Main article
Comparison of various coils used for magnetic stimulation of peripheral motor nerves: physiological considerations and consequences for diagnostic use

https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-980X(95)00146-CGet rights and content

Abstract

We compared the ability of 4 magnetic coils to activate peripheral nerves in healthy subjects. No differences in motor threshold intensities were found between the coils, but the intensities needed to elicit maximum compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes were different. For superficial nerves maximum CMAPs in comparison with electrical stimulation were usually but not always found. CMAPs were at their maximum only when the direction of induced current flowed from proximal to distal and when a certain part of the coil was over the nerve. Distal nerve stimulation was time consuming. Due to artifacts many stimuli were necessary and sometimes no maximum CMAP could be elicited. CMAPs were much less sensitive to position changes of the coil than to changes in an electrical stimulator. Small circular coils were superior to larger coils in terms of the lower intensities necessary to elicit maximum CMAPs, better focusing of the stimulus, and less artifacts. For deep nerves amplitudes were always submaximal. Coactivation of nearby nerves and underlying muscles was another main drawback especially at proximal sites and for coils of large diameter. Despite better focusing, double coils are less useful due to their great diameter. Magnetic stimulation cannot replace electrical neurography at the moment, even if different coils are used at different sites of stimulation.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (23)

  • Comparison of a special designed high intensity coil to a standard round coil-TMS-setting

    2017, Journal of Neuroscience Methods
    Citation Excerpt :

    As it could be expected, differences between HI-coil and PES were statistically significant, with higher CMAP-amplitudes associated with PES. The use of TMS for peripheral nerve stimulation has been investigated systematically for median and ulnar nerves (Bischoff et al., 1995). It was shown, that the spatial orientation of the induced E- field towards the nerve is critical, the stimulation intensity might shift the activation more distally along the nerve which bias towards shorter CMAP-latencies.

  • Magnetic-motor-root stimulation: Review

    2013, Clinical Neurophysiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    As distinct from nerve-conduction studies (NCS) conducted by electrical stimulation, for the peripheral nervous system, magnetic stimulation is not generally applicable to analyse the distal part of peripheral nerves. One reason for this is that supramaximal stimulation is not easily achieved, even with maximum output of the magnetic stimulator (Olney et al., 1990; Bischoff et al., 1995). Therefore, the size of compound-muscle action potentials (CMAPs) cannot always be analysed as a parameter for peripheral neuropathy.

  • Physiology and function

    2006, Handbook of Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Activation of peripheral nerve and nerve roots

    2005, Magnetic Stimulation in Clinical Neurophysiology
View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented in part at the IXth International Congress of Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology in Jerusalem, 8–12 June 1992

View full text