A prospective 10-year study of metal ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prosthesis retainers in private practice set tings

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60034-7Get rights and content

Statement of problem

Metal ceramic restorations are widely used in prosthodontics, but long-term data on their clinical performance in private practice settings based on prospective trials are sparse.

Purpose

This clinical trial was designed to provide realistic long-term survival rates for different outcomes related to tooth loss, crown loss, and metal ceramic defect.

Material and methods

Ninety-five participants were provided with 190 noble metal ceramic single crowns and 138 participants with 276 fixed dental prosthesis retainer crowns on vital posterior teeth. Follow-up examinations were scheduled 2 weeks after insertion, annually up to 8 years, and after 10 years. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, Mantel-Cox logrank tests, and Cox regression analyses were conducted.

Results

Because of variations in the time of the last examinations, the maximum observation period was 12.1 years. For the primary outcome ‘loss of crown or tooth’, the Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 94.3% ±1.8% (standard error) at 8.0 years (last outcome event) for single crowns and 94.4% ±1.5% at 11.0 years for fixed dental prosthesis retainer crowns. The difference between the survival functions was not significant (P>.05). For the secondary outcome ‘metal ceramic defect’, the survival rate was 88.8% ±3.2% at 11.0 years for single crowns and 81.7% ±3.5% at 11.0 years for fixed dental prosthesis retainer crowns. In Cox regression models, the only significant covariates for the outcome event ‘metal ceramic defect’ were bruxism in the medical history (single crowns) and signs and symptoms of bruxism (fixed dental prosthesis retainer crowns) with hazard ratios of 3.065 (95% CI 1.063 – 8.832) and 2.554 (95% CI 1.307 – 4.992).

Conclusions

Metal ceramic crowns provided in private practice settings show good longevity. Bruxism appears to indicate a risk for metal ceramic defects.

Section snippets

Material and Methods

The study was designed as a multicenter clinical trial with 10 private practitioners17, 18 and was approved by the responsible research ethics board (TU Dresden, EK 194062009). The inclusion criteria comprised the need for 2 single crowns or 2 retainer crowns as part of an FDP on vital posterior teeth. Removable dental prostheses in the jaw to be treated, allergies against alloy components, oral mucosal diseases, and psychological disorders were predefined exclusion criteria. After the start of

Results

Because of variations in the time of the last examinations, the maximum observation period was 12.1 years in the SC group and 11.1 years in the RC group. At 10 years, 147 of 190 crowns in the SC group and 208 of 276 crowns in the RC group were still at risk relative to the primary outcome, which is in situ. Thus the drop-out rates over the period of the study were 22.6% (SC) and 24.6% (RC). All the remaining prostheses had been in situ between 10 and 12 years. The numbers of participants who

Discussion

The null hypothesis was not rejected. Originally, the study focused on the differences between differently composed alloys.17 The alloy type was, therefore, analyzed as a covariate. The 10-year analysis, however, focused on the survival of the restorations and metal ceramic defects. Although the 7-year results were published, the current analysis provides important new information. The previous paper reported only the SC data, making no comparisons between SCs and RCs, and did not include a

Conclusions

Metal ceramic single crowns and FDP retainers on vital posterior teeth showed good longevity in private practice settings. Technical complications leading to removal were rare events with noble metal ceramic crowns. Bruxism appears to be a risk indicator for metal ceramic defects. Metal ceramic crowns offer a reliable treatment option. Screening for bruxism might be helpful in deciding between metal ceramic and metal restorations.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank general dental practitioners D. Bracke, M. Eltzschig, S. Focke, B. Fuchs, K. Gäbler, M. Günzel, J. Hartmann, C. Hofmann, D. Lode, M. Wunsch for their participation and valuable contributions.

References (25)

  • NH Creugers et al.

    A meta-analysis of durability data on conventional fixed bridges

    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol

    (1994)
  • I Sailer et al.

    A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: Fixed dental prostheses

    Clin Oral Implants Res

    (2007)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Outcome measurements and quality of randomized controlled clinical trials of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and qualitative analysis

      2022, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      The overall numbers of records screened, identified, selected, excluded, and included are presented in a PRISMA flow diagram (Fig. 1). A total of 64 potentially relevant trials from 79 publications (agreement=94.50%; kappa=.867; 95% CI=0.764 to 0.970) were included.15-21,30-101 The outcome measurements identified in RCTs to assess tooth-supported FDPs are shown in Table 1.

    • A retrospective comparison of the survival of vital teeth adjacent to single, bounded edentulous spaces rehabilitated using implant-supported, resin-bonded, and conventional fixed dental prostheses

      2022, Journal of Dentistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Balasubramaniam reported that no occlusal contact on the pontic in lateral excursion yields better survival rates of RBFPD [21]. In addition, parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism) have harmful effects on the survival of prostheses [22,23]. Although occlusal conditions may change over the course of the follow-up period, future studies identifying the initial occlusal factors at the onset of the study would help to clarify this point.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text