploit a high-bandwidth, high-latency link in support of a high-energy physics (HEP) analysis application. The primary issue was that the TCP additive increase/multiplicative decrease (AIMD) algorithm is not suitable for “long fat networks”. While this is a known problem, the magnitude of the impact on application performance was much greater than anticipated. We were able to overcome much of the impact, by altering the AIMD coefficients. Such an approach, of course, is non-TCP compliant, and there was insufficient time to test the network friendliness of these modifications.

Author Keywords: Networks; DataGrid; Congestion avoidance; 10 GigE; Web100

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Overview
3. The fabric
3.1. The network
3.2. The DataGrid cluster
3.3. The dusty cluster
3.4. The Caltech cluster
3.5. The wonderland clusters
4. Software
4.1. Root
4.2. GridFTP
4.3. geeViz
5. Initial results and troubleshooting
5.1. Initial striped GridFTP transfer results
5.2. Problem localization
5.3. Sender-side TCP operation
5.3.1. Round trip time variance (RTTVAR)
5.3.2. Linux implementation issue
5.3.3. TCP additive increase/multiplicative decrease (AIMD) algorithm
5.3.4. The work around daemon (WAD)
6. Conclusions and future work
Acknowledgements
References
Vitae











Future Generation Computer Systems
Volume 19, Issue 6, August 2003, Pages 983-997
3rd biennial International Grid applications-driven testbed event, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 23-26 September 2002
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.