Elsevier

Journal of Hydrology

Volume 253, Issues 1–4, 15 November 2001, Pages 227-238
Journal of Hydrology

Turbidity-based erosion estimation in a catchment in South Australia

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00475-9Get rights and content

Abstract

An erosion estimation technique was developed in this study based on turbidity and sediment sampling data in a small catchment in South Australia. Several data sets, derived from the time sequence in which the data were collected, were used to develop a number of turbidity and suspended sediment relationships. These relationships were then used to estimate erosion from the catchment. The variability in sediment load estimation using different relationships, and how these relationships impacted on load estimation, were analyzed in detail. The study estimates erosion on a storm basis using detailed sediment sampling and turbidity data. Storm sediment loads were then accumulated to derive annual load, which distinguishes this study from volume based sediment studies. The study found that large storms dominate erosion in the catchment, and erosion rate depends more on peak storm flow than other hydrological variables. A relatively low annual erosion rate from the catchment was found, which is consistent with studies in other Australian catchments. The study found that, to establish a sound relationship between suspended sediment and turbidity for a catchment, it requires extensive data collection of large as well as small storms at short time intervals, a storm-based erosion estimation approach, and a data set that is used for interpolation rather than extrapolation. Erosion estimation based on infrequent, non-storm based or extrapolated data is exposed to potentially large errors, and the results may only be relied upon as a general guide rather than serious estimation of catchment erosion.

Introduction

Turbidity as a measure of the optical properties of water has been widely used for suspended sediment monitoring (Banasik and Walling, 1996, Jansson, 1997, Hodson et al., 1998, Jansson, 1996). The use of a turbidity meter for sediment monitoring generally requires developing a statistically significant relationship between the turbidity and suspended sediment concentration (SSC). This is not always easy as other factors such as water color, particle size, minerals and organics in water can have a significant influence on turbidity, which influences the relationship between turbidity and SSC (Gippel, 1989). Turbidity and SSC relationships are usually site and maybe time specific, and a relationship is normally unique for a particular catchment and within a particular period of time (Gippel, 1989). No theoretical analysis can determine the turbidity variation or distribution under field conditions. Using a turbidity meter can be a convenient and the most time, labour, and financially efficient method for catchment erosion monitoring and estimation. In addition, a turbidity meter can be programmed to monitor whole time series of hydrographs, which provides a cheap, continuous record of data. However, reliable use of a turbidity meter often requires a sound sediment sampling program, which has not been well addressed in previous studies (Gippel, 1989).

Large scattering of data may mean that no significant relationship can be derived from the data (Brabben, 1980). The use of a less than significant turbidity and SSC relationship may lead to misleading estimation of erosion. Some studies present good results but with low sediment concentrations. For example, Finlayson (1985) obtained a good relationship (r2=0.97) with sediment concentration up to 363 mg/l, while Ekern (1977) reported a linear turbidity and sediment relationship below 100 mg/l of sediment concentration, and a highly nonlinear one at greater concentrations in a small catchment in Hawaii. Van Bueren (1984) studied the turbidity and SSC relationship on the Yarra River, Victoria, and obtained a turbidity and SSC relationship with r2=0.71, and mean SSC of 135 mg/l. Gippel (1989) conducted a more comprehensive study of turbidity based erosion estimation in a small forest catchment near Eden, NSW. Although very detailed, the time interval for sampling was relatively large and only a few high concentration data points were observed.

These relatively good erosion estimation results are generally associated with small storm events, low range of sediment concentration, and large time intervals. It is not known whether the relationships still hold true when the sediment concentration extends beyond the data range, particularly on the upper side which can occur frequently considering the range of sediment concentration obtained. The reliability of predictions at high SSC is particularly important as studies have shown that the largest storms generally carry the majority of annual sediment loads in many Australian catchments (Edwards, 1987, Olive and Rieger, 1984, Sun, 1999). A turbidity and SSC relationship based on low or small storm monitoring may result in significant errors. Therefore, there is need to evaluate the possible errors of erosion estimation based on different turbidity and SSC relationships. Ideally, these erosion estimations should adopt a storm-based approach with the aim of sampling over an entire hydrograph and an emphasis on capturing larger storms to reflect Australian catchment erosion situations.

In this study, monitoring equipment was set up to collect sediment samples at short time intervals with the aim of capturing both the large as well as small storms. Separate turbidity and sediment relationships based on data acquired during different monitoring periods as well as relationships built on the total data were developed. These relationships were then used to estimate erosion loads in the catchment. Through this approach we explored the variability of erosion estimation based on different turbidity and sediment relationships.

Section snippets

The setting up of monitoring equipment in the Sauerbier creek catchment

The Sauerbier creek catchment is situated 20 km south of Adelaide, South Australia (Fig. 1). It has an area of 2.87 km2, a high and low elevation of 370 and 180 m, and has three small creeks contributing to the main channel. A weir was constructed to measure and record flow data at the outlet of the catchment. An automatic sampler and a turbidity meter were installed approximately 100 m upslope of the weir site on the main channel. Three pluviometers were installed in or bordering the catchment.

Developing turbidity and sediment relationships

The relationship between turbidity and sediment concentration is often expressed in a linear regression equation such asM=aT+bOr a non-linear equationM=aTbOr expressed as a polynomial functionM=a0+a1T+a2T2+a3T3+⋯+anTnWhere M is the concentration (mg/l), T is the turbidity usually expressed in NTU or in formazine turbidity unit (FTU), with a, b, superscript b, a0an, and n being constants. Exponential and logarithmic equations can also be used in similar ways.

A question which underlines the

Storm sediment estimation

Selected turbidity and SSC relationships developed in Section 3 were used for erosion estimation from the catchment. Most sediment studies use observed flow data to estimate suspended sediment. This study, however, used both observed and predicted flow for sediment load prediction. A storm rainfall runoff model (Sun, 1999) was used to generate the predicted flow hydrograph and then the turbidity and SSC relationships were used to estimate sediment discharges. This approach enables the

Estimating annual sediment load

The above sediment estimation was performed for the storm events with a reasonable amount of sediment sampling data covering whole hydrographs to validate erosion estimation on a storm basis. The results showed that using turbidity and SSC correlation could satisfactorily estimate sediment load on a storm basis, which is a step forward as compared to the traditional rating curve method. Since more storm events were observed by the turbidity meter and scattered sediment sampling which does not

Discussion

One of the major problems in catchment erosion estimation using turbidity observations is assessing the reliability of relationships established. This study compared alternative approaches to building such relationships, and evaluated their impacts on erosion estimation. The relationships were established based on intensive sediment sampling in the studied catchment. The study suggests that a turbidity meter can be used as an effective tool for catchment erosion estimation, but only after it is

Conclusions

The study demonstrated that a turbidity meter, well calibrated with sediment data, can be used effectively for catchment erosion estimation on a storm as well as annual basis. Successful sediment estimation depends very much on the quality of the observed sediment data and the relationship between the turbidity and sediment concentration. Intensive sediment sampling on a variable magnitude of storms covering whole hydrographs need to be monitored for reliable estimation of erosion in a

References (17)

  • B.L. Finlayson

    Field calibration of a recording turbidity meter

    Catena

    (1985)
  • M.B. Jansson

    Estimating a sediment rating curve of the Reventazon river at Palomo using logged mean loads with discharge classes

    J. Hydrol.

    (1996)
  • K. Banasik et al.

    Predicting sedimentgraphs for a small agriculture catchment

    Nordic Hydrol.

    (1996)
  • Brabben, T.E., 1980. Performance and use of turbidity monitors in the Brantas River Basin, East Java, Indonesia. Rep....
  • Edwards, K., 1987. Runoff and soil loss studies in New South Wales. Soil Conservation Service of NSW, and Macquarie...
  • Ekern, P.C., 1977. Turbidity and sediment rating curves for streams on Oahu, Hawaii. Soil Erosion: Prediction and...
  • C.R. Fenn et al.

    An evaluation of the use of suspended sediment rating curves for the prediction of suspended sedimentation in a preglacial stream

    Geografis. Ann.

    (1985)
  • Geary, P.M. 1981. Sediment and solutes in a representative basin. Australian Representative Basins Program Report...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (36)

  • Temporal variation in TiO<inf>2</inf> engineered particle concentrations in the Broad River during dry and wet weathers

    2022, Science of the Total Environment
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, as shown here, this relationship depends on several factors such as antecedent dry periods and is likely to be site specific. It is worth noting that a strong positive relationship was observed between total suspended solid concentration and turbidity in rivers, which varied for a particular catchment and within a particular period (Daphne et al., 2011; Packman et al., 1999; Sun et al., 2001). This variation between turbidity and suspended sediment underpins our observation of the variation between turbidity and TiO2, given that TiO2 is typically associated with suspended solids.

  • Uncertainty in the evaluation of sediment yield from badland areas: Suspended sediment transport estimated in the Araguás catchment (central Spanish Pyrenees)

    2013, Catena
    Citation Excerpt :

    In several studies relatively good estimates of erosion from turbidity measurements at low sediment concentrations have been obtained (Finlayson, 1985; Van Bueren, 1984), but these have generally been associated with small storm events involving a short range of sediment concentrations and long time intervals. Turbidity and SSC relationships based on low sediment concentrations or infrequent storm monitoring may result in significant errors (Sun et al., 2001). In this study, uncertainty in estimates of suspended sediment yield in badland areas associated with limitations in methodologies and probes was analyzed as the main objective.

  • Temporal variations of suspended sediment transport in Oneida Creek watershed, central New York

    2012, Journal of Hydrology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Suspended sediment transport in rivers is profoundly affected by sediment supply, which varies spatially and temporally at the watershed scale and often leads to the hysteresis effect. Thus, an ideal sampling strategy is to capture variations of sediment transport by continuously monitoring turbidity (e.g., Gao et al., 2008; Olive and Rieger, 1988; Sun et al., 2001). Unfortunately, turbidity is significantly affected by sediment size distribution and other uncertainties (Navratil et al., 2010; Pavanelli and Bigi, 2005), which makes it difficult to establish a reliable turbidity-C curve for estimating continuous C in rivers transporting sediment of variable sizes.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text