Original article
Alexithymia and risk of death in middle-aged men

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(96)00226-7Get rights and content

Abstract

We prospectively examined the association between alexithymia and risk of death over an average follow-up time of nearly 5.5 years in 42- to 60-year-old men (N = 2297) participating in the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study (KIHD). Alexithymia, impairment in identification, processing, and verbal expression of inner feelings, was assessed by the validated Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS) In age-adjusted survival analyses, men in the highest alexithymia quintile had a twofold greater risk of all-cause death (p<0.001) and a threefold greater risk of death from accidents, injury, or violence (p<0.02) relative to the men in the three lowest alexithymia quintiles. There was little evidence for confounding by behavioral factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity), physiological risk factors (LDL, HDL, body mass index, hypertension), socioeconomic status, marital status, perceived health, prior diseases and diagnoses, depressive symptoms or social connections. Consistent and even stronger associations between alexithymia and all-cause death were found in a healthy subgroup (N = 1650). Why difficulties in dealing with emotions associate with increased mortality remains unclear. Our findings suggest that the association is independent from the effect of well-known behavioral, biological, and psychosocial risk factors.

References (45)

  • L Abramson et al.

    Alexithymic characteristics and metabolic control in diabetic and healthy adults

    J Nerv Ment Dis

    (1991)
  • AS Papciak et al.

    Alexithymia and pain in an outpatient behavioral medicine clinic

    Int J Psychiatry Med

    (1987)
  • TG Sriram et al.

    Controlled study of alexithymic characteristics in patients with psychogenic pain disorder

    Psychother Psychosom

    (1987)
  • G Legorreta et al.

    Alexithymia and symbolic function in the obese

    Psychother Psychosom

    (1988)
  • GA Fava et al.

    Large bowel disorders. II. Psychopathology and alexithymia

    Psychother Psychosom

    (1977)
  • GM Taylor et al.

    Alexithymic characteristics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

    Can J Psychiatry

    (1981)
  • O Todarello et al.

    Alexithymia and breast cancer: a survey of 200 women undergoing mammography

    Psychother Psychosom

    (1989)
  • O Todarello et al.

    Alexithymia, immunity and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a pilot study

    Psychother Psychosom

    (1994)
  • MP Bourke et al.

    Alexithymia in women with anorexia nervosa

    A preliminary investigation

    Br J Psychiatry

    (1992)
  • DC Jimerson et al.

    Alexithymia ratings in bulimia nervosa: clinical correlates

    Psychosom Med

    (1994)
  • PR Finn et al.

    Alexithymia in males at high genetic risk for alcoholism

    Psychother Psychosom

    (1987)
  • MG Haviland et al.

    Validation of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale with substance abusers

    Psychother Psychosom

    (1988)
  • Cited by (136)

    • Seeing things differently: Gaze shapes neural signal during mentalizing according to emotional awareness

      2021, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      Considering alexithymia as a categorical concept, its prevalence has been reported as approximately 10% in the general population, but may increase up to 60% in clinical samples (Honkalampi et al., 2000; Leweke et al., 2012). High alexithymia often co-occurs with psychiatric, psychosomatic and certain somatic diseases (e.g., Karukivi et al., 2016; Ricciardi et al., 2015; Schauer et al., 2019) and has been related to increased mortality risk (Kauhanen et al., 1996; Tolmunen et al., 2010) and negative treatment outcome (Lumley et al., 2007). Given that accurate judgments about emotions are crucial for successful social interaction (Jack and Schyns, 2015), it is not surprising that people with high alexithymia seem to struggle with understanding their counterpart.

    • Personality and performance: moving beyond the Big 5

      2017, Current Opinion in Psychology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text