A prospective 10-year study of metal ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prosthesis retainers in private practice set tings
Section snippets
Material and Methods
The study was designed as a multicenter clinical trial with 10 private practitioners17, 18 and was approved by the responsible research ethics board (TU Dresden, EK 194062009). The inclusion criteria comprised the need for 2 single crowns or 2 retainer crowns as part of an FDP on vital posterior teeth. Removable dental prostheses in the jaw to be treated, allergies against alloy components, oral mucosal diseases, and psychological disorders were predefined exclusion criteria. After the start of
Results
Because of variations in the time of the last examinations, the maximum observation period was 12.1 years in the SC group and 11.1 years in the RC group. At 10 years, 147 of 190 crowns in the SC group and 208 of 276 crowns in the RC group were still at risk relative to the primary outcome, which is in situ. Thus the drop-out rates over the period of the study were 22.6% (SC) and 24.6% (RC). All the remaining prostheses had been in situ between 10 and 12 years. The numbers of participants who
Discussion
The null hypothesis was not rejected. Originally, the study focused on the differences between differently composed alloys.17 The alloy type was, therefore, analyzed as a covariate. The 10-year analysis, however, focused on the survival of the restorations and metal ceramic defects. Although the 7-year results were published, the current analysis provides important new information. The previous paper reported only the SC data, making no comparisons between SCs and RCs, and did not include a
Conclusions
Metal ceramic single crowns and FDP retainers on vital posterior teeth showed good longevity in private practice settings. Technical complications leading to removal were rare events with noble metal ceramic crowns. Bruxism appears to be a risk indicator for metal ceramic defects. Metal ceramic crowns offer a reliable treatment option. Screening for bruxism might be helpful in deciding between metal ceramic and metal restorations.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank general dental practitioners D. Bracke, M. Eltzschig, S. Focke, B. Fuchs, K. Gäbler, M. Günzel, J. Hartmann, C. Hofmann, D. Lode, M. Wunsch for their participation and valuable contributions.
References (25)
- et al.
Meta-analysis of fixed partial denture survival: prostheses and abutments
J Prosthet Dent
(1998) - et al.
Long-term clinical study of porcelain-fused-to-gold restorations
J Prosthet Dent
(1984) - et al.
A clinical evaluation of all-ceramic bridges placed in patients attending UK general dental practices: three-year results
Dent Mater
(2012) - et al.
Effect of posterior crown margin placement on gingival health
J Prosthet Dent
(2002) - et al.
A clinical evaluation of cobalt-chromium metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures and crowns: A three- to seven-year retrospective study
J Prosthet Dent
(2007) - et al.
Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure
J Prosthet Dent
(2009) - et al.
Bruxism and prosthetic treatment: a critical review
J Prosthodont Res
(2011) - et al.
The association between wear facets, bruxism, and severity of facial pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders
J Prosthet Dent
(2003) - et al.
Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs)
Clin Oral Implants Res
(2007 Jun) - et al.
Long-term survival of complete crowns, fixed dental prostheses, and cantilever fixed dental prostheses with posts and cores on root canal-treated teeth
Int J Prosthodont
(2007)
A meta-analysis of durability data on conventional fixed bridges
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: Fixed dental prostheses
Clin Oral Implants Res
Cited by (46)
Performance of fixed dental prostheses up to 6 years—A massive data analysis
2022, Journal of Prosthetic DentistryUp to 10 years clinical performance of zirconia ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures: A retrospective study
2022, Journal of Prosthetic DentistryOutcome measurements and quality of randomized controlled clinical trials of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and qualitative analysis
2022, Journal of Prosthetic DentistryCitation Excerpt :The overall numbers of records screened, identified, selected, excluded, and included are presented in a PRISMA flow diagram (Fig. 1). A total of 64 potentially relevant trials from 79 publications (agreement=94.50%; kappa=.867; 95% CI=0.764 to 0.970) were included.15-21,30-101 The outcome measurements identified in RCTs to assess tooth-supported FDPs are shown in Table 1.
A retrospective comparison of the survival of vital teeth adjacent to single, bounded edentulous spaces rehabilitated using implant-supported, resin-bonded, and conventional fixed dental prostheses
2022, Journal of DentistryCitation Excerpt :Balasubramaniam reported that no occlusal contact on the pontic in lateral excursion yields better survival rates of RBFPD [21]. In addition, parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism) have harmful effects on the survival of prostheses [22,23]. Although occlusal conditions may change over the course of the follow-up period, future studies identifying the initial occlusal factors at the onset of the study would help to clarify this point.
Six-year survival of single crowns — A massive data analysis
2020, Journal of Dentistry