Supraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: Hand-sewn versus circular staples—a controlled clinical trial
References (33)
- et al.
Restorative surgery of the rectum with a circumferential stapler
Lancet
(1980) - et al.
Pitfalls in use of stapler in gastrointestinal tract surgery
Surg Clin North Am
(1991) - et al.
Prospective controlled study of gastrointestinal stapled anastomoses
Am J Surg
(1980) - et al.
Gastrointestinal stapling at the Massachusetts General Hospital
Surg Clin North Am
(1984) - et al.
Surgeon-related variables and the clinical trial
Lancet
(1978) - et al.
Errors and pitfalls in stapling gastrointestinal tract anastomoses
Surg Clin North Am
(1984) New techniques of gastrointestinal anastomoses with the EEA stapler
Ann Surg
(1979)- et al.
Experience with the Russian model 249 suture gun for anastomosis of the rectum
Surg Gynecol Obstet
(1979) Towards fewer colostomies—the impact of citrcular stapling devices on the surgery of rectal in a district hospital
Br J Surg
(1980)- et al.
A comparison of stapled and sutured anastomosis in colonic operations
Surg Gynecol Obstet
(1982)
Staplers or sutures for colonic anastomosis—a controlled clinical trial
Br J Surg
(1982)
Advantages and disadvantages of mechanical vs manual anastomosis in colorectal surgery. A prospective study
Acta Chir Scand
(1990)
Stapling or suturing for anastomoses of the left side of the large intestine
Surg Gynecol Obstet
(1990)
Suturing or stapling in gastrointestinal surgery: a prospective randomized study
Br J Surg
(1991)
Staples or sutures in the colon? A random controlled trial of three methods of colonic anastomosis
Br J Surg
(1980)
Comparison of stapling and hand-suture for left-sided large bowel anastomosis
Br J Surg
(1986)
Cited by (89)
The design, development, and in vivo performance of intestinal anastomosis ring fabricated by magnesium‑zinc‑strontium alloy
2020, Materials Science and Engineering CRisk of post-procedural bleeding in children on intravenous fish oil
2017, American Journal of SurgeryA novel approach to lower rectal anastomosis: Technique innovation and the preliminary report of twenty cases
2016, Journal of ColoproctologyCitation Excerpt :Colorectal surgeries have drastically evolved during the past few decades. The emergence of Colo- and ileoanal stapled EEA techniques have propelled the development of modern very low rectal anastomosis and reduced the risk of leakage and other complications.7,8 For low anastomosis in general, a higher incidence of urgent defecation, fecal incontinence, evacuation disorders, coupled with frequent bowel movements are expected.9
Safe anastomosis in laparoscopic and robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A narrative review and outcomes study from an expert tertiary center
2015, European Journal of Surgical OncologyAnastomotic technique-Does it make a difference?
2014, Seminars in Colon and Rectal SurgeryAbnormal vital signs are common after bowel resection and do not predict anastomotic leak
2014, Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- *
A.R.C. (Association de Recherche en Chirurgie), and A.U.R.C. (AssociationUniversitaire de Recherche en Chirurgie).
Copyright © 1995 Published by Mosby, Inc.