Elsevier

Clinical Biochemistry

Volume 31, Issue 8, November 1998, Pages 641-645
Clinical Biochemistry

Analytical
Evaluation of seven PCR-based assays for the analysis of microchimerism

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9120(98)00059-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: The presence of small numbers of cells of donor origin in the circulation of recipients of organ transplants (microchimerism) may correlate with immunologic tolerance. As part of our ongoing studies on microchimerism, we evaluated the utility of seven PCR-based assays for the detection of the less abundant DNA in paired mixtures (100 ng total DNA).

Design and methods: DNA samples were screened to identify pairs informative for one or more PCR assays. DNA mixtures from the informative pairs were then analyzed using at least one assay. The assays were based on the X-Y homologous region; a Y chromosome microsatellite locus; three autosomal microsatellite loci; the D1S80 minisatellite locus; and sequence specific oligonucleotide probe (SSOP) analysis of the HLA DRB1 locus.

Results: About 0.1% of male DNA against a background of female DNA was detectable using primers for the X-Y homologous region, but the sensitivity was increased to 0.0001% using nested primers for the Y chromosome microsatellite marker. Analysis of the minor DNA component was difficult with the three autosomal microsatellite assays because of the presence of shadow bands. Similar problems with the D1S80 assay were resolved using more stringent PCR conditions, and the sensitivity was 0.1%. Using the DRB1 locus, we were able to detect 1% DNA in the mixed samples.

Conclusions: These studies show that: (a) nested PCR for the Y chromosome is the most sensitive assay for the detection of microchimerism; (b) D1S80 is a useful marker for microchimerism; (c) additional optimization of analytical conditions is required if autosomal microsatellite markers and the SSOP assay are to be used for microchimerism analysis.

Section snippets

Introduction the ultimate goal in organ transplantation is to promote the development of immunologic tolerance, so that the need for long-term immunosuppression is reduced or eliminated. although several potent immunosuppressive agents have been developed, their use has led to a number of side effects and complications (1). the identification of strategies for the induction of tolerance in clinical transplantation is, therefore, highly desirable. a variety of procedures, including blood or bone marrow infusions, have been used to induce tolerance to allografts (2). however, the success of these procedures has been limited, and the mechanisms for their mode of action is a subject of much debate (3). it has been proposed that the exchange of migratory leukocytes between the transplanted organ and the recipient (microchimerism) leads to the development of long-term tolerance, and that this may allow for the withdrawal or reduction of immunosuppression (4)

A variety of PCR-based techniques have been used for the detection of donor-type cells or DNA in the peripheral circulation of organ transplant recipients 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. However, the reliable detection and quantitation of minute amounts of donor DNA against a large background of recipient DNA has been difficult. Additionally, there is a need for a battery of well-characterized assays for the detection of donor DNA, because one assay may not be sufficient or informative for a given

Sample preparation

DNA was isolated from peripheral blood samples from laboratory personnel (male and female) using an inorganic procedure (18). The DNA samples were quantitated by agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining, using known concentrations of HinDIII-digested lambda DNA as a standard. The DNA samples were screened using one or more PCR assays to identify informative pairs. DNA mixtures from the informative pairs were then prepared such that the percentage of one DNA ranged from 0 to 10

Analysis of Y chromosome DNA

Using the X-Y homologous primer pair, approximately 1% of male DNA against a background of female DNA was readily detectable by agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining of the PCR product. The detection sensitivity was increased to approximately 0.1% when [32Pα-dCTP] was included in the PCR reaction mixture (data not shown). With the nested PCR assay for the Y chromosome microsatellite marker, and by including radioactive dCTP in the reaction mixture, we were able to readily

Discussion

The hypothesis that the presence of small numbers of donor cells in organ transplant recipients may be associated with immunologic tolerance has led investigators to actively induce microchimerism in transplant recipients by, for example, injection of bone marrow cells of donor origin (2). However, several investigators have failed to detect microchimerism in short-term or long-term recipients of organ transplants 19, 20. This may in part be due to technical difficulties in detecting minute

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Showalter Trust, University Surgical Associates, and Fujisawa, Inc. (USA).

References (25)

  • W.J. Burlingham et al.

    Microchimerism linked to cytotoxic T lymphocyte functional unresponsiveness (clonal anergy) in a tolerant renal transplant patient

    Transplantation

    (1995)
  • N.L. Reinsmoen et al.

    Organ-specific patterns of donor antigen-specific hyporeactivity and peripheral blood allogeneic microchimerism in lung, kidney, and liver transplant recipients

    Transplantation

    (1995)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Microchimerism Evaluation in Recipients of Living-Related or Unrelated Deceased Allograft Renal Transplants

      2006, Transplantation Proceedings
      Citation Excerpt :

      We may hypothesize that kidney-resident stem cells did not survive owing to inadequate temperature storage or time-related apoptosis caused by the long ischemia time (from 23–40 hours). Another explanation may be related to the possibility that microchimerism was underestimated due to microchimerism waves, that is, detected in the nadir of the curve.10 Further larger studies evaluating two or more consecutive samples may be required to provide an answer to these hypotheses.

    • Survival of transfused donor white blood cells in HIV-infected recipients

      2001, Blood
      Citation Excerpt :

      Regardless of the assay used, the detection of rare populations of cells in blood remains challenging. Assays range in sensitivity from 0.1% male DNA in a female DNA background using single primer pairs for the Y chromosome to 0.0001% with nested primers.35 Different primers may lead to different amplification efficiencies, and inadvertent mispriming of associated material, such as pseudogenes in the recipient, has led to false-positive results because of misinterpretation of the bands as of donor origin.36

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text