Elsevier

Vitamins & Hormones

Volume 88, 2012, Pages 507-522
Vitamins & Hormones

Chapter twenty-three - Hedgehog Inhibition as an Anti-Cancer Strategy

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394622-5.00023-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Dysregulated Hedgehog (Hh) signaling has been implicated in a growing number of human cancers. Although first identified as an important developmental signaling pathway crucial for cellular proliferation, differentiation, and migration during organogenesis in invertebrates, these fundamental processes have been co-opted in human cancers. Initial evidence for the Hh pathway in tumor biology comes from mutations of signaling pathway components in a hereditary cancer syndrome that typically results in basal-cell carcinoma and medulloblastoma. Subsequent analysis revealed that Hh pathway mutations are found in sporadic tumors as well as activated Hh signaling in several epithelial cancers independent of Hh pathway mutation status. Further, recent evidence has demonstrated paracrine Hh signaling within stromal cells of the tumor microenvironment with implications for drug delivery. Several Hh antagonists targeting the Hh receptor, Smoothened (SMO), have been developed and show efficacy in preclinical studies and early-stage clinical trials in humans. However, major issues with these small molecule compounds include rapid acquired resistance, potential developmental toxicities secondary to use in children, and limited efficacy in cancers driven by Hh signaling downstream of the SMO receptor.

Introduction

The secreted signaling molecule, Hedgehog (Hh), and several components of its signal transduction pathway were initially identified secondary to their roles in early embryonic patterning through classical genetic mutagenesis screens in Drosophila (Nusslein-Volhard and Wieschaus, 1980). Subsequent analysis has revealed that most of the components of the pathway are conserved in higher organisms, including humans. Although the Hh signal transduction pathway has been described in detail in other chapters of this volume and in recent reviews (Ingham et al., 2011; Ng and Curran, 2011), the pathway in vertebrates will be summarized here as an introduction to this chapter that describes the dysregulation of Hh signaling in various cancers as well as within stromal cells of the tumor microenvironment.

In brief, Hh ligands bind to a 12-pass transmembrane receptor, Patched 1 (PTCH1), a negative regulator of the pathway, that results in its internalization and subsequent degradation. This results in release of the negative influence of PTCH1 on the 16-pass transmembrane protein, Smoothened (SMO), which then can enter the primary cilia through a poorly understood mechanism. Activated SMO then promotes dissociation of a Suppressor of fused (SUFU)-glioma associated oncogene homolog (GLI) protein complex that results in alterations in proteolytic processing of GLI proteins. This results in nuclear translocation and activation of the GLI2 transcription factor and degradation of the repressor, GLI3. The activated GLI2 protein stimulates the transcription of Hh pathway target genes, many of which are critical for important processes including cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration. Normally, the precise timing and duration of Hh signaling results in proper embryonic patterning as well as tissue differentiation during organogenesis (McMahon et al., 2003). However, alterations of the Hh pathway, primarily through mutations of pathway components or through mechanisms that result in upregulated GLI transcriptional activity, often result in dysregulated cell proliferation thus resulting in cancer.

Section snippets

Hh Signaling in Normal Development

The multiple roles for Hh signaling in normal developmental processes must be emphasized to better understand the mechanisms by which Hh pathway alterations contribute to oncogenesis as well as the potential consequences of Hh pathway inhibition for cancer therapy. In mammals, three related proteins, Desert Hedgehog (Dhh), Indian Hedgehog (Ihh), and Sonic Hedgehog (Shh), function as ligands for PTCH1. All mammalian Hh proteins are thought to have similar physiological effects on proliferation

Ligand-independent mechanisms

Genetic studies in Drosophila had identified the Hh receptor, PTCH1, as a negative regulator of Hh signal transduction. Binding of Hh ligand to PTCH1 relieves this inhibitory effect on the pathway, thus resulting in pathway activation. The initial evidence for the role of Hh signaling in cancer centered on identified mutations within the PTCH1 gene in patients with hereditary cancer syndromes. Specifically, patients with the hereditary Gorlin's syndrome, or basal-cell nevus syndrome, develop

SMO antagonists

Based on preclinical mouse modeling through tissue-specific Hh activation that recapitulates the biology of the human tumors, several Hh antagonists have been developed through in vitro screening of chemical libraries and proven to be efficacious in preclinical studies both in vitro and in vivo (Tremblay et al., 2010). Over 50 compounds have been identified as having an inhibitory effect on the Hh pathway. To date, most of these Hh antagonists have targeted the Hh receptor, SMO.

SMO small

Conclusions and Future Directions

A combination of intense investigation in both developmental biology and cancer research has led to the identification of Hh signaling as a critical component in both disciplines. The basic science understanding of this pathway and its effects on proliferation and differentiation of both normal cells and transformed cells has resulted in significant breakthroughs that are beginning to be translated into the clinical setting. The contributions of the medicinal chemistry field and biotechnology

Acknowledgments

G. P. R. was a Fellow of the Pediatric Scientist Development Program (NICHD K12-HD00850) and is currently supported by an NIH K08 Clinical Scientist Career Development Award (NINDS 5K08NS066083). The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References (60)

  • P. Sanchez et al.

    In vivo inhibition of endogeneous brain tumors through systemic interference of Hedgehog signaling in mice

    Mech. Dev.

    (2005)
  • S.J. Scales et al.

    Mechanisms of Hedgehog pathway activation in cancer and implications for therapy

    Trends Pharmacol. Sci.

    (2009)
  • M.R. Tremblay et al.

    New developments in the discovery of small molecule Hedgehog antagonists

    Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.

    (2010)
  • M. Athar et al.

    Inhibition of smoothened signaling prevents ultraviolet B-induced basal cell carcinomas through regulation of Fas expression and apoptosis

    Cancer Res.

    (2004)
  • E.M. Beauchamp et al.

    Arsenic trioxide inhibits human cancer cell growth and tumor development in mice by blocking Hedgehog/GLI pathway

    J. Clin. Invest.

    (2011)
  • E. Belloni et al.

    Identification of Sonic hedgehog as a candidate gene responsible for holoprosencephaly

    Nat. Genet.

    (1996)
  • D.M. Berman et al.

    Widespread requirement for Hedgehog ligand stimulation in growth of digestive tract tumours

    Nature

    (2003)
  • W. Binns et al.

    Cyclopian-type malformation in lambs

    Arch. Environ. Health

    (1962)
  • J.L. Brechbiel et al.

    PTHrP treatment fails to rescue bone defects caused by Hedgehog pathway inhibition in young mice

    Toxicol. Pathol.

    (2011)
  • S. Buonamici et al.

    Interfering with resistance to smoothened antagonists by inhibition of the PI3K pathway in medulloblastoma

    Sci. Transl. Med.

    (2010)
  • J.K. Chen et al.

    Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling by direct binding of cyclopamine to Smoothened

    Genes Dev.

    (2002)
  • J.K. Chen et al.

    Small molecule modulation of smoothened activity

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2002)
  • C. Chiang et al.

    Cyclopia and defective axial patterning in mice lacking Sonic hedgehog gene function

    Nature

    (1996)
  • M.K. Cooper et al.

    Teratogen-mediated inhibition of target tissue response to Shh signaling

    Science

    (1998)
  • G.J. Dijkgraaf et al.

    Small molecule inhibition of GDC-0449 refractory smoothened mutants and downstream mechanisms of drug resistance

    Cancer Res.

    (2011)
  • J.M. Hyman et al.

    Small-molecule inhibitors reveal multiple strategies for Hedgehog pathway blockade

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2009)
  • J.P. Incardona et al.

    The teratogenic Veratrum alkaloid cyclopamine inhibits sonic hedgehog signal transduction

    Development

    (1998)
  • P.W. Ingham et al.

    Mechanisms and functions of Hedgehog signaling across the metazoa

    Nat. Rev. Genet.

    (2011)
  • R.L. Johnson et al.

    Human homolog of patched, a candidate gene for the basal cell nevus syndrome

    Science

    (1996)
  • J. Kim et al.

    Arsenic antagonizes the Hedgehog pathway by preventing ciliary accumulation and reducing stability of the Gli2 transcriptional effector

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2010)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Targeting Hedgehog signaling pathway: Paving the road for cancer therapy

      2019, Pharmacological Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      IPI-926 (a Smo antagonist) in conjunction with gemcitabine, demonstrated a decrease in fibrotic reaction [34,94]. In cell viability assays, another compound, robotnikinin, was found to act as a Hh pathway inhibitor by binding the amino terminal region of SHh (SHhN) [95,96]. Taladegib (LY2940680) was reported to restrain Smo-resistant mutant cells [97] and Itraconazole showed the capability to bind the Smo receptor and inhibit its accumulation in the cilium [98].

    • Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling in the gastrointestinal tract: Targeting the cancer microenvironment

      2014, Cancer Treatment Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Subsequent studies confirmed the expression of Hh pathway components in cancer tissue and cell lines, putative cancer stem cells and the stroma [26,58–60]. The pattern of Hh ligand expression and its signaling components have been used to determine the direction of signaling with implications for developing anti-cancer strategies [61]. Typically canonical Hh signaling indicates that the ligand is produced in an epithelial cell and received by a stromal cell (Fig. 1).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text