Fatigue initiation and propagation in natural and synthetic rubbers
Introduction
It is well known that the specific fatigue strength of long fiber reinforced polymer matrix composites is excellent compared with other materials. Considering short fiber or particulate reinforced polymer composites the characterization of fatigue strength is more difficult. It is not possible to compare the fatigue resistance of rubbers with other composite materials for two reasons: (1) the deformation of elastomeric composites is extremely large in contrast to many polymeric matrices; (2) the chemical composition and the chemical microstructure have a drastic effect on fatigue mechanisms, much more important than for other polymeric matrices.
In fact, rubbers have to be approached as nanocomposites because the first reinforcement of an elastomeric matrix is related to several networks due to sulfur vulcanization and carbon black networks, for example. Many mineral constituents are also involved. A key problem to understand fatigue of rubbers is the transformation from an amorphous to crystalline phase. In another words, an elastomeric matrix is not chemically stable under cyclic loading and the fatigue damage of rubbers is a combination of mechanical damage, chemical damage and thermal damage.
From the mid 20th century, many papers have been published about the fatigue cracking of rubbers—by Rivlin and Thomas in 1953 [1], Lindley in 1972 [2], Lake in 1983 [3], Stevenson in 1973 [4], Gent in 1992 [5], and Kakavas in 1996 [6].
In this paper, the same approach is used for modelling the fatigue behaviour of NR, CR and SBR rubbers. Natural rubber is assumed to be a reference.
However, in order to point out the principal mechanisms, observation of damage is done a three levels: macro, meso and micro scales. The mesoscopic scale is probably the most fruitful way to study damage related to the chemical microstructure. In order to observe the transformation from an amorphous to a crystalline phase, X-ray computed tomography is used. The attenuation of the X-ray intensity reveals the existence of crystallites, but also detects voids, inclusions and local damage.
Fatigue of rubbers is presented in this paper in five sections:
chemical microstructure of rubbers
loading effect
environment effect
thickness effect
complex loading
Section snippets
Chemical structure and crystallization
Natural rubber vulcanized and reinforced by carbon black, at room temperature is amorphous without loading. During elongation, this rubber is supposed to be transformed from amorphous to a crystallite phase. All the mechanical properties, including fatigue strength, are affected by the crystallization even if the transformation concerns a small amount of molecules. The hardness morphous of NR is 50 shore A.
To show this effect, some tests are carried out with axisymmetric hour-glass shape
Environmental effect
When fracture mechanics concepts are applied to fatigue cracking, we have to remember that cyclic damage of rubbers depends not only on the mechanical loading (including frequency and R ratio) but also on temperature and thermal dissipation, and finally on the environment [6], [7]. The oxygen content of air is known to play an important role in the fatigue of rubbers.
A coherent approach is proposed for fatigue cracking of rubbers, considering the main mechanical parameters and the influence of
Thickness and stress state effect
The application of linear fracture mechanics to elasto-plastic materials shows that toughness and fatigue crack resistance are much higher for plane stress conditions, that is to say in thin materials.
This effect is more complicated for rubbers. Reports in the literature [5] state that the fatigue crack growth rate is higher in thin materials such as NR or SBR. It means that there is no plane stress effect in rubbers. Fig. 9 presents the thickness effect in natural rubbers. Between 1 and 3 mm
Complex loading
In order to identify the principal parameters and mechanisms of the fatigue of rubbers under complex loading several typical tests are discussed.
compression–compression fatigue
tension–tension with high hydrostatic pressure
tension–torsion fatigue
compression–torsion fatigue
Conclusion
The study of fatigue crack growth and damage mechanisms in rubbers has led to the following conclusions:
- 1.
Fatigue damage depends on three basic mechanisms: chemical (composition, crystallization), environmental (oxygen) and mechanical (stretching, triaxial stresses).
- 2.
A mean stress in tension improves the fatigue behavior by crystallization of the stretched bonds for exclusively tension cycles. On the other hand, a minimum stress in compression seriously damages the material.
- 3.
Fatigue crack growth of
References (7)
- et al.
Rupture of rubber: I characteristic energy for tearing
J. Polymer Sci.
(1953) Energy for crack growth in model rubber components
J. Strain Anal.
(1972)Prog. Rubber Technol.
(1983)
Cited by (125)
Comparative study on the effect of carbon nanotubes and carbon black on fatigue properties of natural rubber composites
2022, International Journal of FatigueEnhance energy absorption of hollow-cylinder rubber fender using V-notch ring grooves
2022, Ocean EngineeringDamage evolution in polymer due to exposure to high-pressure hydrogen gas
2021, International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyCitation Excerpt :In situ experiments are necessary to study cavitation behavior inside the polymer because cavities disappear once hydrogen is diffused out of the polymer. Several studies have used in situ photography, small-angle X-ray scattering, and X-ray tomography to visualize the cavity expansion during depressurization [23–29]. Yamabe and Nishimura [9] were among the first researchers to investigate cavitation inside the polymer due to pressurization and depressurization of high-pressure hydrogen.
Insights into the cavitation morphology of rubber reinforced with a nano-filler
2023, Scientific ReportsInfluence of carbon black particle size on fatigue life of rubber compound by varying strain and temperature
2023, Journal of Applied Polymer Science