Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
Degree of learning and the measurement of forgetting
References (17)
Implications of short-term memory for a general theory of memory
J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav.
(1963)The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material
J. educ. Psychol.
(1960)Effect of stimulus-response meaningfulness on paired-associate learning and retention
J. exp. Psychol.
(1963)The retention of individual items
J. exp. Psychol.
(1961)- et al.
Short-term retention of individual verbal items
J. exp. Psychol.
(1959) Retention as a function of degree of overlearning
Science
(1962)- et al.
Comparing retention of verbal lists after different rates of acquisition
J. gen. Psychol.
(1957) Retention of verbal associates as a function of strength
J. exp. Psychol.
(1957)
Cited by (98)
Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress
2017, Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive ReferenceOntogeny of memory: An update on 40 years of work on infantile amnesia
2016, Behavioural Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :Perhaps memories formed in infancy are not encoded as successfully or completely as later memories. Rate of acquisition is one index of the strength of original learning; the final degree of learning will usually be lower following slower rates of attaining a criterion [67]. However, in a number of experiments it was found that infant rats exhibited higher rates of forgetting compared to adults despite equivalent rates of acquisition and initial memory expression [35,68,69].
Adaptive response-time-based category sequencing in perceptual learning
2014, Vision ResearchRetrieval mode distinguishes the testing effect from the generation effect
2010, Journal of Memory and LanguageEmotion and autobiographical memory
2010, Physics of Life ReviewsCitation Excerpt :A large proportion of memory research has followed the “verbal learning tradition” (e.g., [408,409]), assessing the number of unrelated words that individuals can learn and the period of time over which they can retain the information.
Forgetting
2007, Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference
- 1
The present paper is an outgrowth of many discussions and many analyses over the past 10 years. Involved in these discussions have been E. J. Archer, Jack Richardson, R. W. Schulz, W. N. Runquist, Geoffrey Keppel, and Bruce Ekstrand. The latter two have critically read the manuscript and have contributed to the particular analyses presented.
- 2
This work was supported by Contract Nor-1228 (15), Project NR 154-057, between Northwestern University and the Office of Naval Research.