ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Computer-Aided Design
Volume 36, Issue 1, January 2004, Pages 37-50
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (379 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
There are no related articles for this article.
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/S0010-4485(03)00067-8    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Geometric mouldability analysis by geometric reasoning and fuzzy decision making

Zhou-Ping Yina, Han Dingb, Han-Xiong LiCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, c and You-Lun Xionga

a School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China b School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China c Department of MEEM, Faculty of Science and Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China

Revised 26 March 2003; 
accepted 28 March 2003. ;
Available online 22 April 2003.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

This paper presents a methodology for mouldability analysis by finding the optimal cavity design scheme (CDS) based on manufacturing and cost considerations using part geometry, where a CDS refers to a combination of the parting direction, parting line (PL), and undercut features (UF). The methodology takes advantage of geometric reasoning and fuzzy evaluation, and consists of two main stages: (1) generating all possible design alternatives, and (2) choosing the best alternative. In the first stage, after recognizing the potential UF from the given part, a spherical arrangement is constructed by partitioning the unit direction sphere using outward normals of the part's surfaces with the property that each cell in this arrangement has a unique combination of PL and UF set. Thus all design alternatives can be identified in O(ml2) time by visiting the cells in a certain order and updating the PL and UF set incrementally, where m and l are the number of the part's convex and overall surfaces, respectively. In the second stage, the fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making model is employed to choose the optimal scheme from the set of design alternatives with respect to a set of criteria related to the number and volume of undercuts, flatness of the PL, draw depth, and draft angle. This model allows designers to describe their preferences on different criteria in imprecise linguistic statements. Finally, the case studies show that the proposed methodology is very effective in finding the optimal CDS for the molded part and the final results conform to human designers' experience.

Author Keywords: Geometric mouldability; Geometric reasoning; Fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making; Design for mouldability; Mold design

CDS
cavity design scheme
CVF
concave feature
CVR
concave region
CXR
convex region
DD
draw depth
DF
draft factor
EUF
external undercut feature
FMADM
fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making
FPL
flatness of the parting line
GMAP
geometric mouldability analysis problem
IPUF
interacting potential undercut feature
IUF
internal undercut feature
MCC
maximal connected component
NDBG
non-directional undercut feature
NEUF
number of external undercut features
NIUF
number of internal undercut features
PD
parting direction
PEUF
potential external undercut feature
PL
parting line
UF
undercut feature
VMap
visibility map
VUF
volume of undercut features

Article Outline

Nomenclature
1. Introduction
2. Related work
3. Overview of the geometric mouldability analysis approach
3.1. Problem formulation
3.2. Evaluation criteria
3.3. Overview of the proposed approach
4. Generation of cavity design scheme by geometric reasoning
4.1. Determining parting lines
4.2. Recognizing undercut features
4.3. Algorithms for generating cavity design schemes
5. Fuzzy evaluation of cavity design schemes
6. Implementation and examples
7. Conclusions and future work
Acknowledgements
References
Vitae














Computer-Aided Design
Volume 36, Issue 1, January 2004, Pages 37-50
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.