ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Soil and Tillage Research
Volume 49, Issues 1-2, 17 November 1998, Pages 19-27
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (228 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(98)00151-2    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved

Crop production and soil water storage in long-term winter wheat–fallow tillage experiments

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Drew J. Lyona, *, Walter W. Stroupb and Randall E. Brownc

a  Panhandle Research and Extension Center, 4502 Avenue I Scottsbluff, NE 69361 USA

b  Panhandle Research and Extension Center, 103 Miller Hall, University of Nebraska 103 Miller Hall Lincoln, NE 68583-0712 USA

c  Panhandle Research and Extension Center, P.O. Box 786 Colby KS 67701-0786 USA


Received 24 September 1997;
accepted 3 April 1998.
Available online 3 December 1998.

Abstract

Soil water is the major limiting factor in dryland crop production in the Central Great Plains. No-till fallow management increases soil water storage and reduces soil erosion potential. Two experiments were initiated in 1969 and 1970 near Sidney, NE to compare effects of moldboard plow (Plow), sub-tillage (Sub-till) and no-tillage (No-till) fallow systems on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield, grain protein, residue production, and soil water accumulation during fallow. The first experiment was established in 1969 on an Alliance silt loam that had been previously cultivated prior to study initiation. This experiment contained a nitrogen (N) fertilizer split of 0 and 45 (kg N) ha−1 within each tillage treatment. The second experiment was established in 1970 on a Duroc loam that was in native mixed prairie sod. No fertilizer was applied at this site. At both sites, soil water storage was greatest with the no-till and least with the plow system. Winter wheat grain yields failed to consistently respond to increased soil water storage in the no-till system during the 24–26 years of the experiments. Grain yields with the plow system were 8% greater than with sub- and no-till systems at the Previously Cultivated site when N was not applied. The addition of N at this site eliminated yield differences due to fallow tillage systems. Grain protein averaged 13.8, 13.3 and 12.8% for all plow, sub- and no-till treatments, respectively. The addition of N at the Previously Cultivated site increased residue dry weights by an average of 5% in all tillage systems. Neither grain protein nor residue dry weights were affected by tillage system at the Native Sod site. Winter wheat–fallow is probably not a sustainable production system for the Central Great Plains, regardless of the fallow management system used.

Author Keywords: Triticum aestivum; No-till; Sub-till; Plow; Grain yield; Grain protein; Soil water

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Previously Cultivated site
2.2. Native Sod site
3. Results
3.1. Previously Cultivated site
3.2. Native Sod site
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References



*Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 308-632-1266; fax: +1 308-632-1365; e-mail address: agro139@unlvm.unl.edu


Soil and Tillage Research
Volume 49, Issues 1-2, 17 November 1998, Pages 19-27
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.