doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(05)89004-2
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Assessing Soil Fertility Decline in the Tropics Using Soil Chemical Data
ISRIC–World Soil Information, 6700 AJ Wageningen, The Netherlands
Available online 24 May 2006.
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
Soil fertility decline is perceived to be widespread in the upland soils of the tropics, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Most studies have used nutrient balances to assess the degree and extent of nutrient depletion; these have created awareness but suffer methodological problems as several of the nutrient flows and stocks are not measured. This chapter focuses on the assessment of soil fertility decline using soil chemical data (pH, organic C, total N, available P, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and exchangeable cations) that are routinely collected in soil surveys or for the assessment of fertilizer recommendations. Soil fertility decline can be assessed using a set of properties from different periods at the same site or from different land-use systems with the same soils. The former is easier to interpret; the latter can be rapidly collected but differences may be due to inherent differences and not have resulted from soil management. This study provides an analytical framework for the assessment of soil fertility decline and shows pitfalls and how they should be handled. Boundary conditions are presented that could be used in future studies on soil fertility management and crop productivity in the tropics.
Figure 1. Changes in topsoil pH (0–0.15 m) in relation to the initial pH at t1 (A), and the change in topsoil pH with time (B). Based on 80 sample pairs. Type I data. Modified from Hartemink (1998a).
Figure 2. Theoretical changes in soil chemical properties over time when no amendments are made and the soils are permanently cropped: (A) noise and trend, and (B) exponential decline. See text for explanation (Hartemink, 2003).
Table I.
Additions, Removals, Transformations, and Transfer of Nutrients in Soils Under Natural and Agricultural Ecosystems

Table II.
Data Types in Soil Fertility Decline Studies and Their Main Advantages and Disadvantages

Partly after Hartemink (2003).
Table III.
Soil Parameters, Their Variation and Number of Subsamples Required

Modified from Brown 1999 and Landon 1991.
Table IV.
Sample Size Required for Estimation of the pH, Organic C, Total N, and CEC at Different Levels of Error at Two Sites Under Araucaria cunninghamii Plantations in Subtropical Australia

Modified from Prasolova et al. (2000).
Table V.
Field Scale Heterogeneity in pH and Exchangeable K (n = 4) in a 20-Year Old Oil Palm Plantation in Malaysia

Only circles around the palm received N and K fertilizer. Modified from Kee et al. (1995).
Table VI.
Soil Fertility Status Under Sugarcane (Within and Interrow)

Values are the arithmetic mean of five samples ± 1 SD. Modified from Hartemink (1998b).
Table VII.
Nutrient Removal (kg ha−1) by Annual Crops

nd, no data.
Table VIII.
Nutrient Removal (kg ha−1) by Perennial Crops

nd, no data.
Table IX.
Nutrient Uptake (kg ha−1 ± 1 SD) of Sweet Potato at Two Sites in the Humid Lowlands of Papua New Guinea

Hobu soils were classified as Typic Eutropepts and the soils at Unitech were Typic Tropofluvents (Hartemink et al., 2000).
Table X.
Topsoil Chemical Properties of Fluvents and Vertisols Between 1979 and 1996 (Arithmetic Mean ± 1 SD) of a Sugarcane Plantation in Papua New Guinea

nd, no data. Type I data modified from Hartemink (1998c).
Table XI.
Soil Analytical Data of Under Bush Vegetation and Permanent Cropping in Northeast Tanzania

Type II data modified from Hartemink (1997b).
bAluminium saturation of the ECEC is calculated as: (Al/Ca + Mg + K + Na + H + Al) * 100. nd, no data.
a Sampled sites were within 100 m distance.
Table XII.
Decline of Soil Fertility in Relative Values (Percentage per Year) and Calculated k-factor Based on First Order Kinetics

Modified from Arnason et al. (1982).
Table XIII.
Nutrient Concentration and Nutrient Content of Oxisols Under Sugarcane in 1978 and in 1983

Calculated from data in Masilaca et al. (1985).
Table XIV.
Nutrient Concentration and Nutrient Content (0–0.15 m depth) of Alfisols Under Fallow and 10 Years of Cropping

Calculated from data in Aina (1979).
Table XV.
Changes in a Soil Property Between Different Sampling Times (A, B, C, D, etc.)—Based on Fig. 2A
