A characterization of the spatiotemporal variability of non-urban ozone concentrations over the eastern United States

doi:10.1016/0960-1686(93)90035-W

Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics

Volume 27, Issue 16, November 1993, Pages 2645-2668

https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90035-W Get rights and content

Abstract

The spatial and temporal variability of the daily 1-h maximum O₃ concentrations over non-urban areas of the eastern United States of America was examined for the period 1985–1990 using principal component analysis. Utilization of Kaiser's Varimax orthogonal rotation led to the delineation of six contiguous subregions or “influence regimes” which together accounted for 64.02% of the total variance. Each subregion displayed statistically unique O₃ characteristics and corresponded well with the path and frequency of anticyclones. When compared to the entire domain, the mid-Atlantic and south subregions observe higher mean daily 1-h maximum concentrations. Concentrations are near the domain average for the northeast and southwest subregions and are lowest in the Great Lakes and Florida subregions. The percentage of observations exceeding 120 ppb were greates in the mid-Atlantic and southwest subregions, near the domain average in the northeast and south subregions, and lowest in the Great Lakes and Florida subregions.

Examination of the time series of the principal component scores associated with the subregions indicated that Great Lakes and mid-Atlantic subregions tend to observe a stronger seasonal cycle, with maximum concentrations occurring during the last week in June and first week in July, respectively. The strength of this seasonality is weakened for the northeast and south subregions and its timing delayed, until the end of July and the first of August, respectively. The southwest subregion experiences a greatly diminished seasonality, with maximum concentrations delayed until the middle of August. The seasonality found in the Florida subregion is unique in both its strength and timing, as the highest concentrations consistently occur during the months of April and May. The time series were then deseasonalized and autocorrelations and spectral density estimates calculated, revealing that persistence is much more prevalent in the Florida (autocorrelation significant to a lag of 4 days), south (3 days) and southwest (3 days) subregions. Conversely, autocorrelations are only significant to a lag of one day in the northeast and two days for the Great Lakes and mid-Atlantic subregions.

References (50)

A.P. Altshuller
Relationships between direction of wind flow and ozone inflow concentrations at rural locations outside of St. Louis, MO
Atmospheric Environment
(1986)
R.P. Angle et al.
Rural ozone concentrations in Alberta, Canada
Atmospheric Environment
(1986)
L.L. Ashbaugh et al.
A principal component analysis of sulfur concentrations in the western United States
Atmospheric Environment
(1984)
B.K. Eder
A principal component analysis of SO₄²⁻ precipitation concentrations over the Eastern United States
Atmospheric Environment
(1989)
D.M. Holland et al.
Fitting statistical distributions to air quality data by the maximum likelihood method
Atmospheric Environment
(1982)
W.J. King et al.
Some dynamic aspects of extended pollution episodes
Atmospheric Environment
(1982)
P.E. Korsog et al.
An examination of urban ozone trends in the Northeastern U.S. (1973–1983) using a robust statistical method
Atmospheric Environment
(1991)
A.S. Lefohn et al.
Ozone, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide trends at rural sites located in the United States
Atmospheric Environment
(1991)
J.F. Meagher et al.
Rural ozone in the southeastern United States
Atmospheric Environment
(1987)
F.M. Vukovich et al.
The climatology of summertime O₃ and SO₂ (1977–1981)
Atmospheric Environment
(1986)

F.M. Vukovich et al.

On the relationship between high ozone in the rural surface layer and high pressure systems

Atmospheric Environment

(1977)

V.P. Aneja et al.

Characterization of ozone at high elevation in the Eastern United States: trends, seasonal variations, and exposure

J. Geophys. Res.

(1992)

G.E.P. Box et al.

Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control

(1970)

C.E. Buell

The topography of empirical orthogonal functions

R.B. Cattell

The scree test for the number of factors

Multivar. Behav. Res.

(1966)

W.L. Chameides et al.

The role of biogenic hydrocarbons in urban photochemical smog: Atlanta as a case study

Science

(1988)

B.I. Chevone et al.

Tree decline in North America

Envir. Pollut.

(1988)

W.M. Cox et al.

Ambient ozone concentration patterns among eastern United States urban areas using factor analysis

J. Air. Pollut. Control Ass.

(1981)

H.L. Crutcher et al.

Application of cluster analysis to aerometric data

J. Air Pollut. Control Ass.

(1986)

C.E. Decker et al.

Formation and transport of oxidants along the Gulf Coast and in the northern U.S. EPA

B.K. Eder et al.

Spatial and temporal analysis of the Palmer Drought Severity Index over the Southeastern United States

J. Clim.

(1987)

C.W. Harris et al.

Oblique factor analytic solutions by orthogonal transformations

Psychometrika

(1964)

J.D. Horel

A rotated principal component analysis of the interannual variability of the Northern Hemisphere 500 mb height field

Mon. Weath. Rev.

(1981)

H.F. Kaiser

The Varimax criterion for analytical rotation in factor analysis

Psychometrika

(1958)

N.A. Kelly et al.

The chemical and meteorological conditions associated with high and low ozone concentrations in Southeastern Michigan and nearby areas of Ontario

J. Air Pollut. Control Ass.

(1986)

Cited by (66)

Investigation of the Community Multiscale air quality (CMAQ) model representation of the Climate Penalty Factor (CPF)
2022, Atmospheric Environment
Elevated levels of tropospheric ozone (O₃) caused by anthropogenic emissions of NO_x and VOCs have a negative impact on human health, crops, and ecosystems. Even if precursor emissions are reduced compared to current levels, predicted higher temperatures due to increased greenhouse gas emissions could impede resulting air quality benefits. The Climate Penalty Factor (CPF) has been devised to quantify the adverse impact of increasing temperatures on surface O₃. We compute the CPF from surface observations at CASTNET (mostly rural) and AQS (mostly urban) sites and compare these values to CMAQ output for the contiguous U.S. and seven sub-regions for the O₃ season (May 1 through September 30) for each year from 2002 through 2012. Here we show that CMAQ can in general reproduce with reasonable accuracy the CPF for the CONUS. In predominantly rural regions (CASTNET) observed CPFs are 1.94 ppb/°C while simulated CPFs are 2.11 ppb/°C. Observed CPFs are 2.00 ppb/°C in predominantly urban regions (AQS), lower than simulated CPFs of 2.39 ppb/°C. CMAQ reproduces CPFs at rural sites reasonably well but tends to somewhat overestimate CPFs at urban sites. Upon examination of each region, the CMAQ simulation for the Southeast shows a substantial overestimate (43%) of CPF for urban (AQS) sites. Conversely, the CMAQ simulations for the Northeast show a slight underestimate (8%) of the CPF at rural (CASTNET) sites. Both results for CPF (overestimated for urban sites and either underestimated or close to observed for rural sites) could be related to the tendency of CMAQ with CB05-TUCL (an excessively long lifetime of alkyl nitrates with respect to photolysis) to overestimate NO_x or keep it too close to the urban source locations. Our analysis suggests that CMAQ may attribute a somewhat greater fraction of O₃ production to an increase in temperature than observed. Finally, there is a ∼2% per year decrease in CPF throughout the CONUS during the 11-year period in both measurements and the CMAQ simulations, suggesting that reductions in NO_x emissions can mitigate the impact of climate change on surface ozone.
A reduced form model for ozone based on two decades of CMAQ simulations for the continental United States
2017, Atmospheric Pollution Research
Citation Excerpt :
The initial emissions+meteorology dimension of a given region equals the product of the number of emission and meteorological variables (22) and the number of model cells (between 298 and 1637, depending on region). Dimension reduction was accomplished when a few ‘scores’ (PCS) explaining much of the variability in X was retained (see Eder et al., 1993 for other air quality applications of principal component analysis). In this case, the set of PCS explaining more than 95% of the predictor variability was retained (ranging between 14 and 28 PCS depending on region).
A Reduced Form Model (RFM) is a mathematical relationship between the inputs and outputs of an air quality model, permitting estimation of additional modeling without costly new regional-scale simulations. A 21-year Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) simulation for the continental United States provided the basis for the RFM developed in this study. Predictors included the principal component scores (PCS) of emissions and meteorological variables, while the predictand was the monthly mean of daily maximum 8-h CMAQ ozone for the ozone season at each model grid. The PCS form an orthogonal basis for RFM inputs. A few PCS incorporate most of the variability of emissions and meteorology, thereby reducing the dimensionality of the source-receptor problem. Stochastic kriging was used to estimate the model.
The RFM was used to separate the effects of emissions and meteorology on ozone concentrations. By running the RFM with emissions constant (ozone dependent on meteorology), or constant meteorology (ozone dependent on emissions). Years with ozone-conducive meteorology were identified, and meteorological variables best explaining meteorology-dependent ozone were identified. Meteorology accounted for 19%–55% of ozone variability in the eastern US, and 39%–92% in the western US. Temporal trends estimated for original CMAQ ozone data and emission-dependent ozone were mostly negative, but the confidence intervals for emission-dependent ozone are much narrower. Emission-driven changes in monthly mean ozone levels for the period 2000–2010 ranged from 6.4 to 10.9 ppb for the eastern US and from 1.4 to 2.5 ppb for the western US.
Model evaluation and ensemble modelling of surface-level ozone in Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII
2012, Atmospheric Environment
Citation Excerpt :
For NA, the number of rural receptors in the four sub-regions varies between 134 and 150. The NA sub-regions are broadly derived from previous studies (e.g., Eder et al., 1993), and consider the NOx emissions intensity, with the additional constraint of a uniform number of receptors. Sub-region NA1, consisting of the western portion of the United States and south-western Canada, has high emissions along the coast of California, smaller emissions toward the interior of the continent, a high amount of solar radiation, low relative humidity, and some large cities with poor air quality (e.g., Los Angeles).
More than ten state-of-the-art regional air quality models have been applied as part of the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII). These models were run by twenty independent groups in Europe and North America. Standardised modelling outputs over a full year (2006) from each group have been shared on the web-distributed ENSEMBLE system, which allows for statistical and ensemble analyses to be performed by each group. The estimated ground-level ozone mixing ratios from the models are collectively examined in an ensemble fashion and evaluated against a large set of observations from both continents. The scale of the exercise is unprecedented and offers a unique opportunity to investigate methodologies for generating skilful ensembles of regional air quality models outputs. Despite the remarkable progress of ensemble air quality modelling over the past decade, there are still outstanding questions regarding this technique. Among them, what is the best and most beneficial way to build an ensemble of members? And how should the optimum size of the ensemble be determined in order to capture data variability as well as keeping the error low? These questions are addressed here by looking at optimal ensemble size and quality of the members. The analysis carried out is based on systematic minimization of the model error and is important for performing diagnostic/probabilistic model evaluation. It is shown that the most commonly used multi-model approach, namely the average over all available members, can be outperformed by subsets of members optimally selected in terms of bias, error, and correlation. More importantly, this result does not strictly depend on the skill of the individual members, but may require the inclusion of low-ranking skill-score members. A clustering methodology is applied to discern among members and to build a skilful ensemble based on model association and data clustering, which makes no use of priori knowledge of model skill. Results show that, while the methodology needs further refinement, by optimally selecting the cluster distance and association criteria, this approach can be useful for model applications beyond those strictly related to model evaluation, such as air quality forecasting.
Surface ozone-temperature relationships in the eastern US: A monthly climatology for evaluating chemistry-climate models
2012, Atmospheric Environment
We use long-term, coincident O₃ and temperature measurements at the regionally representative US Environmental Protection Agency Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNet) over the eastern US from 1988 through 2009 to characterize the surface O₃ response to year-to-year fluctuations in weather, for the purpose of evaluating global chemistry-climate models. We first produce a monthly climatology for each site over all available years, defined as the slope of the best-fit line (m_O3-T) between monthly average values of maximum daily 8-hour average (MDA8) O₃ and monthly average values of daily maximum surface temperature (T_max). Applying two distinct statistical approaches to aggregate the site-specific measurements to the regional scale, we find that summer time m_O3-T is 3–6 ppb K⁻¹ (r = 0.5–0.8) over the Northeast, 3–4 ppb K⁻¹ (r = 0.5–0.9) over the Great Lakes, and 3–6 ppb K⁻¹ (r = 0.2–0.8) over the Mid-Atlantic. The Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) Atmospheric Model version 3 (AM3) global chemistry-climate model generally captures the seasonal variations in correlation coefficients and m_O3-T despite biases in both monthly mean summertime MDA8 O₃ (up to +10 to +30 ppb) and daily T_max (up to +5 K) over the eastern US. During summer, GFDL AM3 reproduces m_O3-T over the Northeast (m_O3-T = 2–6 ppb K⁻¹; r = 0.6–0.9), but underestimates m_O3-T by 4 ppb K⁻¹ over the Mid-Atlantic, in part due to excessively warm temperatures above which O₃ production saturates in the model. Combining T_max biases in GFDL AM3 with an observation-based m_O3-T estimate of 3 ppb K⁻¹implies that temperature biases could explain up to 5–15 ppb of the MDA8 O₃ bias in August and September though correcting for excessively cool temperatures would worsen the O₃ bias in June. We underscore the need for long-term, coincident measurements of air pollution and meteorological variables to develop process-level constraints for evaluating chemistry-climate models used to project air quality responses to climate change.
Characterization of ambient PM<inf>2.5</inf> concentrations
2010, Atmospheric Environment
Statistical spatial and temporal analysis of PM_2.5 concentrations in ambient air using principal component analysis may provide health risk information for air-quality management. This investigation simultaneously determines and interprets spatial variations and features of PM_2.5 concentrations using ambient air-quality monitoring data during 2006–2008 and emission inventory. Daily mean values of PM_2.5 and PM₁₀ and maximum hourly data of SO₂, CO, O₃ and NO₂ were calculated as sampling data for year 2006–2008. Therefore, principal component analysis and descriptive statistics of ambient air pollutants were utilized to assess the spatial features and variations of PM_2.5 concentrations. This study also provides PM_2.5/PM₁₀ ratios and the rates at which 24-h particulate matter exceed air-quality standards over Taiwan. Analytical results indicate that four rotational components cumulatively explain 87% and 84% of concentration variances for PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 and form a delineation of four “influence regimes.” The separated districts of the four “influence regimes” for PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 were the same. With the rate at which PM_2.5 24-h concentrations were above 65 μg m⁻³, 36% of air-quality stations, is higher than 10%; 24% of air-quality stations is higher than 15%. Based on analytical results, if the PM_2.5 limit would be considered as National Ambient Air-Quality Standard in the future, the priority of reducing PM₁₀ or O₃ concentrations in the past decade could be replaced with PM_2.5. The novel methodologies presented in this study can spatially assess adequate boundaries of atmospheric carrying capacity for particulate matter. Local governments located at the same influence regime characterized by factor loading isopleths should implement trans-boundary air pollution control programs. Box plots, the rates of particulate matter exceeding air-quality standards and PM_2.5/PM₁₀ ratios in distinct “influenced regimes” were also examined. Continued study of spatial and temporal variations in airborne PM_2.5 concentrations will provide sufficient information about health risks and for air-quality control programs.
Real-time bias-adjusted O<inf>3</inf> and PM<inf>2.5</inf> air quality index forecasts and their performance evaluations over the continental United States
2010, Atmospheric Environment
The National Air Quality Forecast Capacity (NAQFC) system, which links NOAA’s North American Mesoscale (NAM) meteorological model with EPA’s Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model, provided operational ozone (O₃) and experimental fine particular matter (PM_2.5) forecasts over the continental United States (CONUS) during 2008. This paper describes the implementation of a real-time Kalman Filter (KF) bias-adjustment technique to improve the accuracy of O₃ and PM_2.5 forecasts at discrete monitoring locations. The operational surface-level O₃ and PM_2.5 forecasts from the NAQFC system were post-processed by the KF bias-adjusted technique using near real-time hourly O₃ and PM_2.5 observations obtained from EPA’s AIRNow measurement network. The KF bias-adjusted forecasts were created daily, providing 24-h hourly bias-adjusted forecasts for O₃ and PM_2.5 at all AIRNow monitoring sites within the CONUS domain. The bias-adjustment post-processing implemented in this study requires minimal computational cost; requiring less than 10 min of CPU on a single processor Linux machine to generate 24-h hourly bias-adjusted forecasts over the entire CONUS domain.
The results show that the real-time KF bias-adjusted forecasts for both O₃ and PM_2.5 have performed as well as or even better than the previous studies when the same technique was applied to the historical O₃ and PM_2.5 time series from archived AQF in earlier years. Compared to the raw forecasts, the KF forecasts displayed significant improvement in the daily maximum 8-h O₃ and daily mean PM_2.5 forecasts in terms of both discrete (i.e., reduced errors, increased correlation coefficients, and index of agreement) and categorical (increased hit rate and decreased false alarm ratio) evaluation metrics at almost all locations during the study period in 2008.

View all citing articles on Scopus

^∗: On assignment to the Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

View full text