Biofeedback and a cognitive behavioral approach to treatment of myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome*
References (26)
- et al.
A treatment of temporomandibular joint syndrome with biofeedback training
Journal of the American Dental Association
(1975) - et al.
An analysis of biofeedback training effects for tension headache patients
Behavior Therapy
(1977) - et al.
Management of myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome of the temporomandibular joint by tension control training
Psychosomatics
(1971) - et al.
Behavioral consequences of adaptation to controllable and uncontrollable noise
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
(1971) - et al.
Personality correlates of patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
(1973) Psychological aspects of temporomandibular joint dysfunction
Journal of the American Dental Association
(1969)- et al.
Chronic MPD, group therapy and psychodynamics
Journal of the American Dental Association
(1975) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Psychological Review
(1977)- et al.
An electromyographic feedback technique for teaching voluntary relaxation of biofeedback training
Journal of Dental Research
(1973) - et al.
Biofeedback in the treatment of long-term temporomandibular joint pain
Biofeedback and Self-regulation
(1977)
Perceived control, self-observation and response to aversive stimulation
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Skills training as an approach to the treatment of heterosexual-social anxiety: A review
Psychological Bulletin
Guide to rational living
Cited by (63)
Home Exercise Program for the Temporomandibular Patients
2016, Pathology and Intervention in Musculoskeletal RehabilitationAttentional focus of feedback and instructions in the treatment ofmusculoskeletal dysfunction: A systematic review
2013, Manual TherapyCitation Excerpt :In order to describe all studies comparing different attentional foci, studies were included that did not have a comparison of AF conditions as their stated aim, but included at least one intervention that clearly induced participants to focus their attention internally or externally. While confounding factors made it impossible to differentiate AF effects from the effects of feedback versus no feedback in these studies (Budzynski et al., 1973; Stenn et al., 1979; Yip and Ng, 2006; Thiengwittaporn et al., 2009), they demonstrate how AF is inherent to many common clinical scenarios and provide a template which can be refined by future researchers to enable the isolation of AF effects. The duration of symptoms was not reported by the majority of authors (Alexander et al., 1978; Stenn et al., 1979; Yip et al., 2006; Laufer et al., 2007; Thiengwittaporn et al., 2009), however, the stage of dysfunction may have a major bearing on patients' motor control.
Orofacial pain
2003, Handbook of Pain Management: A Clinical Companion to Textbook of PainA review of complementary and alternative medicine use for treating chronic facial pain
2002, Journal of the American Dental AssociationCitation Excerpt :They found that biofeedback was associated with significantly greater reduction in pain compared with splint therapy or no therapy. Of the four comparative trials28,29,32,40 Crider and Glaros37 identified, three met our inclusion criteria. Dahlstrom and Carlsson28 compared the long-term treatment effects of EMG biofeedback training to effects of occlusal splint therapy in a sample of 30 female patients.
Pain site and impairment in individuals with amputation pain
2002, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationCitation Excerpt :The end points for these measures were adapted from the pain intensity items of the Chronic Pain Grade.15 Numeric rating scales have shown significant correlations with other measures of pain intensity16-20 as well as sensitivity to treatments that impact pain intensity.21-24 To assess impairment associated with pain, participants were asked to complete a modified version of the Pain Interference Scale of the Brief Pain Inventory25 (BPI).
- *
This research was partially supported by a grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health (1365-H08) to R. I. Brooke and P. G. Stenn and by a Medical Research Council General support grant to R. I. Brooke. A portion of this paper was presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, MA, 1977.