Copyright © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Received 5 June 2000;
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.
Abstract
If P(x1,…,xk) is a graph property expressible in monadic second-order logic, where x1,…,xk denote vertices, if G is a graph with n vertices and of clique-width at most p where p is fixed, then we can associate with each vertex u of G a piece of information I(u) of size O(log(n)) such that, for all vertices x1,…,xk of G, one can decide whether P(x1,…,xk) holds in time O(log(n)) by using only I(x1),…,I(xk). The preprocessing can be done in time O(nlog(n)).
One can do the same for any fixed monadic second-order optimization function (like distance) by using information of size O(log2(n)) for each vertex and computation time O(log2(n)). In this case preprocessing time is O(–log2(n)).
Clique-width is a complexity measure on graphs similar to tree-width, but more powerful since every set of graphs of bounded tree-width has bounded clique-width, but not conversely.
Similar results apply to graphs of tree-width at most w and to properties and functions expressed in the version of monadic second-order logic allowing quantifications on sets of edges.
Article Outline
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Definitions
- 2.1. Monadic second-order logic
- 2.2. Graphs
- 2.3. MS transduction
- 2.4. An example of MS transduction
- 3. Monadic second-order queries on trees
- 4. Balanced trees and terms
- 5. Efficient implementation of graph queries
- 5.1. Main theorems
- 5.2. Monadic second-order logic with edge set quantifications
- 5.3. The special case of distance
- 6. Conclusion
- References






E-mail Article
Add to my Quick Links

Cited By in Scopus (8)

[





