ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Artificial Intelligence in Engineering
Volume 3, Issue 3, July 1988, Pages 141-150
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (1085 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/0954-1810(88)90030-1    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 1988 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.

HELIX: A helicopter diagnostic system based on qualitative physics

Thomas P. Hamilton

Advanced Software Technology, United Technologies Research Center, United Technologies Corporation, Silver Lane, East Hartford, Connecticut 06108, USA

Available online 1 April 2003.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Future helicopter requirements, including expanded missions and single-pilot operation, will greatly increase the demands placed on the pilot. To meet these requirements without overwhelming the pilot, novel approaches to cockpit automation must be devloped. To assess the feasibility of applying Artificial Intelligence technology to helicopter cockpit automation, an expert system for status monitoring and diagnosis designated HELIX (HELicopter Integrated eXpert) has been developed.

At the heart of the HELIX program is a Qualitative Reasoning System (QRS). The QRS is a general mechanism to support the creation of hierarchical device models and reasoning about device behaviour using Qualitative Physics. The HELIX qualitative model is represented as a set of constraints that define the normal behaviour of the engines, transmission, flight controls, and rotors of the helicopter. Aircraft health is assessed by determining whether observations (sensor readings and pilot control inputs) are consistent with the constraints of the model. If an inconsistency is detected, a process of systematic constraint suspension is used to test various failure hypotheses.

Critical to the efficient operation of the HELIX program is the hierarchical model representation, which enables reasoning at various levels of abstraction. Using a top-down approach, the diagnostic process exploits the hierarchy by beginning fault isolation with the most reduced form of the model. To refine the diagnosis, a branch of the hierarchy may be expanded until a component-level diagnosis is made. The hierarchy also greatly reduces the complexity of multiple failure diagnosis. Rather than considering combinations of failures in all leaf components, the diagnosis can be restricted to combinations of branches in the hierarchy.

HELIX has been successfully tested on a variety of simulated failures. By representing only the normal behaviour of the helicopter and testing hypotheses by constraint suspension, HELIX has been able to diagnose single or multiple failures without prior knowledge of failure modes. The approach represents a promising technique for automating the qualitative reasoning required to diagnose novel failures and may form the basis for extensive automation both in airborne and ground-based diagnostic systems.

Author Keywords: diagnostics; expert systems; qualitative physics; helicopters

Article Outline

• References

 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.