Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Practices and Pitfalls of Mouse Cancer Models in Drug Discovery
Available online 8 December 2006.
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.
Mouse models of cancer are critical tools for elucidating mechanisms of cancer development, as well as for assessment of putative cancer therapies. However, there are ongoing concerns about the value of mouse cancer models for predicting therapeutic efficacy in humans. This chapter reviews the most commonly used transplanted tumor models, including subcutaneous and orthotopic tumors in mice. It also reviews commonly utilized in vivo study endpoints. Even small improvements in predictive value achieved through careful selection of models and endpoints have the potential to have large impacts on productivity and overall drug development costs.
Article Outline
- I. Why Are Animal Models Needed?
- II. Model Types: Tumor Locations
- A. Subcutaneous Xenograft Models
- B. Hollow Fiber Models
- C. Orthotopic Models
- D. Genetically Defined Tumor Models
- III. Tumor Models: Cell Types
- IV. Study Endpoints
- A. Efficacy Endpoints: Is Tumor Growth Effected?
- B. Functional and Molecular Endpoints: Is the Target Modulated?
- V. Animal Modeling in the Post-genomics Age
- VI. Conclusions
- References







E-mail Article
Add to my Quick Links

Cited By in Scopus (3)




