Elsevier

Heart & Lung

Volume 25, Issue 6, November–December 1996, Pages 483-494
Heart & Lung

Ethical issue
Letting go: Family willingness to forgo life support

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-9563(96)80051-3Get rights and content

Objective:

To describe the process of family decision making about life support in the critical care setting.

Design:

Descriptive, exploratory.

Setting:

A northeastern United States university-affiliated medical intensive care unit.

Sample:

Thirty family members of 16 critically ill patients.

Results:

Letting go or becoming willing to forgo life support involved three interrelated and complex processes: (1) family members sought out, obtained, and tried to understand information about the critical illness; (2) they reviewed the life story of the patient, seeking meaning in the patient's life and the critical illness; and (3) they struggled to maintain family roles and relationships. For most families, interpersonal and intrapsychic work during each process created a reframing of the issues related to the critical illness: (1) they came to believe that they had done all that could be done and were able then to relinquish the goal of recovery for acceptance of a peaceful death; (2) they reviewed the patient's life, finding some meaning and a sense that, given the situation, the patient would not want to continue on life support, and then they moved toward closure; and (3) they were able to bring about (at least within a small group of the closest family members) a sense of doing the “right thing,” and they were able to develop some sense that forgoing life support for the ill relative would not destroy important family relationships. For a few other families this movement toward resolution did not occur, and although family members attempted to deal with the issues of life support, their efforts were fraught with conflict and prolongation of the end-of-life period.

Conclusions:

Little is known about the actual experience of family members as they are involved in life-support decision making. Identification of the needs of family members to work through the decision-making experience cognitively, emotionally, and morally is essential to communicating effectively about the ill relative's condition and to providing understanding and support to families involved in life-support decision making in the critical care setting.

References (37)

  • CoulterMA

    The needs of family members of patients in intensive care units

    Intensive Care Nurs

    (1989)
  • ChartierL et al.

    Families in ICU: their needs and anxiety level

    Intensive Care Nurs

    (1989)
  • BedellSE et al.

    Do-not-resuscitate orders for critically ill patients

    JAMA

    (1986)
  • LeeK et al.

    Withdrawing care

    JAMA

    (1994)
  • SmedriaNG et al.

    Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill

    N Engl J Med

    (1990)
  • La PumaJ et al.

    Clinical analysis of the patient self-determination act of 1990

    JAMA

    (1991)
  • BlusteinJ

    The family in medical decision making

    Hastings Center Rep

    (1993)
  • BuchananA et al.

    Deciding for others: the ethics of surrogate decision making

  • BoumanCC

    Identifying priority needs of families of ill patients

    Dimens Crit Care

    (1984)
  • EngeliM et al.

    Needs of family members of critically ill patients with and without acute brain injury

    J Neurosci Nurs

    (1993)
  • LeskeJS

    Needs of relatives of critically ill patients

    Heart Lung

    (1986)
  • MirrMP

    Factors affecting decisions made by family members of patients with severe head injury

    Heart Lung

    (1991)
  • MoulterNC

    Needs of relatives of critically ill patients: a descriptive study

    Heart Lung

    (1979)
  • NorrisLO et al.

    Investigation of selected psychosocial needs of family members of critically ill adult patients

    Heart Lung

    (1986)
  • RodgersC

    Needs of relatives of cardiac surgery patients during the critical phase

    Focus Crit Care

    (1983)
  • SherizenS et al.

    Dying in a hospital intensive care unit: the social significance for the family of the patient

    Omega

    (1977)
  • AnspachR

    Deciding who lives

  • PinchW et al.

    The parents' perspective: ethical decision making in neonatal intensive care

    J Adv Nurs

    (1990)
  • Cited by (99)

    • Family members' perceptions of surrogate decision-making in the intensive care unit: A systematic review

      2023, International Journal of Nursing Studies
      Citation Excerpt :

      1) End-of-life decisions refer to the process of developing and implementing end-of-life treatment and care plans for terminally ill patients, including whether to initiate, continue, withdraw, or withhold life-sustaining treatment (Wendler and Rid, 2011), such as mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Approximately 19 studies were included within this decision category (Apatira et al., 2008; Dionne-Odom et al., 2015; Hadler et al., 2021; Jacob, 1998; Kryworuchko et al., 2012; Li et al., 2018; Limerick, 2007; Lind et al., 2011; Long et al., 2011; Moss et al., 2019; Nunez et al., 2015; Quinn et al., 2012; Radwany et al., 2009; Schenker et al., 2012a, 2012b; Swigart et al., 1996; Tilden et al., 1995; Xie et al., 2015; Zier et al., 2008; Zier et al., 2012). ( 2) Treatment decisions refer to the process of selecting medical measures, such as medication, indwelling arterial line, dialysis, surgery, or procedural interventions (McKenzie et al., 2015), appropriate for the patient's current condition from proposed treatment options based on a correct diagnosis (Blank et al., 2006).

    • The Science of Context: Transforming Serious Illness Care Though In Situ Observation

      2022, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Responding to his own call-to-action, in 2002, Randy laid out a detailed framework and a rigorous approach to answer these fundamental research questions by studying family conferences using qualitative data collection and analysis.5 At that time, the application of qualitative methods in the ICU by physician-investigators was rare, and fundamental questions remained about the feasibility and acceptability of recording highly sensitive discussions that take place during family conferences.2–4 Randy's successful use of these methods to leverage the key moments for data collection within a complex clinical environment helped establish the viability and necessity of this approach.6-8

    • An Emerging Concept: Peaceful Letting Go

      2015, Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
    • A conceptual model of the role of communication in surrogate decision making for hospitalized adults

      2012, Patient Education and Counseling
      Citation Excerpt :

      One study found higher posttraumatic stress symptoms in ICU family members who participated in decision making than those who did not [36]. Qualitative studies have examined the experience of the surrogate in other settings such as the nursing home [37,38] or ICU [39,40], or have interviewed the family members of veterans [41–43], of patients who died after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments [44,45], and family members who have made a decision about a feeding tube [46,47]. Both these and quantitative, survey based studies [48] have consistently shown that the decision making process was stressful to family members.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funded by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Nursing Research. RO3117-01.

    View full text