Elsevier

Surface Science

Volume 539, Issues 1–3, 1 August 2003, Pages 113-119
Surface Science

Growth of nanoscale Ge magic islands on Si(111)-7 × 7 substrate

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6028(03)00753-2Get rights and content

Abstract

We reported a formation of uniform nanoscale Ge islands, which shows rounded shape having a diameter of 3.8 nm, on a Si(1 1 1)-7 × 7 substrate as a template. The rearrangement process of stacking-fault layer in the 7 × 7 reconstructed structure is a rate determinant process, when the growing layer covers the substrate. The lateral growth of Ge island is hindered by the stacking-fault layer and the hindrance restricts the size distribution of Ge islands, so called “magic islands”. We observed the nanoscale Ge magic islands formed at the temperature of 300–360 °C. The some characteristic peaks in the size distribution suggest that the step energy for the Ge islands is smaller than that of Si island. From the temperature dependence of the size distribution, we estimate that the amount of the activation energy of the rearrangement is 2.1 eV. The value is slightly smaller than that for the homo-epitaxial case.

Introduction

In order to construct a building block of nano-structure, we tried to form the uniform nanoscale islands of Ge on the Si(1 1 1)-7 × 7 substrate as a template under various growth conditions (substrate temperature and annealing temperature). And we succeeded in the formation of uniform rounded Ge islands (R-island) with a diameter of 3.8 nm, when the Ge is deposited at 320 °C and annealed at 360 °C [1]. The R-island is composed of 162 atoms and very stable.

The idea of adoption of the Si(1 1 1)-7 × 7 substrate as a template is based on the results in the homo-epitaxial growth on the reconstructed surface [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. The reconstructed structure on the substrate surface has a great influence on the nucleation and growth of growing layer on it. When the surface structure is very stable such as the 7 × 7 structure composed of dimer, adatom and stacking-fault layer (DAS) on the Si(1 1 1) surface [9], the surface structure hinders the lateral growth of epitaxial layer, because the stable surface structure needs a rearrangement to the normal bulk structure when the surface is covered with the epitaxial layer. This hindrance restricts the size of the two-dimensional islands, because the growth unit corresponds to the unit of the 7 × 7 structure at the initial growth stage of Si on the Si(1 1 1) [5], [6], [7], [8]. And the hindrance also influence on the size distribution of Si island after some relaxation processes [3], [4], [5], [6]. Especially, many nanoscale uniform Si islands showing round shape with a 3.8 nm diameter are self-assembled after annealing at 380 °C. Such rounded island has also been observed in the study of epitaxial growth by chemical vapor deposition [10].

Although we have succeeded in the formation of uniform Ge islands showing a rounded shape with a diameter of 3.8 nm [1], we have to obtain more detailed information about the growth of Ge islands to understand the formation mechanism of the nanoscale islands. In this paper, we will show some STM images observed from Ge films grown at various substrate temperatures (Ts) and annealed at same temperature (Ta=Ts) for 10 min, where some “magic islands” are formed. We will discuss the activation energy (Ea) of the rearrangement of the stacking-fault layer in DAS structure, which is a key factor in the formation of the uniform Ge rounded islands, from the size distribution of the Ge islands.

Section snippets

Experimental

The surface of a Si(1 1 1) substrate was heated up to about 1200 °C for a few hours by direct electron current flow in an ultra-high vacuum (UHV) chamber, which leads to a complete degassing of the sample and sample holder. After the treatment, the pressure can be kept 2 × 10−8 Pa or less, when the sample is heated at 1200 °C for a few minutes. We measured the Ts with an infrared radiation thermometer (Ts<800 °C) and an optical pyrometer (Ts>800 °C).

Ge films with thickness about 0.04 bilayer (BL: 1

The size distribution of Ge islands

Fig. 1 shows STM images (60 × 60 nm2) from Ge films deposited at (a) Ts=300 °C, (b) Ts=320 °C, (c) Ts=340 °C and (d) Ts=360 °C. The faulted half (FH) and the unfaulted half (UH) of the 7 × 7 structure on the substrate are indicated by a solid and an open triangle in the lower left corner of Fig. 1(b). At Ts=300 °C, some small triangular (ST) islands, which are surrounded by the FH of the substrate, are formed as indicated by ST. The ST-island covers only one FH and three UH under it. This island

Summary

We observed the nano-islands growth of Ge on the Si(1 1 1)-7 × 7 substrate, and we found out two characteristic features for the Ge islands by comparison with the growth of Si islands on the same surfaces: (1) The population of the star-like islands for the Ge is larger than that for the Si; and (2) the contour of the Ge nano-islands shows irregular line (R-islands) and the effective length of edge becomes long comparing to the R-islands in the Si cases. From these results, we conclude that the εs

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by “Takahashi Industrial and Economic Research Foundation” and “The Grants in Support of the Promotion of Research at Yokohama City University”.

References (11)

  • K. Masuda et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2001)
  • Y. Shigeta et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (1996)
  • K. Takayanagi et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1985)
  • Y. Shigeta et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1995)
  • Y. Shigeta

    Surf. Rev. Lett.

    (1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (19)

  • In situ observation of low temperature growth of Ge on Si(1 1 1) by reflection high energy electron diffraction

    2016, Applied Surface Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    This agrees with our RHEED results showing an intermediate state (see Fig. 3, inset (a)) before the Ge(1 1 1) −5 × 5 surface reconstruction is fully developed at 2.2 ML. During the growth of the Ge wetting layer, the Si(1 1 1) −7 × 7 surface reconstruction is removed and the surface Si atoms rearrange to the Si(1 1 1) −1 × 1 bulk structure [87] prior to formation of Ge(1 1 1) −5 × 5 surface reconstruction. Asaoka et al. [28] measured the surface stress during wetting layer growth of Ge on Si(1 1 1) with the surface curvature method.

  • Ag-induced √3 reconstruction on Si(111)/Ge-(5 × 5) and the surfactant behavior of Ag in further growth of Ge

    2015, Applied Surface Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Strain, not only influences the electronic properties such as carrier density and mobility [2,3], but also offers the possibility to design nanoscale structures [4–8]. Si(111) and Ge(111) surfaces have been extensively investigated [9–18] and are well understood. A compressive strain is introduced in the Ge layer grown on a Si substrate and a tensile strain is introduced in the Si layer grown on a Ge substrate [19–23].

  • The evolution of Si-capped Ge islands on Si (1 0 0) by RF magnetron sputtering and rapid thermal processing: The role of annealing times

    2014, Microelectronic Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    Referring to Table 2, when the sample was first annealed at 900 °C for 30 s, a pronounced Raman peak at 287.61 cm−1 with asymmetrical broadening (FWHM ∼ 23 cm−1) over the low frequency side emerged, indicating an existence of good Ge nanocrystal at this annealing time. The peak was red shifted by ∼12 cm−1 compared to that of the bulk Ge (300 cm−1) [24], which indicates the presence of residual tensile stress around the Ge nanocrystals. [25] considered that the Ge island on the Si substrate causes tensile stress in the Si substrate layer due to the lattice constant of Ge is 4% larger than that of Si.

  • Self-assembled Ge islands and nanocrystals by RF magnetron sputtering and rapid thermal processing: The role of annealing temperature

    2013, Applied Surface Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    It is well-established that tensile and compressive stresses affect the Raman spectrum by a red shift and a blue shift, respectively [26]. The Ge peaks from the as-deposited to 700 °C samples were observed to be red-shifted by 5.93, 5.38, 4.82 and 2.61 cm−1, respectively compared with that of the bulk Ge (300 cm−1) [27], which indicates the presence of tensile strain in the Ge crystal arising from the difference between the lattice constants of the Ge and Si [28]. Liu et al. [29] estimated the fully strained Ge quantum dots on Si to have a peak shift, Δω of 17.4 cm−1.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text