Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 102, Issue 12, December 1995, Pages 1953-1957
Ophthalmology

Patient Tolerance and Ocular Surface Staining Characteristics of Lissamine Green versus Rose Bengal*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(95)30769-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose: To determine patient tolerance and ocular surface staining characteristics of 1% lissamine green versus 1% rose bengal solutions in patients with dry eye and in those with normal ocular surfaces by comparison of subjective sensation and objective staining scores.

Methods: Twelve patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca and eight subjects with no ocular surface disease recorded their symptoms on a graded scale (0-5) and the duration of symptoms after instillation of one drop of 1% lissamine green and 1% rose bengal on two different occasions in different order. Lissamine green and rose bengal staining patterns were recorded on a graded scale (0-4) by one of the authors.

Results: For patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca mean sensation score with lissamine green (2.42) was significantly lower (P= 0.00006) than with rose bengal (4.58). The duration of symptoms was significantly longer (P= 0.0007) after rose bengal instillation as well. For subjects with no ocular surface disease, mean sensation score with Lissamine green (1.375) was significantly lower (P= 0.01) than with rose bengal (2.5). In this group, duration of symptoms also was significantly longer (P= 0.001) after rose bengal instillation. In both groups, there was no difference in objective staining scores.

Conclusion: Lissamine green is better tolerated than rose bengal by patients and is equally as effective as rose bengal in evaluating the ocular surface in keratoconjunctivitis sicca.

References (35)

  • MS Norn

    Vital staining of cornea and conjunctiva

    Acta Ophthalmol

    (1962)
  • MS Norn

    Specific double vital staining of the cornea and conjunctiva with rose bengal and alcian blue

    Acta Ophthalmol

    (1964)
  • ISIS Norn

    Trypan blue. Vital staining of cornea and conjunctiva

    Acta Ophthalmol

    (1967)
  • MS Norn

    Dead, degenerate, and living cells in conjunctival fluid and mucous thread

    Acta Ophthalmol

    (1969)
  • MS Norn

    Rose bengal vital staining. Staining of cornea and conjunctiva by 10% rose bengal, compared with 1%

    Acta Ophthalmol

    (1970)
  • RPG Feenstra et al.

    What is actually stained by rose bengal?

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1992)
  • MI Roat et al.

    The antiviral effects of rose bengal and fluorescein

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1987)
  • Cited by (89)

    • The effect of time on grading corneal fluorescein and conjunctival lissamine green staining

      2022, Ocular Surface
      Citation Excerpt :

      Vital staining of the ocular surface with fluorescein has been used clinically for over 100 years to assess corneal damage and to diagnose and monitor the progression of dry eye disease (DED) [1–3]. In the past, rose bengal was routinely used to assess conjunctival staining in DED, but it has recently been replaced by lissamine green due to the toxicity [4–6] and discomfort [7–10] produced by rose bengal. Fluorescein and lissamine green are now considered standard dyes for assessing ocular surface health in DED and are frequently used as important endpoints in clinical trials [11,12].

    • Drugs Used in Ophthalmology

      2020, Drug-Induced Ocular Side Effects, Eigtht Edition
    • Advances in Diagnosis and Management of Dry Eye Disease

      2019, Advances in Ophthalmology and Optometry
    • Review and analysis of grading scales for ocular surface staining

      2019, Ocular Surface
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is usually instilled at a concentration of 1% with a drop of 2–25 μl [7,8] and observed with a slit lamp biomicroscope and white light with no barrier filters. Rose bengal can produce immediate discomfort on instillation that is more prolonged when ocular surface staining is evident [30]. The discomfort likely stems from its property as a type II photosensitizer that releases reactive oxygen species with light exposure [31].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Presented as a poster at the American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, San Francisco, Oct/Nov 1994.

    View full text