Elsevier

Biological Conservation

Volume 82, Issue 3, December 1997, Pages 369-377
Biological Conservation

Sample shape, spatial scale and species counts: Implications for reserve design

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00042-6Get rights and content

Abstract

The optimal design of nature reserves has been a hotly debated topic for some years. One contentious issue has concerned the ideal shape of reserves, with several researchers suggesting that reserves should be as nearly circular as possible to minimize edge-related degredation and potential ‘peninsularity’ effects. This paper demonstrates an advantage to non-circular reserves: given the spatial autocorrelation of environmental conditions and species ranges, elongated samples should tend to capture a greater diversity of conditions and, consequently, a greater number of species. To test this idea, samples of 16 cells, arranged as 4 × 4 squares, 2 × 8 rectangles and 1 × 16 lines were considered in mapped plant distributions at spatial scales ranging from cells of 1 m2 to 2500 km2. Overall, elongated samples tended to capture significantly larger numbers of species than did their square counterparts, as predicted. The degree of elongated sample advantage was very similar at all but the smallest of the scales considered, suggesting that the pattern of species turnover (β-diversity) is nearly scale-independent or fractal in nature. As the advantages of elongation are largely scale-independent and the only documented disadvantages (edge effects) are very scale-dependent, the optimal shape of a reserve for species sampling should shift as a function of reserve size, with large reserves becoming increasingly elongated.

References (68)

  • J.C.Z. Woinarski et al.

    Application of a taxon priority system for conservation planning by selecting areas which are most distinct from environments already reserved

    Biol. Conserv.

    (1996)
  • M.I. Avery et al.

    Predation on artificial nests adjacent to forestry plantations in northern Scotland

    Oikos

    (1989)
  • G. Bell et al.

    The spatial structure of the physical environment

    Oecologia

    (1993)
  • M.S. Blouin et al.

    Is there a best shape for nature reserves?

    Biol. Conserv.

    (1985)
  • T.S. Brothers et al.

    Forest fragmentation and alien plant invasion of central Indiana old-growth forests

    Conserv. Biol.

    (1992)
  • P.A. Burrough

    Spatial aspects of ecological data

  • S.D. Busack et al.

    Is the peninsular effect a red herring?

    Am. Nat.

    (1984)
  • E. Crackles

    Flora of the East Riding of Yorkshire

    (1990)
  • P.J. Darlington

    Zoogeography: The Geographical Distribution of Animals

    (1957)
  • J.M. Diamond

    The design of a nature reserve system for Indonesian New Guinea

  • J.M. Diamond et al.

    Island biogeography and the design of nature reserves

  • J.G. Dony

    Flora of Hertfordshire

    (1967)
  • J. Foster et al.

    Protected areas in the United Kingdom: an approach to the selection, establishment and management of natural and scenic protected areas in a densely populated country with limited choices

  • S. Fraver

    Vegetation responses along edge-to-interior gradients in the mixed hardwood forests of the Roanoke River basin, North Carolina

    Conserv. Biol.

    (1994)
  • M. Game

    Best shape for nature reserves

    Nature

    (1980)
  • G.G. Graham

    The Flora and Vegetation of County Durham

    (1988)
  • P.C. Hall

    Sussex Plant Atlas

    (1980)
  • H.M. Hastings et al.

    Fractals: A User's Guide for the Natural Sciences

    (1993)
  • A.J. Higgs

    Island biogeography theory and nature reserve design

    J. Biogeogr.

    (1981)
  • B. Hopkins

    The species-area relations of plant communities

    J. Ecol.

    (1955)
  • J.K. Horne et al.

    Spatial variance in ecology

    Oikos

    (1995)
  • R.B. Ivimey-Cook

    Atlas of the Devon Flora

    (1984)
  • Cited by (71)

    • The importance of plot size and the number of sampling seasons on capturing macrofungal species richness

      2018, Fungal Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although our study did not have the goal of determining the effect of plot shape, previous studies have reported that the relationship between plot shape and the measurement of species diversity (Myers and Chapman, 1953; Kunin, 1997; Keeley and Fotheringham, 2005), using square (Pradhan et al., 2013), rectangular (O'Hanlon and Harrington, 2012b) and circular plots (Smith et al., 2002) in macrofungal sampling design. For example, Kunin (1997) found that species number in elongated plots is significantly more than that in square plots, however, Keeley and Fotheringham (2005) didn't find the evidence that plot shape affected on species richness. Nevertheless, square and rectangular plots have been the dominant choice (Smith et al., 2002; O'Hanlon and Harrington, 2012b).

    • Shape matters in sampling plant diversity: Evidence from the field

      2015, Ecological Complexity
      Citation Excerpt :

      Species richness is expected to increase with a decrease in the degree of compactness or adjacency of sampling units (from squares to long, elongated plots), due to expected increases in the probability to include a larger number of habitats and/or a higher heterogeneity in the environmental conditions (Kunin, 1997; Dengler, 2008, 2009; Bacaro and Ricotta, 2007; Stohlgren, 2007; Rocchini et al., 2009; Chiarucci et al., 2009). In particular, species richness tends to decrease with increasing compactness (Kunin, 1997; Stohlgren, 2007; Dengler, 2008, 2009) or with increasing dispersal limitation, as suggested by Hubbell's (2001) neutral theory. However, a capacity to encompass more environmental variability likely depends upon the orientation of the long side of rectangles or elongated plots in relation to the direction on one or more environmental gradients.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text