ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Advances in Agronomy
Volume 89, 2006, Pages 1-72
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (742 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(05)89001-7    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Advances in the Characterization of Phosphorus in Organic Wastes: Environmental and Agronomic Applications

Gurpal S. Toor1, Stefan Hunger2, J. Derek Peak3, J. Thomas Sims4 and Donald L. Sparks4

1Biological & Agricultural Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 2School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom 3Department of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N rA8, Canada 4Department of Plant & Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716

Available online 24 May 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

There is international interest today in the fate and transformation of phosphorus (P) applied to soils due to historical overapplication of P from organic wastes. This overapplication has increased soil solution P concentrations and enriched the erodible fraction of soil with P. This is of major concern as significant water quality deterioration can occur if P applied to soils in organic wastes reaches water bodies. Just as the bioavailability of P compounds depends upon their chemical form, it is becoming increasingly apparent that information about different forms of P is needed for holistic management of organic wastes. A number of chemical and biological methods have been employed to partition total P into more specific chemical forms in organic wastes. However, there has been no previous effort to review and synthesize the literature and to critically analyze the various techniques with promise for chemical speciation of P in organic wastes. In this chapter, we review various types of organic wastes and factors affecting P composition in organic wastes, from production to land disposal. Then, we discuss the various methods that have been used to characterize P forms, including water extractable P (WEP) physicochemical fractionation, sequential chemical fractionation, enzymatic hydrolysis, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and x-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy. To summarize the conclusions, WEP is quick chemical test that should be employed to determine the readily dissolved P in organic wastes and to assess the potential risk of wastes on water quality. The potential bioavailability of P forms in the liquid wastes can be similarly assessed by a rapid and low cost physicochemical fractionation method. Enzymatic hydrolysis and solution state NMR can be of great benefit to characterize organic P species in wastes, whereas solid-state NMR and XANES spectroscopy are better suited to study the inorganic P minerals in the wastes. NMR and XANES methods are both quantitative and can be used to study the influence of management practices on P speciation. Solid-state NMR and XANES methods are capable of performing analysis of heterogeneous material and provides complementary information about P compounds in organic wastes. The combined use of sequential chemical fractionation and spectroscopic methods (NMR, XANES) allows for accurate identification of P compounds in the sequential extracts. Case studies are included throughout the chapter to discuss wider applicability of a particular method. We conclude this chapter by suggesting that more than one method may be necessary for complete determination of P species in organic wastes.

Article Outline

I. Introduction
II. Types of Organic Wastes
A. Agricultural Wastes
1. Dairy and Beef
2. Poultry
3. Swine
B. Municipal Wastes
III. Factors Affecting Phosphorus Composition in Organic Wastes
A. Dietary Effects
1. Poultry and Swine Diets
2. Dairy Diets
B. Organic Wastes Handling Effects
1. Treatments
a. Physical Treatment
b. Chemical Treatment
c. Biological Treatment
2. Storage
IV. Methods for Characterizing Phosphorus in Organic Wastes
A. Total Phosphorus
B. Water Extractable Phosphorus
C. Physicochemical Fractionation
D. Sequential Phosphorus Fractionation
Case Study: Identification of Phosphorus Compounds in Cattle, Broiler, and Swine Manure
E. Enzyme Hydrolysis
F. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
1. Solution State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Case Study: Linking Phosphorus Forms in Dairy Diets with Feces and Manures
2. Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Case Study: Phosphorus Speciation in Unamended and Alum-Amended Poultry Litters
Comparison of Solid State and Solution State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
G. X-Ray Absorption Near Edge Structure Spectroscopy
Case Study 1: Natural and Alum-Amended Poultry Litter
Case Study 2: Correlating Changes in Animal Diets with Changes in Phosphorus Speciation in Poultry Litters and Turkey Manures
Comparison of the Scope and Limitations of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and X-Ray Absorption Near Edge Structure Spectroscopy
V. Summary
Further Reading
References