Elsevier

Behavior Therapy

Volume 10, Issue 1, January 1979, Pages 29-36
Behavior Therapy

Biofeedback and a cognitive behavioral approach to treatment of myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(79)80006-4Get rights and content

Thirteen subjects suffering from long-standing myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome (MPDS) were selected from a large group of myofascial pain patients attending a pain clinic. MPDS subjective and objective measures were recorded prior to and following a treatment program. This program included relaxation training, sensory awareness training, and coping skills training. In addition, half the subjects were given masseter muscle EMG biofeedback during relaxation training, while, for the others, masseter muscle tension was recorded, but not fed back. All subjects manifested reductions both in masseter muscle tension and in subjective measures of pain. Although the subjects receiving biofeedback experienced less subjective pain, there were no noticeable differences on EMG measures.

References (26)

  • CorahN.L. et al.

    Perceived control, self-observation and response to aversive stimulation

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1970)
  • CurranJ.P.

    Skills training as an approach to the treatment of heterosexual-social anxiety: A review

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1977)
  • EllisA. et al.

    Guide to rational living

    (1968)
  • Cited by (63)

    • Home Exercise Program for the Temporomandibular Patients

      2016, Pathology and Intervention in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
    • Attentional focus of feedback and instructions in the treatment ofmusculoskeletal dysfunction: A systematic review

      2013, Manual Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      In order to describe all studies comparing different attentional foci, studies were included that did not have a comparison of AF conditions as their stated aim, but included at least one intervention that clearly induced participants to focus their attention internally or externally. While confounding factors made it impossible to differentiate AF effects from the effects of feedback versus no feedback in these studies (Budzynski et al., 1973; Stenn et al., 1979; Yip and Ng, 2006; Thiengwittaporn et al., 2009), they demonstrate how AF is inherent to many common clinical scenarios and provide a template which can be refined by future researchers to enable the isolation of AF effects. The duration of symptoms was not reported by the majority of authors (Alexander et al., 1978; Stenn et al., 1979; Yip et al., 2006; Laufer et al., 2007; Thiengwittaporn et al., 2009), however, the stage of dysfunction may have a major bearing on patients' motor control.

    • Orofacial pain

      2003, Handbook of Pain Management: A Clinical Companion to Textbook of Pain
    • A review of complementary and alternative medicine use for treating chronic facial pain

      2002, Journal of the American Dental Association
      Citation Excerpt :

      They found that biofeedback was associated with significantly greater reduction in pain compared with splint therapy or no therapy. Of the four comparative trials28,29,32,40 Crider and Glaros37 identified, three met our inclusion criteria. Dahlstrom and Carlsson28 compared the long-term treatment effects of EMG biofeedback training to effects of occlusal splint therapy in a sample of 30 female patients.

    • Pain site and impairment in individuals with amputation pain

      2002, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Citation Excerpt :

      The end points for these measures were adapted from the pain intensity items of the Chronic Pain Grade.15 Numeric rating scales have shown significant correlations with other measures of pain intensity16-20 as well as sensitivity to treatments that impact pain intensity.21-24 To assess impairment associated with pain, participants were asked to complete a modified version of the Pain Interference Scale of the Brief Pain Inventory25 (BPI).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    This research was partially supported by a grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health (1365-H08) to R. I. Brooke and P. G. Stenn and by a Medical Research Council General support grant to R. I. Brooke. A portion of this paper was presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, MA, 1977.

    View full text