Elsevier

Methods in Enzymology

Volume 336, 2001, Pages 152-159
Methods in Enzymology

[15] First stages of biofilm formation: Characterization and quantification of bacterial functions involved in colonization process

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(01)36587-4Get rights and content

Publisher Summary

This chapter discusses the Bacterial colonization of abiotic materials and biofilm formation, having important detrimental consequences in medicine (contamination of catheters, prostheses, indwelling devices, and artificial organs), and in many economic fields. There is therefore, a strong need to design surface coating methods able to interfere with the colonization process in order to prevent, or at least to delay, biofilm development. To reach this objective, increasing attention is being paid to the physiology and genetics of the initial stages of adhesion. Bacterial appendages and adhesins responsible for the linkage of the first pioneering cells to the surface (or the conditioning film) are potential targets for antiadhesion molecules grafted or smeared on the surface. The determination of the mechanisms resulting in the movement of bacteria toward surfaces—the identification of the functions involved in the sensing of the particular microenvironments encountered at interfaces, and the description of the regulatory networks allowing the developmental processes necessary for the structural development of biofilms—would help find nontoxic surface treatments able to lead the microorganisms away from the locations they usually contaminate. This would be particularly important in the field of indwelling medical devices. Any delay in the colonization process could successfully increase the capacities of the antibiotic therapy and the immunological defenses to eradicate the infection. This chapter describes methods to obtain and analyze bacterial mutants with altered adhesion properties.

References (25)

  • GottenbosB. et al.

    Methods Enzymol.

    (1999)
  • CowanM.M. et al.

    J. Microbiol. Methods

    (1987)
  • DorelC. et al.

    FEMS Microbiol. Lett.

    (1999)
  • BosR. et al.

    FEMS Microbiol. Rev.

    (1999)
  • GenevauxP. et al.

    FEMS Microbial. Lett.

    (1999)
  • Prigent-CombaretC. et al.

    Methods Enzymol.

    (1999)
  • T. T. Le Thi, P. Lejeune, unpublished results...
  • JuckerB.A. et al.

    J. Bacteriol.

    (1996)
  • DykhuizenD.E. et al.

    Microbiol. Rev.

    (1983)
  • LarsenD.H. et al.

    J. Bacteriol.

    (1964)
  • MurgelG.A. et al.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (1991)
  • R. Longin, unpublished observation...
  • Cited by (28)

    • Biofilm production: A strategic mechanism for survival of microbes under stress conditions

      2022, Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, as observed in the 3D biofilm complex, bacteria are metabolically present in different conditions, and removals of such biofilms require using high-dose antibiotics or surgery. Another possible risk of building a biofilm is its association with blood flow which may locate it in a new area (Le-Thi et al., 2001). In general, the process of biofilm formation is a highly regulated and evolutionary one.

    • Interaction of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus with Listeria innocua in dual species biofilms and inactivation following disinfectant treatments

      2020, LWT
      Citation Excerpt :

      The microscopic examination was performed with an epifluorescence microscope (Olympus BX51, Olympus) equipped with a 100 W mercury lamp, XC digital camera and a set of filters: U-MNB2: 470–490 nm and U-MNG2: 530–550 nm for detection of green and red fluorescence, respectively. Thirty pictures were taken for each well to evaluate biofilm adhesion characteristics using a 9-stage adherence scale (Le Thi, Prigent-Combaret, Dorel, & Lejeune, 2001) with some modifications (Olszewska et al., 2016). Statistical analysis was conducted with Statistica software ver.

    • Biofilm formation by meat-borne Pseudomonas fluorescens on stainless steel and its resistance to disinfectants

      2018, Food Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      Differences in the experimental design, including incubation conditions, support structures, and evaluation methods, may explain these discrepancies. Nine stages of bacterial adherence have been defined by Thi, Prigent-Combaret, Dorel, and Lejeune (2001). The classification was based on viewing randomly selected fields during epifluorescence microscopy.

    • Inhibition of quorum sensing-related biofilm of Pseudomonas fluorescens KM121 by Thymus vulgare essential oil and its major bioactive compounds

      2016, International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this work, the adhesion analysis was started when the Thymus vulgare oil and its selected phytochemicals switched-off AHLs production and down-regulated the flgA gene expression in the examined cells. To define the rate of the biofilm development process, the 9-degree adhesion scale described by Le Thi et al. (2001) was used. According to the method, when a particular degree of adhesion occurred with a minimum amount of 20%, the degree became the dominant one.

    • Electrokinetic and bioactive properties of CuOSiO<inf>2</inf> oxide composites

      2012, Bioelectrochemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Bacterial attachment to the surface is crucial for the survival and development of bacterial biofilms, which contribute to enhanced biological, chemical and mechanical resistance. In order to assess the anti-adhesive activity of the CuO·SiO2 enriched polymers, the 9-degree scale of adhesion previously proposed by Le Thi et al. [19] was employed. A certain degree became dominant when the adhesion occurred with a minimum of 20%.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text