ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Volume 52, Issue 4, December 2003, Pages 553-571
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (188 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
Special issue
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00154-3    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2002 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

A naive but optimal route to Walrasian behavior in oligopolies

Weihong HuangE-mail The Corresponding Author

Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University, Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore

Received 8 August 2001; 
accepted 7 March 2002. ;
Available online 17 October 2002.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

A paradoxical phenomenon where irrationality or ignorance lead to higher profits is shown to prevail in an oligopolistic market where three firms produce a homogeneous product with identical technologies. Under the conventional assumption on the convexity of cost function, the profit made by a naive price-taker will always be higher than or at least as much as the other two rivals, no matter what kind of strategies the latter may take and whether they form a coalition or not. By sticking to the price-taking strategy, a firm always gains a positive profit improvement, should any one of its rivals try to upgrade from price-taker to the Cournotor. With these incentives, a firm prefers to remain as a naive price-taker.

Author Keywords: Competitive behavior; Price-taking; Duopoly; Oligopoly; Cournot; Cobweb

JEL classification codes: D14; L13; C73

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. The standard model and strategies
3. More sophisticated profit less!
4. Collusion does not work either!
5. A generic theorem
6. Becoming smarter may not pay!
7. Concluding remarks
Acknowledgements
Appendix A
Appendix B
References




 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.