AnalyticalEvaluation of seven PCR-based assays for the analysis of microchimerism
Section snippets
Introduction the ultimate goal in organ transplantation is to promote the development of immunologic tolerance, so that the need for long-term immunosuppression is reduced or eliminated. although several potent immunosuppressive agents have been developed, their use has led to a number of side effects and complications (1). the identification of strategies for the induction of tolerance in clinical transplantation is, therefore, highly desirable. a variety of procedures, including blood or bone marrow infusions, have been used to induce tolerance to allografts (2). however, the success of these procedures has been limited, and the mechanisms for their mode of action is a subject of much debate (3). it has been proposed that the exchange of migratory leukocytes between the transplanted organ and the recipient (microchimerism) leads to the development of long-term tolerance, and that this may allow for the withdrawal or reduction of immunosuppression (4)
A variety of PCR-based techniques have been used for the detection of donor-type cells or DNA in the peripheral circulation of organ transplant recipients 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. However, the reliable detection and quantitation of minute amounts of donor DNA against a large background of recipient DNA has been difficult. Additionally, there is a need for a battery of well-characterized assays for the detection of donor DNA, because one assay may not be sufficient or informative for a given
Sample preparation
DNA was isolated from peripheral blood samples from laboratory personnel (male and female) using an inorganic procedure (18). The DNA samples were quantitated by agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining, using known concentrations of HinDIII-digested lambda DNA as a standard. The DNA samples were screened using one or more PCR assays to identify informative pairs. DNA mixtures from the informative pairs were then prepared such that the percentage of one DNA ranged from 0 to 10
Analysis of Y chromosome DNA
Using the X-Y homologous primer pair, approximately 1% of male DNA against a background of female DNA was readily detectable by agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining of the PCR product. The detection sensitivity was increased to approximately 0.1% when [32Pα-dCTP] was included in the PCR reaction mixture (data not shown). With the nested PCR assay for the Y chromosome microsatellite marker, and by including radioactive dCTP in the reaction mixture, we were able to readily
Discussion
The hypothesis that the presence of small numbers of donor cells in organ transplant recipients may be associated with immunologic tolerance has led investigators to actively induce microchimerism in transplant recipients by, for example, injection of bone marrow cells of donor origin (2). However, several investigators have failed to detect microchimerism in short-term or long-term recipients of organ transplants 19, 20. This may in part be due to technical difficulties in detecting minute
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the Showalter Trust, University Surgical Associates, and Fujisawa, Inc. (USA).
References (25)
- et al.
Bone marrow augmentation of donor-cell chimerism in kidney, liver, heart, and pancreas islet transplantation
Lancet
(1994) - et al.
Microchimerism and graft tolerancecause or effect?
Lancet
(1997) - et al.
Evaluation of mixed chimerism by in vitro amplification of dinucleotide repeat sequences using the polymerase chain reaction
Blood
(1991) - et al.
Donor-specific bone-marrow infusion after orthotopic liver transplantation
Lancet
(1994) - et al.
Peripheral microchimerism in long-term cadaveric-kidney allograft recipients
Lancet
(1994) Posttransplant diabetes mallitus—a review
Transplantation
(1994)- et al.
Cell migration and chimerism after whole organ transplantationthe basis of graft acceptance
Hepatology
(1993) - et al.
The role of cell migration and microchimerism in the induction of tolerance after solid organ transplantation
Postgrad Med J
(1997) - et al.
Identification of donor-derived cells in organ transplants by in vitro amplification of Y-chromosome gene using polymerase chain reaction
Cell Transplant
(1994) - et al.
Peripheral blood chimerism in renal allograft recipients transfused with donor bone marrow
Transplantation
(1994)
Microchimerism linked to cytotoxic T lymphocyte functional unresponsiveness (clonal anergy) in a tolerant renal transplant patient
Transplantation
Organ-specific patterns of donor antigen-specific hyporeactivity and peripheral blood allogeneic microchimerism in lung, kidney, and liver transplant recipients
Transplantation
Cited by (19)
Microchimerism in Peripheral Blood and Urine in Renal Transplant Recipients: Preliminary Results
2008, Transplantation ProceedingsMicrochimerism Evaluation in Recipients of Living-Related or Unrelated Deceased Allograft Renal Transplants
2006, Transplantation ProceedingsCitation Excerpt :We may hypothesize that kidney-resident stem cells did not survive owing to inadequate temperature storage or time-related apoptosis caused by the long ischemia time (from 23–40 hours). Another explanation may be related to the possibility that microchimerism was underestimated due to microchimerism waves, that is, detected in the nadir of the curve.10 Further larger studies evaluating two or more consecutive samples may be required to provide an answer to these hypotheses.
Short tandem repeat (STRs) and sex specific Amelogenin analysis of blood samples from neurosurgical female transfused patients
2005, Journal of Clinical Forensic MedicineQuantitative polymerase chain reaction-based assay with fluorogenic Y-chromosome specific probes to measure bone marrow chimerism in mice
2002, Journal of Immunological MethodsSurvival of transfused donor white blood cells in HIV-infected recipients
2001, BloodCitation Excerpt :Regardless of the assay used, the detection of rare populations of cells in blood remains challenging. Assays range in sensitivity from 0.1% male DNA in a female DNA background using single primer pairs for the Y chromosome to 0.0001% with nested primers.35 Different primers may lead to different amplification efficiencies, and inadvertent mispriming of associated material, such as pseudogenes in the recipient, has led to false-positive results because of misinterpretation of the bands as of donor origin.36
Fetal microchimerism in primary biliary cirrhosis
2000, Journal of Hepatology