ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Information Processing Letters
Volume 87, Issue 3, 16 August 2003, Pages 139-145
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (111 K)

  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/S0020-0190(03)00264-3    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Inequality of finite behaviors of rational weight finite automata is in R

B. LitowE-mail The Corresponding Author

School of Information Technology, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld. 4811, Australia

Received 3 October 2002; 
revised 28 February 2003. 
Communicated by L. Boasson 
Available online 22 May 2003.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Inequivalence of finite automata accepting finite languages over a non-unary alphabet is NP-complete. However, the inequality of their behaviors does not appear to have been carefully investigated. In the simplest case, the behavior of a finite automaton is the formal series f such that the coefficient f(w) of a word w is the number of distinct accepting computations on w. This notion will be generalized in the paper to finite automata with rational weights. The main result is that inequality of rational weight finite automata with finite behaviors is in R, random polynomial time.

Author Keywords: Rational weight finite automaton behavior; R; P; Formal polynomial; Formal languages; Computational complexity


Information Processing Letters
Volume 87, Issue 3, 16 August 2003, Pages 139-145
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.