Elsevier

Ecological Economics

Volume 6, Issue 3, December 1992, Pages 211-233
Ecological Economics

Ecological economics and scientific controversies. Lessons from some recent policy making in the EEC

https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(92)90026-OGet rights and content

Abstract

Contrasting the very limited scientific evidence on the forest dieback issue with the sudden adoption of policies on air pollution decided in the FRG (1983–1984) and extended to the European Community (1985), we propose an interpretative framework for the real internalization process at work in what was tantamount to a social crisis for public opinion, the media and political actors. We conclude that open scientific controversies on some environmental issues (effects, causes, solutions) pave the way for some actors to use the issue for their own techno-industrial strategies quite alien to ecological constraints. In cases of very high uncertainties on impacts, it becomes impossible to apply conventional social cost-benefit analysis (SCBA) as an optimizing tool. We propose to develop economic analysis as a negotiation language and to give pride of place to the value of learning time and to the crucial role of technological pluralism as a condition for flexibility in the future.

References (47)

  • R.C. Bishop

    Option value: an exposition and extension

    Land Econ.

    (1982)
  • M. Bonneau et al.

    De quoi la forêt est-elle malade?

    Recherches

    (1988)
  • M. Bonneau et al.

    Acidic precipitation research in France

  • K.E. Boulding

    The economics of coming spaceship Earth

  • D. Bromley

    Property rights, liability rules and environmental economics

    J. Econ. Issues

    (1978)
  • CITEPA

    Evolution des émissions de polluants atmosphéri-ques en France 1980–1988

    Etudes Documentaires No. 92

    (1989)
  • E.F. Denison

    Accounting for Slower Economic Growth — The United States in the 1970's

    (1979)
  • J.P. Dupuy

    Convention and Common Knowledge

    Rev. Econ.

    (1989)
  • O. Favereau

    Valeur d'option et flexibilité: de la rationalité substantielle á la rationalité procédurale

  • O. Godard

    Autonomie socio-économique et externalisation de l'environnement: la théorie néo-classique mise en perspective

    Econ. Appl.

    (1984)
  • O. Godard et al.

    Entre nature et société, les enjeux des irréversibilités dans la construction économique et sociale du champ de l'environnement

  • C. Henry

    Investment decisions under uncertainty: the irreversibility effect

    Am. Econ. Rev.

    (1974)
  • Cited by (20)

    • Unraveling the veil of fuzziness: A thick description of sustainability economics

      2015, Ecological Economics
      Citation Excerpt :

      For this, technological and social innovations are required. Hourcade et al. (1992) stress, for example, that attempts at internalization should result in changing development pathways: “The core of the matter is less the problem of internalizing the external costs with a given toolbox of pre-existing antipollution techniques than to trigger a new innovative dynamic” (p. 227). Next to socio-ecological indicators and environmental policy, Kapp also proposed strategic technological development (Berger, 2008).

    • Games of influence in climate change negotiations: Modelling interactions

      2007, Ecological Modelling
      Citation Excerpt :

      To argue this claim, recall first that climate change is subject to important uncertainties. This calls for a context of decision-making under controversies in which it is not possible to postpone all decisions until a satisfactory level of information has been reached (Hourcade et al., 1992). Because policy making has to run ahead of scientific clarity, the competition between theory and prospects about the future is a part and parcel of the strategy of each actor who tries to tilt the balance in favor of the theory which maximizes his own strategic advantage.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text