Elsevier

Transport Policy

Volume 3, Issues 1–2, January–April 1996, Pages 21-35
Transport Policy

Paper
Energy trends in the Japanese transportation sector

https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-070X(96)00001-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Passenger transportation in Japan, which is comprised of a high share of rail passengers and a low share of private vehicles, is considered one of the least energy-intensive transportation sectors in the industrialized countries. The thesis of this paper is that, despite low per capita energy use, when the intensities of individual modes are compared, Japanese transportation is not more energy efficient. Here, a detailed 25-year energy balance of this sector is analyzed, disaggregating fuel use within the different modes of transport as well as identifying the role of mini-cars and mini-trucks in Japanse transport activity and energy use. Changes in activity, modal structure, and modal energy intensity are separated out to describe energy-consumption trends. (Modal structure is found to be the primary factor behind the current low energy intensity of passenger transport and the high energy intensity of freight.) It is shown, through comparisons with similar data for the USA and eight European countries, that the low per capita energy use for passenger travel in Japan is related to both the low level of travel in general and the great importance of rail and bus, while there is very little difference between the structure of Japanese and European energy use for freight. The increased use of larger private cars and freight trucks continues to raise the energy intensity of the transportation sector, while air transport continues to gain shares in both sectors. Indeed, aggregate travel in Japan is more energy intensive than it is in Europe, and aggregate freight more energy intensive than in either the USA or Europe. Past improvements in energy efficiency were for the most part motivated by commercial concerns. No specific government policies to conserve transportation energy exist, and there is little evidence that policies had any effects on energy use, except, perhaps to increase energy use. The concluding discussion addresses the effects of Japanese transportation energy trends on carbon dioxide emissions.

References (22)

  • L. Schipper et al.

    New car test and actual fuel economy: Yet another gap?

    Transport Policy

    (1994)
  • L. Schipper et al.

    Mind the gap: the vicious circle of measuring automobile fuel use

    Energy Policy

    (1993,[object Object])
  • Alun Anderson

    Trains, lifts and automobiles

    New Scientist

    (1993)
  • Andy Coghlan

    Electric dreams take to the road

    New Scientist

    (1993)
  • Satoshi Hidaka

    Modal shifts and energy efficiency

    Energy In Japan

    (1993)
  • R. Howarth et al.

    The structure and intensity of energy use: trends in five OECD nations

    Energy Journal

    (1993)
  • The Institute of Energy Economics

    Internal paper, ‘Energy data and demand of transportation sector in Japan’

    (~1992)
  • Japan Automobile Association, Rikuun Tokei Yoran (Land Transport Statistical Handbook), various...
  • Nancy Kiang et al.

    Energy trends in Japan's transportation sector

    Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report, LBL-35979

    (1995)
  • S.C. McDonald

    A Comparison of Energy Intensity in the United States and Japan

    (1990)
  • Ministry of Transport, Jidosha Unso Tokei Nenjo (‘Automobile Transportation Statistical Yearbook’), Heisei...
  • Cited by (27)

    • The influencing factors and spatial spillover effects of CO<inf>2</inf> emissions from transportation in China

      2019, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Scholl et al. (1996) explored the impacts of transportation activities, modal structure and energy intensity on CO2 emissions from passenger transportation in nine OECD countries. Kiang and Schipper (1996) compared Japan with the United States and eight European countries, and found that in Japan, the low per capita energy consumption for passenger transportation is largely due to the development of public transport system. Lu et al. (2007) studied the carbon emissions from highway transportation in Germany, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, and suggested that the fast growth of the economy and car ownership are two significant factors promoting their growth, while population density helps to reduce them.

    • Examining the impacts of socio-economic factors, urban form and transportation development on CO<inf>2</inf> emissions from transportation in China: A panel data analysis of China's provinces

      2015, Habitat International
      Citation Excerpt :

      A study by Ribeiro and Balassiano (1997) found that the use of private cars for the daily commute contributed almost eight times more to CO2 emissions than the use of urban buses in the Metropolitan Region of the Brazilian city of Rio de Janeiro. Through comparisons with the U.S.A. and eight European countries, Kiang and Schipper (1996) argued that the low per capita energy use for passenger travel in Japan benefited from the higher development level of rail and bus. Another study in China also showed that the proportion of bus travel had a significantly negative effect on CO2 from transportation (Su, Zhang, Li, & Ni, 2011).

    • The causes of the high energy intensity of the Kazakh economy: A characterization of its energy system

      2014, Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      The specific energy consumption of each kind of transport is adjusted (within the ranges reported in the literature) to match the aggregated energy consumption per fuel reported by the IEA and ASRK [4,23] for each transport category. The energy consumption for each kind of transport was obtained from a number of sources [44–57]. The production (t/year) of each agricultural product or the surface dedicated to a specific crop (ha/year) is obtained from ASRK [23].

    • Road transport-related energy consumption: Analysis of driving factors in Tunisia

      2013, Energy Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Transport intensity and energy intensity indicators are used as important tools in the analysis of the relationship between economic growth, energy consumption and changes in the quantity of gas emissions from the transport sector. Kiang and Schipper (1996) have decomposed transport energy efficiency into three factors: transport activity (transport volume), modal structure (share of every modal) and energy average use. They have shown that technical progress is insufficient not only to achieve the decoupling between economic growth and the growth of transport demand but also to restrain the increase of transport demand and to stop the evolution of road transport share.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Work supported by the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC03-76SF00098, the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and the Swedish Board for Communications Research, as well as by donations from Volvo AB to the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, by donations from Shell Oil, TOTAL SA, and Conoco to the Energy and Resources Group, and by General Motors Corporation, through a donation to the Institute for Urban and Regional Development, the University of California at Berkeley. Opinions are those of the authors and not those of the sponsors, the University, or the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

    View full text