Some views on the use of expert judgment
References (5)
- et al.
Management Decision Making under Uncertainty
(1969) - et al.
The Mathematical Theory of Communication
(1949)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (8)
A qualitative method proposal to improve environmental impact assessment
2013, Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewCitation Excerpt :The panel selected for this consultation was made up of experts in each of the activities subject to the EIA process. The size of the sample was 20 experts, all of whom had suitable profiles for the application of the Delphi method, as reflected in other similar studies (Amara and Lipinski, 1972). More specifically, the respondents were university professors with either a Master's Degree or a PhD, and who had more than ten years of professional, teaching, and/or research experience.
Assessing the Role of Planning and Considerations in the Sustainability of BRT-PPP Projects: A South African Case
2022, Journal of Construction in Developing CountriesAggregating predictions from experts: A review of statistical methods, experiments, and applications
2021, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational StatisticsPerceived uncertainties of characterization in LCA: a survey
2020, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
- 1
Roy C. Amara is President of the Institute for the Future, Menio Park, California, at which Andrew J. Lipinski is a Senior Research Fellow.
Copyright © 1971 Published by Elsevier Inc.