doi:10.1016/S0076-6879(05)99022-8
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Bi-substrate Kinetic Analysis of an E3-Ligase–Dependent Ubiquitylation Reaction
David C. Swinney, Michael J. Rose, Amy Y. Mak, Ina Lee, Liliana Scarafia and Yi-Zheng Xu
Available online 15 December 2005.
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
Abstract
Little is known about the kinetic mechanism of E3 ubiquitin ligases. This work describes basic methodology to investigate the kinetic mechanism of E3 ubiquitin ligases. The method used steady state, bi-substrate kinetic analysis of an E3 ligase–catalyzed monoubiquitylation reaction using ubiquitin-conjugated E2 (E2ub) and a mutant IκBα as substrates to evaluate whether the E3-catalyzed ubiquitin transfer from E2ub to protein substrate was sequential, meaning both substrates bound before products leaving, or ping pong, meaning that ubiquitin-conjugated E2 would bind, transfer ubiquitin to the E3, and debind before binding of protein substrate. The method requires the E3 reaction to be rate limiting and at steady state. This was accomplished through optimization of the conditions to ensure that the E3-dependent transfer of ubiquitin from E2ub to substrate was rate limiting. We observed a sequential bi-substrate E3-dependent ubiquitylation reaction on using E2UBCH7 and IκBαSS32/36EE (IκBαee as substrates and a partially purified Jurkat cell lysate as a source for the E3 ligase activity). The sequential bi-substrate kinetic mechanism is consistent with the formation of a ternary complex among E2UBCH7, IκBαSS32/36EE, and E3 before the transfer of ubiquitin from E2UBCH7 to IκBαSS32/36EE. The described method should be of use to characterize the kinetic mechanism of other E3 ligase–catalyzed ubiquitylation reactions.
Fig. 1. Schematic of BiBi kinetic mechanisms. The term “sequential” is used to denote systems in which all substrates must bind to the enzyme before any product is released. A random system is sequential even though both substrates bind randomly. An ordered system in which one substrate must bind before the other is also sequential, because no product is released before formation of the ternary complex (E3:IκB:E2ub). Ping-pong systems, in which a product is released between substrate additions, are nonsequential.
Fig. 2. Progress curves for IκBαee ubiquitylation with and without preincubation of ubiquitylation enzymes. E1 (3 pmol), E2 (3 μg), and/or E3 (10 μg) were preincubated for 20 min with ATP and 5 μM125I-ubiquitin, and the reaction was then initiated with the substrate IκBαee (5 μM). All preincubation reactions were carried out at 37°. Reactions with no preincubations were initiated with ATP. At the appropriate time, the reactions were stopped with a 25 mM DTT, followed 5 min later with 5.3 M urea, 59 mM iodoacetamide (final) solution, and ubiquitin conjugated IκBαee separated from free ubiquitin with Ni beads as described in “Materials and Methods.”
 |
Fig. 3. Dependence of IκBαee-ubiquitylation on E1 and methylubiquitin. The left panel shows the saturation of IκBαee ubiquitylation with increasing E1 concentration. E1, E2 (2 μg), and E3 (10 μg) were preincubated for 20 min with ATP and methylubiquitin/ubiquitin mixture, and the reaction was initiated with the addition of substrate IκBαee (5 μM). After 60 min, the reaction was stopped with 25 mM DTT followed 5 min later with 5.3 M urea and 59 mM iodoacetamide (final). Ubiquitin-conjugated IκBαee separated from free ubiquitin with Ni beads as described in the “Materials and Methods” section. The final ubiquitin concentration of 4 μM was composed of 200 pmol unlabeled methylubiquitin and 0.075 μCi, 0.0375 pmol labeled 125I-ubiquitin. The right side of the figure shows the effect of titrating methylubiquitin on the IκBαee ubiquitylation activity. Methylubiquitin was added in concentrations from 50 nM to 8 μM (2.5–400 pmol/0.05 ml reaction), and 125I -labeled ubiquitin was held constant (0.075 μCi, 0.0375 pmol per reaction). The specific activity was calculated assuming methylubiquitin and ubiquitin contributed equally to the formation of IκBαee–ubiquitin conjugates.
Fig. 4. Saturation curves for the substrates E2UBCH7 and IκBαee. The left panel shows saturation curves for E2UBCH7 at fixed concentrations of IκBαee and the right panel saturation curves for IκBαee at fixed E2UBCH7 concentrations. E1 (0.5 μg), E2, and E3 (10 μg) were preincubated for 20 min with ATP and methylubiquitin/ubiquitin mixture and the reaction then initiated with the substrate IκBαee. After 60 min, the reaction was stopped with 25 mM DTT followed 5 min later with 5.3 M urea and 59 mM iodoacetamide (final), and the ubiquitin-conjugated IκBαee was separated from free ubiquitin with Ni beads as described in the “Materials and Methods” section. The final ubiquitin concentration of 4 μM was composed of 200 pmol unlabeled methylubiquitin and 0.075 μCi, 0.0375 pmol labeled 125I-ubiquitin.
Fig. 5. Lineweaver–Burk plots of substrate-dependent monoubiquitylation. Replot of the data in Fig. 4.
TABLE I.
Kinetic Parameters for E2UBCH7ub Interactions Dependent on IκBαee

Kinetic constants were determined by fitting to a one-site saturation curve using SigmaPlot software program. Vmax is expressed as pmol/h/0.01 mg E3; parentheses indicate the standard error.
TABLE II.
Kinetic Parameters for IκBαee Interactions Dependent on E2UBCH7ub

Kinetic constants were determined by fitting to a one-site saturation curve using SigmaPlot software program. Vmax is expressed as pmol/h/0.01 mg E3; parentheses indicate the standard error.