Brief report
The continuity of depression symptoms: Use of cluster analysis for profile identification in patient and student samples

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00253-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: Findings from several sources suggest that depression lies on a continuum whereby mild and severe variants are thought to differ in severity (i.e., quantitatively), but not in kind (i.e., qualitatively). The current study used cluster analysis to extend this work to examination of depression symptom profiles obtained in distressed student ‘analogue’ samples and clinically depressed samples. Method: Patients with major depressive disorder (n=101) provided seed points for the depressed cluster, and 176 non-distressed university students (Beck Depression Inventory score ≤8) provided seed points for the non-depressed cluster. The symptom profiles of three levels of analogue depressed samples were then evaluated (BDI≥9, BDI≥16, and BDI≥21). Results: Only 35.4% of BDI≥9 analogue respondents were empirically sorted to the depression cluster and the majority were assigned to the non-depressed cluster. The proportion assigned to the depression cluster increased to 70.5% and to 86.2% when higher BDI cutoffs of 16 and 21 were examined, respectively. The DSM-IV depression symptom profile of the BDI≥21 group was very similar to the profile defined by clinical patients. Limitations: The study relied solely on self-report to assess symptom severity. Conclusions: It is recommended that higher BDI cutoffs be utilized in analogue depression research than is currently common. On quantitative grounds, analogue subjects who were sorted to the clinically defined depression cluster seem to best represent the idea of depression continuity.

Section snippets

Participants

The clinically depressed sample consisted of 101 adult outpatients with a primary DSM-IV (APA, 1994) diagnosis of major depressive disorder (59 females, 42 males; mean age=44.39 years; S.D.=14.05). All patients were experiencing a DSM-IV-defined major depressive episode and were non-psychotic. Dysthymia (29%), panic disorder (21%) and social phobia (17%) were the most common comorbid conditions.

The non-clinical sample comprised 351 undergraduate university students. The analogue depressed group

Statistical recovery of clinically depressed patients and non-distressed students

It is important to establish the sensitivity of the clustering algorithm (i.e., its ability to identify known cases of depression) if cluster assignments are to be useful. Therefore, the DDS symptom profiles of the 101 clinically depressed patients were analyzed with the clustering procedure, to determine if a high percentage could be ‘recovered’. This requirement was met, with 96.0% being correctly classified. An identical procedure was employed with the non-distressed college students and

Discussion

The marked similarity of the prototypical cluster profiles of the non-depressed, analogue, and clinical samples is reflective of the qualitative similarity previously identified (Cox et al., 1999). The present results shed light on the nature of the quantitative differences in depression symptom continuity in non-clinical and clinical samples. The close match in the DSM-IV depression symptom profiles of the more conservatively selected analogue groups and their clinical counterparts is apparent

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by an operating grant from the Manitoba Health Research Council. The authors are grateful to Sharon Borger for assistance with data collection and analysis, and to Drs. Harvey Keselman and Keith Wilson for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (23)

  • The latent structure of depression symptoms and suicidal thoughts in Brazilian youths

    2019, Journal of Affective Disorders
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the present study, we expand the research on the latent structure of depression symptoms in a Latin American sample of children and adolescents by using a combination of latent profile and taxometric analysis. Apparently consistent with a categorical view of depression, many cluster analysis studies have uncovered discrete groups of individuals when analyzing data from symptoms of depression (Baldassin et al., 2013; Cox et al., 2001; Dorard et al., 2014; Ferdinand et al., 2005; Hybels et al., 2013; Schrader, 1995; van Lang et al., 2006). Groups were also reported when researchers analyzed data collected on suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts (Podlogar et al., 2017; Rapeli and Botega, 2005), postpartum depression (Campbell et al., 2009; Postpartum Depression: Action Towards Causes and Treatment (PACT) Consortium, 2015) and trajectories during the course of treatment for depression (Maalouf et al., 2012; Thibodeau et al., 2015).

  • The predictive power of subgroups: An empirical approach to identify depressive symptom patterns that predict response to treatment

    2014, Journal of Affective Disorders
    Citation Excerpt :

    Many different subtypes of depression have been proposed, of which a majority were derived from theoretical considerations (e.g. Lichtenberg and Belmaker, 2010; Spitzer et al., 1978). However, attempts have also been made to identify subgroups based on various statistical classification techniques (e.g. Aggen et al., 2005; Blazer et al., 1989; Cox et al., 2001); one of the most promising approaches was Latent Class Analysis (Carragher et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2000; Eaton et al., 1989; Kendler et al., 1996; Sullivan et al., 2002). To the best of the authors’ knowledge, all Latent Class Analyses (LCA) conducted so far were based on samples from the general population and conducted LCA with raw scores or mere symptom occurrences.

  • Subthreshold depression

    2007, Psiquiatria Biologica
  • "I Won't Do What You Tell Me!": Elevated mood and the assessment of advice-taking in euthymic bipolar I disorder

    2006, Behaviour Research and Therapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    First, all participants who did not fulfil the SCID diagnostic criteria for their group were excluded: three participants who had received a diagnosis of bipolar disorder did not fulfil DSM-IV-TR criteria for bipolar I disorder according to the SCID and a further two were unable to engage in the SCID interview. Next, all participants with a Beck Depression Inventory Score (BDI; Beck & Steer, 1987; Beck, Ward, Mendelson, Mock, & Erbaugh, 1961) of over 16 were excluded following recommendations in the manual for the BDI and as used in a study by Cox, Enns, and Larsen (2001); it was not acceptable to induce low mood in people with current significant symptoms of depression. Five participants with bipolar disorder were excluded for this reason, but none from the other groups.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text