Elsevier

Acta Psychologica

Volume 95, Issue 2, February 1997, Pages 181-193
Acta Psychologica

Subjective vertical and postural activity

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(96)00015-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to test the effect of postural information, resulting from the active control of balance, on the perception of the vertical. Subjects were required to adjust a luminous rod in two different visual contexts: in the dark or within a tilted visual frame. In these experiments, postural activity was manipulated by placing observers either in a situation of slight postural imbalance (Experiment 1) or in a situation of postural immobilization (Experiment 2). In both situations performance was compared with a control condition in which subjects were standing upright freely (Experiment 1) or sitting unconstrained (Experiment 2). Results showed no main effect of active posture or of immobilization on the visual perception of the vertical. In the third experiment, subjects were supine with their Z body axis perpendicular to the plane of the luminous rod. Thus, body orientation relative to gravity was modified and motor activity reduced. In this position, the physical vertical was perceived quite accurately in a dark environment. Moreover, in the tilted frame condition, the supine body position clearly improved vertical judgments. These results are discussed in relation to the ecological theory of orientation (Stoffregen and Riccio, 1988).

References (30)

  • B. Amblard et al.

    Lateral orientation and stabilization of human stance: Static versus dynamic cues

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1985)
  • H. Aubert

    Eine scheinbare bedeutende Drehung von Objekten bei Neigung des Kopfes nach rechts oder links

    A seemingly significant object rotation by leaning the body to the right or to the left

    Virkows Archivs

    (1861)
  • M. Bauermeister

    Effect of body tilt on apparent verticality, apparent body position and their relation

    Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1964)
  • J.L. Brown

    Orientation to the vertical during water immersion

    Aerospace Medicine

    (1961)
  • J. Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1977)
  • D. Corroyer et al.

    Sur l'importance des effets et ses indicateurs dans l'analyse statistique des données

    L'Année Psychologique

    (1994)
  • I.S. Curthoys et al.

    A balanced view of otolithic function

    Psychological Review

    (1990)
  • S.M. Ebenholtz et al.

    Absence of depth processing in the rod and frame effect

    Perception and Psychophysics

    (1982)
  • E.J. Gibson

    The ecological approach to visual perception

    (1979)
  • V.S. Gurfinkel et al.

    Perceptual and automatic aspects of the postural body scheme

  • C.W. Harris

    Beware of the straight-ahead shifts, a nonperceptual change in experiments on adaptation to displaced vision

    Perception

    (1974)
  • I.P. Howard

    Human visual orientation

    (1982)
  • C.W. Mann

    Visual factors in the perception of verticality

    Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1952)
  • J. Massion

    Postural control system

    Current Opinion in Neurobiology

    (1994)
  • H. Mittelstaedt

    A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical

    Naturwissenschaften

    (1983)
  • Cited by (52)

    • In the presence of others: Self-location, balance control and vestibular processing

      2015, Neurophysiologie Clinique
      Citation Excerpt :

      Previous investigations showed that visual-field-dependent participants rely mostly on an allocentric frame of reference [80] and their posture is on average more unstable than that of visual-field-independent participants [36,52]. By contrast, there were more visual-field-independent participants in the ascending group, a population known to be less sensitive to visual references and to have better balance control [80,52]. Overall, these data indicate that visuo-vestibular perceptual styles, already shown for the judgment of line orientation [52,130,72], the interpretation of visual optic flow [73], and the identification of which way is up/down in a visual environment presented in various orientations [48], are also important for interpreting self-orientation and the direction of the first-person perspective.

    • Balance

      2013, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
    • Spatiotemporal dynamics of visual vertical judgments: Early and late brain mechanisms as revealed by high-density electrical neuroimaging

      2011, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      The laterality revealed in the present study has therefore to be related to brain mechanisms underlying VV judgments. Behavioral analysis revealed that the perceived VV was significantly deviated towards the tilted visual references, indicating that participants relied on available external, allocentric, references to perform vertical judgments (Bray et al., 2004; Isableu et al., 1997; Lopez et al., 2006; Luyat et al., 1997; Marendaz, 1998). However, the EP mapping did not reveal any significant EP map reflecting the influence of the visual reference on behavior.

    • Analysis of dynamic sitting balance on the independence of gait in hemiparetic patients

      2009, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      Luyat et al. reported on behavioral vertical as follows. Behavioral vertical is a measure to evaluate how the body is aligned along the gravitational force [10]. It is important in controlling balance in dynamic postures.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text