Elsevier

Injury

Volume 29, Issue 5, June 1998, Pages 353-355
Injury

Paper
Fracture of the distal forearm: epidemiological developments in the period 1971–1995

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(97)00212-XGet rights and content

Abstract

This study describes longterm epidemiological trends of 8361 distal forearm fractures out of 256431 trauma patients (3 per cent) treated in a Dutch university hospital. The mean incidence rate across the whole lifespan was 42 per 10000 inhabitants. The general picture was that the incidence rate decreased from 47 in 1971 to 38 per 10000 in 1995. The highest age-specific incidence rate was found in the age group above 79 years (90 per 10000), followed by the age group of 0–9 years (80 per 10000). The pattern of aetiology did not change: the distribution was accidental fall (62 per cent), sports and leisure (19 per cent) and traffic (14 per cent). The rate of hospital adminission increased from 6 per cent in 1971 to 14 per cent of patients in 1995. It appeared that the longterm increase of hospital admission can largely be attributed to patients younger than 50 years of age. It has been discussed that the rise in operative treatment may be explained by a growing population and a change in surgical policy leading to more indications to operate on distal forearm fractures.

References (5)

  • J.A Falch

    Epidemiology of fracture of the distal forearm in Oslo, Norway

    Acta Orthop Scand

    (1983)
  • U Bengner et al.

    Increasing incidence of forearm fractures

    Acta Orthop Scand

    (1985)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (43)

  • Influence of loading conditions in finite element analysis assessed by HR–pQCT on ex vivo fracture prediction

    2022, Bone
    Citation Excerpt :

    Changing certain numerical parameters (loading conditions, scan length, resolution…) are potential ways to improve finite element modeling and deserves particular attention for the improvement of fracture prediction. Considering that forearm fractures were almost exclusively caused by a fall from a standing height in a forward direction [18–20] and that boundary conditions have a large effect on radius fracture load in continuum finite element models [21,22] loading orientation should be considered as a non-axial impact on the wrist, which differs from the axial compression utilized in HR–pQCT μFE analysis. In this context, the objective of this study is to compare the axial compression currently used with other loading modes to discriminate fractured radius from non-fractured radius obtained in a previous ex vivo experimental study reproducing a forward fall under dynamic loading conditions [23].

  • Epidemiology of extremity fractures in the Netherlands

    2017, Injury
    Citation Excerpt :

    Strengths of this study include the fact that this study gives a unique nationwide overview of all extremity fractures over a longer, continuous time period. This distinguishes this study from the majority of similar epidemiological studies that focus on a specific fracture type [6,7,10,18–20] or describe the incidence within a single hospital [9,21]. Recently published Dutch insurance data on the incidence of distal radius fractures reported a total of 49,615 distal radius fractures in 2012, compared to 34,666 wrist fractures in our study [23].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text