ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Neural Networks
Volume 3, Issue 6, 1990, Pages 651-669
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (1562 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/0893-6080(90)90055-P    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 1990 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Original contribution

Algebraic transformations of objective functionsstar, open

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Eric MjolsnessCorresponding Author Contact Information, a and Charles Garretta

aYale University USA


Received 27 March 1989; 
accepted 31 January 1990. 
Available online 5 March 2003.

Abstract

Many neural networks can be derived as optimization dynamics for suitable objective functions. We show that such networks can be designed by repeated transformations of one objective into another with the same fixpoints. We exhibit a collection of algebraic transformations which reduce network cost and increase the set of objective functions that are neurally implementable. The transformations include simplification of products of expressions, functions of one or two expressions, and sparse matrix products (all of which may be interpreted as Legendre transformations); also the minimum and maximum of a set of expressions. These transformations introduce new interneurons which force the network to seek a saddle point rather than a minimum. Other transformations allow control of the network dynamics, by reconciling the Lagrangian formalism with the need for fixpoints. We apply the transformations to simplify a number of structured neural networks, beginning with the standard reduction of the winner-take-all network from ∂(N2) connections to ∂(N). Also susceptible are inexact graph-matching, random dot matching, convolutions and coordinate transformations, and sorting. Simulations show that fixpoint-preserving transformations may be applied repeatedly and elaborately, and the example networks still robustly converge.

Keywords: Objective function; Structured neural network; Analog circuit; Transformation of objective; Fixpoint-preserving transformation; Lagrangian dynamics; Graph-matching neural net; Winner-take-all neural net

star, openThis work was supported in part by AFOSR grant AFOSR-88-0240.


Corresponding Author Contact InformationRequests for reprints should be sent to Eric Mjolsness, Yale Computer Science Department, P.O. Box 2158 Yale Station. New Haven. CT 06520.

Neural Networks
Volume 3, Issue 6, 1990, Pages 651-669
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.