Lipids and Lp(a) Lipoprotein Levels and Coronary Artery Disease in Subjects With Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-6196(12)61638-3Get rights and content

Objective

To determine whether increased Lp(a) lipoprotein levels are associated with either non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) or coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with NIDDM and to examine the relationship between Lp(a) levels and glycemic control.

Design

We conducted a cross-sectional study of subjects with NIDDM who were participants in the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study and healthy control subjects from the population of Rochester, Minnesota.

Material and Methods

Lipids and Lp(a) lipoprotein levels were compared in 227 subjects with NIDDM and 163 control subjects and, among the subjects with NIDDM, in those with (N = 96) and without (N = 131) CAD. The correlation between Lp(a) levels and glycosylated hemoglobin was investigated.

Results

Subjects with NIDDM had higher triglyceride and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels than did control subjects. Subjects with NIDDM and CAD had higher total cholesterol, triglyceride, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels than did subjects with NIDDM without CAD. Subjects with NIDDM had significantly higher Lp(a) levels than did control subjects, but subjects with NIDDM and CAD did not have significantly higher Lp(a) levels than did those without CAD. Among subjects with NIDDM, the level of Lp(a) was not significantly correlated with glycosylated hemoglobin.

Conclusion

Although subjects with NIDDM have higher Lp(a) levels than do control subjects, Lp(a) does not seem to be associated with CAD in subjects with NIDDM. In this study, no association was found between Lp(a) level and glycemic control.

Section snippets

Study Subjects

Blood samples were obtained from 227 subjects (115 women and 112 men) with NIDDM who were participants in the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study and 163 adult control subjects (85 women and 78 men) who were healthy persons from the general population of Rochester, Minnesota, without evidence of CAD on clinical examination and review of the medical history. All subjects were at least 35 years old. The diagnosis of diabetes was based on a fasting blood glucose level of more than 140 mg/dL on at

Lipoprotein Profiles in Subjects With NIDDM Versus Control Subjects

Lipid and Lp(a) lipoprotein profiles for subjects with NIDDM and control subjects are shown in Table 1. In comparison with control subjects, those with NIDDM had higher triglyceride levels (2.47 versus 1.34 mmol/L; P = 0.0001, ANCOVA) and lower HDL cholesterol levels (0.92 versus 1.21 mmol/L; P = 0.0001). Total and LDL cholesterol levels were approximately the same in NIDDM and control groups. Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in subjects with NIDDM than in control subjects without

DISCUSSION

Lp(a) lipoprotein is a risk factor for CAD in subjects without diabetes9, 10, 11 and seems to be related to the severity of CAD as assessed angiographically.10 The role of Lp(a) in atherogenesis in diabetes is unknown. Researchers have postulated that Lp(a) may, in part, explain the increased risk of vascular disease associated with diabetes mellitus that exists after controls have been imposed for conventional risk factors.

The role of Lp(a) in atherogenesis in NIDDM has not been addressed

CONCLUSION

Lp(a) lipoprotein levels are higher in subjects with NIDDM than in control subjects. Lp(a) levels in subjects with NIDDM and CAD, however, do not differ significantly from those without CAD. Furthermore, no significant association exists between Lp(a) levels and glycemic control or nephropathy. These findings do not support the conclusion that Lp(a) excess is independently atherogenic in NIDDM. The possibility exists that Lp(a) has a synergistic role in diabetes-related atherogenesis, but an

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We acknowledge the expert technical assistance of Nina D. Bren, who performed the Lp(a) assays, and the help of Douglas W. Mahoney with statistical analysis.

REFERENCES (34)

  • G Dahlén et al.

    Angina of effort and an extra pre-beta lipoprotein fraction

    Acta Med Scand Suppl

    (1972)
  • W Insull et al.

    Plasma pre-beta lipoprotein sub-fractions in diagnosis of coronary artery disease [abstract]

    Circulation

    (1972)
  • G Dahlén et al.

    Lp(a) lipoprotein/pre-β1-lipoprotein in Swedish middle-aged males and in patients with coronary heart disease

    Clin Genet

    (1975)
  • GH Dahlen et al.

    Association of levels of lipoprotein Lp(a), plasma lipids, and other lipoproteins with coronary artery disease documented by angiography

    Circulation

    (1986)
  • GG Rhoads et al.

    Lp(a) lipoprotein as a risk factor for myocardial infarction

    JAMA

    (1986)
  • DL Eaton et al.

    Partial amino acid sequence of apolipoprotein(a) shows that it is homologous to plasminogen

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (1987)
  • JW McLean et al.

    cDNA sequence of human apolipoprotein(a) is homologous to plasminogen

    Nature

    (1987)
  • Cited by (37)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was supported in part by a grant from the American Diabetes Association, Minnesota Affiliate, and Grant NS 14304 from the National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service. Dr. O'Brien is supported in part by the W. L. Stephenson Fellowship in Clinical Nutrition.

    *

    Current address: University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

    Current address: The Watson Clinic, Lakeland, Florida.

    View full text