Elsevier

Clinical Radiology

Volume 54, Issue 2, February 1999, Pages 107-110
Clinical Radiology

Original paper
Discrimination between fluid, synovium, and cartilage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Contrast enhanced spin echo versus non-contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed gradient echo MR imaging

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(99)91070-XGet rights and content

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare fat-suppressed T1-weighted 3D-Gradient Echo (GE)-images and conventional T1-weighted contrast-enhanced SE images in the assessment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in an attempt to improve discrimination of inflamed synovium, joint fluid, and cartilage.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: 28 knee joints in 20 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were examined with a 3 D-GE-T1 weighted sequence with frequency-selective fat suppression (Flash 3D fat sat) and T1-weighted SE-sequences after intravenous gadolinium-containing contrast agent administration using a 1.5T system. Differentiation of cartilage, synovium, and joint effusion was assessed on both sequences qualitatively by two observers and quantitatively by signal intensity measurements.

RESULTS: Qualititative analysis revealed higher grading rates for cartilage/fluid differentiation with fat-suppressed T1-weighted GE images than contrast enhanced T1-SE images. Quantitative analysis by measurements of contrast-to-noise ratios revealed significantly higher rates for the Flash 3D fat sat with regard to cartilage/fluid discrimination, significantly higher rates for T1-SE post-contrast for cartilage/synovium discrimination, and significantly higher rates for T1-SE post-contrast for synovium/fluid discrimination.

CONCLUSION: 3D-GE-imaging with fat-suppressed T1 weighted sequences allows sufficient differentiation of cartilage and joint fluid in patients with rheumatoid arthritis without application of contrast agents and may assist in monitoring disease progression and response to therapy. The higher contrast to noise ratios of cartilage/synovium and synovium/fluid on T1-SE images following administration of gadolinium-containing contrast agents may improve detection of disease activity.

References (17)

  • J.C. Waterton et al.

    Magnetic resonance methods for measurement of disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    (1993)
  • P.E. Lipsky

    Rheumatoid arthritis

  • J. Beltran et al.

    Rheumatoid arthritis: MR imaging manifestations

    Radiology

    (1987)
  • A. Mundinger et al.

    MRI of knee arthritis in rheumatoid arthritis and spondylarthopathies

    Rheumatol Int

    (1991)
  • L. Poleskie et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging of bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with radiography

    Skeletal Radiology

    (1993)
  • M.F. Reiser et al.

    Gadolinium-DTPA in rheumatoid arthritis and related diseases: first results with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging

    Skeletal Radiol

    (1989)
  • H. König et al.

    Quantitativ evaluierte dynamische Magnetresonanztomographie bei chronischer Polyarthritis des Kniegelenkes

    Fortschritte Röntgenstrahlen

    (1992)
  • H. König et al.

    Rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of hypervascular and fibrous pannus with dynamic MR imaging enhanced with GD-DTPA

    Radiology

    (1990)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text